You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com> on 2013/04/17 02:36:19 UTC

[ACS41] Can we resolve CLOUDSTACK-2027?

Edison,

CLOUDSTACK-2027 is listed as critical, and tied to 4.1.0.  Any chance
you can review it please?  The description mentions that it might just
be a configuration error, however I'd like to be sure before cutting the
RC.

Thanks!

-chip

Re: [ACS41] Can we resolve CLOUDSTACK-2027?

Posted by Chiradeep Vittal <Ch...@citrix.com>.

According to 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-934

The bug reporter (Angie) is trying to use a hand-rolled version of RHEL
(libvirt and ovs).
I'd agree with Edison's assessment that we should only support whatever
the vendor supports.

On 4/16/13 5:36 PM, "Chip Childers" <ch...@sungard.com> wrote:

>Edison,
>
>CLOUDSTACK-2027 is listed as critical, and tied to 4.1.0.  Any chance
>you can review it please?  The description mentions that it might just
>be a configuration error, however I'd like to be sure before cutting the
>RC.
>
>Thanks!
>
>-chip