Re: mod_cgi/8266: User space CGIs fail, but work elsewhere (fwd)

[Marc Slemko <ma...@znep.com>]

The following reply was made to PR mod_cgi/8266; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Marc Slemko <ma...@znep.com>
To: Apache bugs database <ap...@apache.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: mod_cgi/8266: User space CGIs fail, but work elsewhere (fwd)
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:35:52 -0700 (PDT)

 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:30:38 -0500
 From: Shawn Carnley <Sh...@usm.edu>
 To: marc@apache.org
 Subject: Re: mod_cgi/8266: User space CGIs fail, but work elsewhere
 
 Thank you very much. I would have never figured that out.  I disabled
 suexec and everything seems to be working.  
 
 Thank you again.
 Shawn Carnley
 
 marc@apache.org wrote:
 > 
 > [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, you need]
 > [to include <ap...@Apache.Org> in the Cc line and make sure the]
 > [subject line starts with the report component and number, with ]
 > [or without any 'Re:' prefixes (such as "general/1098:" or      ]
 > ["Re: general/1098:").  If the subject doesn't match this       ]
 > [pattern, your message will be misfiled and ignored.  The       ]
 > ["apbugs" address is not added to the Cc line of messages from  ]
 > [the database automatically because of the potential for mail   ]
 > [loops.  If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig-   ]
 > [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request from a  ]
 > [developer.  Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS!     ]
 > 
 > Synopsis: User space CGIs fail, but work elsewhere
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
 > State-Changed-By: marc
 > State-Changed-When: Wed Aug 29 11:55:30 PDT 2001
 > State-Changed-Why:
 > RedHat likes to enable random features like suexec in their RPMs.  This is almost certainly the reason for your CGIs failing; look at the suexec log, whereever redhat decided to put it, and the suexec docs for details.