You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cloudstack.apache.org by Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com> on 2017/07/07 06:14:17 UTC
[DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
All,
With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.
To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider reverting:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
- Rohit
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>.
All,
We've helped with several PR reviews and merges recently, both in 4.9 and master.
We'll stop accepting any changes by end of next week (18 August), afterwards we'll only accept test and blocker fixes blocking the release.
Feel free to suggest any commits/fixes/PRs we should consider towards 4.9.3.0.
Following satisfactory test results (both Travis, Trillian and others) on 4.9 branch we'll cut 4.9.3.0 RC1 for voting.
Regards.
________________________________
From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 1:05:56 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Hi Rohit
I previous suggested these for 4.9.3.0
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after vRouter reboot)
I'd also like to suggest these:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1246 (unable to use reserved IP range in a network)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2201 (VPC VR doesn't respond to DNS requests from remote access vpn clients)
Thanks
Sean
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
-----Original Message-----
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 5:56 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
All,
We'll accept bugfixes on 4.9 branch till end of next week, following which I'll start release work towards 4.9.3.0 (LTS) release. Please help review outstanding PRs, share PRs that we should consider and advise/suggest issues that need to be reverted/backported, for example see: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
Thank you for your support and co-operation.
- Rohit
________________________________
From: Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 1:26:48 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
All,
I've started looking into reviewing/testing/merging of the PRs targeting 4.9+, I'll share some plans around 4.9.3.0 soon. Meanwhile, help in reporting any major/critical bugs and PRs we should consider reviewing/testing/merging. Thanks.
- Rohit
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>.
All,
We've helped with several PR reviews and merges recently, both in 4.9 and master.
We'll stop accepting any changes by end of next week (18 August), afterwards we'll only accept test and blocker fixes blocking the release.
Feel free to suggest any commits/fixes/PRs we should consider towards 4.9.3.0.
Following satisfactory test results (both Travis, Trillian and others) on 4.9 branch we'll cut 4.9.3.0 RC1 for voting.
Regards.
________________________________
From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 1:05:56 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Hi Rohit
I previous suggested these for 4.9.3.0
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after vRouter reboot)
I'd also like to suggest these:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1246 (unable to use reserved IP range in a network)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2201 (VPC VR doesn't respond to DNS requests from remote access vpn clients)
Thanks
Sean
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
-----Original Message-----
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 5:56 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
All,
We'll accept bugfixes on 4.9 branch till end of next week, following which I'll start release work towards 4.9.3.0 (LTS) release. Please help review outstanding PRs, share PRs that we should consider and advise/suggest issues that need to be reverted/backported, for example see: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
Thank you for your support and co-operation.
- Rohit
________________________________
From: Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 1:26:48 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
All,
I've started looking into reviewing/testing/merging of the PRs targeting 4.9+, I'll share some plans around 4.9.3.0 soon. Meanwhile, help in reporting any major/critical bugs and PRs we should consider reviewing/testing/merging. Thanks.
- Rohit
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>.
Hi Rohit
I previous suggested these for 4.9.3.0
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after vRouter reboot)
I'd also like to suggest these:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1246 (unable to use reserved IP range in a network)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2201 (VPC VR doesn't respond to DNS requests from remote access vpn clients)
Thanks
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 5:56 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
All,
We'll accept bugfixes on 4.9 branch till end of next week, following which I'll start release work towards 4.9.3.0 (LTS) release. Please help review outstanding PRs, share PRs that we should consider and advise/suggest issues that need to be reverted/backported, for example see: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
Thank you for your support and co-operation.
- Rohit
________________________________
From: Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 1:26:48 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
All,
I've started looking into reviewing/testing/merging of the PRs targeting 4.9+, I'll share some plans around 4.9.3.0 soon. Meanwhile, help in reporting any major/critical bugs and PRs we should consider reviewing/testing/merging. Thanks.
- Rohit
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>.
Hi Rohit
I previous suggested these for 4.9.3.0
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after vRouter reboot)
I'd also like to suggest these:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1246 (unable to use reserved IP range in a network)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2201 (VPC VR doesn't respond to DNS requests from remote access vpn clients)
Thanks
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 5:56 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
All,
We'll accept bugfixes on 4.9 branch till end of next week, following which I'll start release work towards 4.9.3.0 (LTS) release. Please help review outstanding PRs, share PRs that we should consider and advise/suggest issues that need to be reverted/backported, for example see: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
Thank you for your support and co-operation.
- Rohit
________________________________
From: Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 1:26:48 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
All,
I've started looking into reviewing/testing/merging of the PRs targeting 4.9+, I'll share some plans around 4.9.3.0 soon. Meanwhile, help in reporting any major/critical bugs and PRs we should consider reviewing/testing/merging. Thanks.
- Rohit
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>.
All,
We'll accept bugfixes on 4.9 branch till end of next week, following which I'll start release work towards 4.9.3.0 (LTS) release. Please help review outstanding PRs, share PRs that we should consider and advise/suggest issues that need to be reverted/backported, for example see: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
Thank you for your support and co-operation.
- Rohit
________________________________
From: Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 1:26:48 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
All,
I've started looking into reviewing/testing/merging of the PRs targeting 4.9+, I'll share some plans around 4.9.3.0 soon. Meanwhile, help in reporting any major/critical bugs and PRs we should consider reviewing/testing/merging. Thanks.
- Rohit
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>.
All,
We'll accept bugfixes on 4.9 branch till end of next week, following which I'll start release work towards 4.9.3.0 (LTS) release. Please help review outstanding PRs, share PRs that we should consider and advise/suggest issues that need to be reverted/backported, for example see: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
Thank you for your support and co-operation.
- Rohit
________________________________
From: Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 1:26:48 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
All,
I've started looking into reviewing/testing/merging of the PRs targeting 4.9+, I'll share some plans around 4.9.3.0 soon. Meanwhile, help in reporting any major/critical bugs and PRs we should consider reviewing/testing/merging. Thanks.
- Rohit
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>.
All,
I've started looking into reviewing/testing/merging of the PRs targeting 4.9+, I'll share some plans around 4.9.3.0 soon. Meanwhile, help in reporting any major/critical bugs and PRs we should consider reviewing/testing/merging. Thanks.
- Rohit
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>.
All,
I've started looking into reviewing/testing/merging of the PRs targeting 4.9+, I'll share some plans around 4.9.3.0 soon. Meanwhile, help in reporting any major/critical bugs and PRs we should consider reviewing/testing/merging. Thanks.
- Rohit
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>.
Lotic,
The specific PR has been merged on 4.9 branch and will make its way to future 4.9.3.0 release.
- Rohit
________________________________
From: Lotic Lists <li...@lotic.com.br>
Sent: 13 July 2017 17:47:36
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Hi Rohit.
I would suggest the 1829 [1]
It's a big problem with XenServer and more than 2 datadisks attached per VM (HVM)
[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
-----Original Message-----
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
Sent: quarta-feira, 12 de julho de 2017 11:42
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
All,
Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can freeze the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a release plan as soon as next week.
- Rohit
________________________________
From: Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl>
Sent: 12 July 2017 01:27:30
To: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Hi,
I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131
Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.
Wido
> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>:
>
>
> Hi Sean,
>
>
> Thanks for sharing.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> ________________________________
> From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0. We have been running all of these fixes for several months without issues. The code changes are all very easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
>
> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs
> scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of
> S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work
> after vRouter reboot)
>
> Thanks
> Sean
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> All,
>
>
> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.
>
>
> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
>
>
> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider reverting:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
>
>
> <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
>
>
> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>.
Lotic,
The specific PR has been merged on 4.9 branch and will make its way to future 4.9.3.0 release.
- Rohit
________________________________
From: Lotic Lists <li...@lotic.com.br>
Sent: 13 July 2017 17:47:36
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Hi Rohit.
I would suggest the 1829 [1]
It's a big problem with XenServer and more than 2 datadisks attached per VM (HVM)
[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
-----Original Message-----
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
Sent: quarta-feira, 12 de julho de 2017 11:42
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
All,
Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can freeze the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a release plan as soon as next week.
- Rohit
________________________________
From: Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl>
Sent: 12 July 2017 01:27:30
To: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Hi,
I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131
Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.
Wido
> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>:
>
>
> Hi Sean,
>
>
> Thanks for sharing.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> ________________________________
> From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0. We have been running all of these fixes for several months without issues. The code changes are all very easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
>
> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs
> scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of
> S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work
> after vRouter reboot)
>
> Thanks
> Sean
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> All,
>
>
> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.
>
>
> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
>
>
> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider reverting:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
>
>
> <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
>
>
> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Lotic Lists <li...@lotic.com.br>.
Hi Rohit.
I would suggest the 1829 [1]
It's a big problem with XenServer and more than 2 datadisks attached per VM (HVM)
[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
-----Original Message-----
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
Sent: quarta-feira, 12 de julho de 2017 11:42
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
All,
Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can freeze the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a release plan as soon as next week.
- Rohit
________________________________
From: Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl>
Sent: 12 July 2017 01:27:30
To: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Hi,
I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131
Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.
Wido
> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>:
>
>
> Hi Sean,
>
>
> Thanks for sharing.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> ________________________________
> From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0. We have been running all of these fixes for several months without issues. The code changes are all very easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
>
> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs
> scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of
> S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work
> after vRouter reboot)
>
> Thanks
> Sean
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> All,
>
>
> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.
>
>
> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
>
>
> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider reverting:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
>
>
> <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
>
>
> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>.
Outback,
I think there exists some initial support for XenServer 7.1 in 4.9.2.0, 4.9/branch however consider installing/upgrading to 4.10.0.0 (once it is announced) which should have the support.
- Rohit
________________________________
From: Outback Dingo <ou...@gmail.com>
Sent: 12 July 2017 21:22:53
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> All,
>
>
> Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can freeze the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a release plan as soon as next week.
>
>
Support for XenServer 7.1 would be nice....
> - Rohit
>
> ________________________________
> From: Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl>
> Sent: 12 July 2017 01:27:30
> To: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> Hi,
>
> I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131
>
> Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.
>
> Wido
>
>> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>:
>>
>>
>> Hi Sean,
>>
>>
>> Thanks for sharing.
>>
>>
>> - Rohit
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
>> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>>
>> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0. We have been running all of these fixes for several months without issues. The code changes are all very easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
>>
>> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after vRouter reboot)
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sean
>>
>> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
>> @shapeblue
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
>> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>>
>> All,
>>
>>
>> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.
>>
>>
>> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
>>
>>
>> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider reverting:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
>>
>>
>> <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
>>
>>
>> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
>>
>>
>> - Rohit
>>
>> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>>
>>
>>
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>.
Outback,
I think there exists some initial support for XenServer 7.1 in 4.9.2.0, 4.9/branch however consider installing/upgrading to 4.10.0.0 (once it is announced) which should have the support.
- Rohit
________________________________
From: Outback Dingo <ou...@gmail.com>
Sent: 12 July 2017 21:22:53
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> All,
>
>
> Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can freeze the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a release plan as soon as next week.
>
>
Support for XenServer 7.1 would be nice....
> - Rohit
>
> ________________________________
> From: Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl>
> Sent: 12 July 2017 01:27:30
> To: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> Hi,
>
> I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131
>
> Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.
>
> Wido
>
>> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>:
>>
>>
>> Hi Sean,
>>
>>
>> Thanks for sharing.
>>
>>
>> - Rohit
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
>> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>>
>> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0. We have been running all of these fixes for several months without issues. The code changes are all very easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
>>
>> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after vRouter reboot)
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sean
>>
>> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
>> @shapeblue
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
>> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>>
>> All,
>>
>>
>> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.
>>
>>
>> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
>>
>>
>> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider reverting:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
>>
>>
>> <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
>>
>>
>> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
>>
>>
>> - Rohit
>>
>> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>>
>>
>>
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>.
Rubens,
For LTS minor releases, we cannot consider features to limit the scope to only bugfixes and security fixes. Kindly consider installing/upgrading to ACS 4.10.0.0 once it's is announced.
- Rohit
________________________________
From: Rubens Malheiro <ru...@gmail.com>
Sent: 12 July 2017 21:27:50
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
What would be very interesting would be to enable the KVM snapshot feature
live
Maybe this would be a barrier to breaking over the limitation of PODS KVM
vs. XEN
And it would be a resource of immediate impact.
Sorry my english via translate
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Outback Dingo <ou...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>
> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> >
> > Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can
> freeze the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a
> release plan as soon as next week.
> >
> >
>
> Support for XenServer 7.1 would be nice....
>
>
> > - Rohit
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl>
> > Sent: 12 July 2017 01:27:30
> > To: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131
> >
> > Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.
> >
> > Wido
> >
> >> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> >:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Sean,
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks for sharing.
> >>
> >>
> >> - Rohit
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
> >> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
> >>
> >> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0. We have been running all
> of these fixes for several months without issues. The code changes are all
> very easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
> >>
> >> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs
> scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of
> S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work
> after vRouter reboot)
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Sean
> >>
> >> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> >> @shapeblue
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
> >> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
> >>
> >> All,
> >>
> >>
> >> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion
> around the next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a
> timeline, plans or dates to share but I would like to engage with the
> community to gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider
> for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.
> >>
> >>
> >> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that
> are new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major
> bugfixes and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any
> already committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
> >>
> >>
> >> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git
> log 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider
> reverting:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
> >>
> >>
> >> <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started
> backporting some fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following
> PR and raise objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or
> revert:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
> >>
> >>
> >> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider
> reviewing+merging on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
> >>
> >>
> >> - Rohit
> >>
> >> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> > @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
>
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Rubens Malheiro <ru...@gmail.com>.
What would be very interesting would be to enable the KVM snapshot feature
live
Maybe this would be a barrier to breaking over the limitation of PODS KVM
vs. XEN
And it would be a resource of immediate impact.
Sorry my english via translate
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Outback Dingo <ou...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>
> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> >
> > Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can
> freeze the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a
> release plan as soon as next week.
> >
> >
>
> Support for XenServer 7.1 would be nice....
>
>
> > - Rohit
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl>
> > Sent: 12 July 2017 01:27:30
> > To: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131
> >
> > Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.
> >
> > Wido
> >
> >> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> >:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Sean,
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks for sharing.
> >>
> >>
> >> - Rohit
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
> >> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
> >>
> >> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0. We have been running all
> of these fixes for several months without issues. The code changes are all
> very easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
> >>
> >> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs
> scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of
> S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work
> after vRouter reboot)
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Sean
> >>
> >> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> >> @shapeblue
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
> >> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
> >>
> >> All,
> >>
> >>
> >> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion
> around the next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a
> timeline, plans or dates to share but I would like to engage with the
> community to gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider
> for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.
> >>
> >>
> >> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that
> are new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major
> bugfixes and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any
> already committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
> >>
> >>
> >> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git
> log 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider
> reverting:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
> >>
> >>
> >> <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started
> backporting some fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following
> PR and raise objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or
> revert:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
> >>
> >>
> >> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider
> reviewing+merging on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
> >>
> >>
> >> - Rohit
> >>
> >> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com
> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> > @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Outback Dingo <ou...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> All,
>
>
> Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can freeze the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a release plan as soon as next week.
>
>
Support for XenServer 7.1 would be nice....
> - Rohit
>
> ________________________________
> From: Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl>
> Sent: 12 July 2017 01:27:30
> To: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> Hi,
>
> I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131
>
> Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.
>
> Wido
>
>> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>:
>>
>>
>> Hi Sean,
>>
>>
>> Thanks for sharing.
>>
>>
>> - Rohit
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
>> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>>
>> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0. We have been running all of these fixes for several months without issues. The code changes are all very easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
>>
>> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after vRouter reboot)
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sean
>>
>> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
>> @shapeblue
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
>> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>>
>> All,
>>
>>
>> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.
>>
>>
>> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
>>
>>
>> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider reverting:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
>>
>>
>> <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
>>
>>
>> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
>>
>>
>> - Rohit
>>
>> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>>
>>
>>
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Lotic Lists <li...@lotic.com.br>.
Hi Rohit.
I would suggest the 1829 [1]
It's a big problem with XenServer and more than 2 datadisks attached per VM (HVM)
[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
-----Original Message-----
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
Sent: quarta-feira, 12 de julho de 2017 11:42
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
All,
Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can freeze the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a release plan as soon as next week.
- Rohit
________________________________
From: Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl>
Sent: 12 July 2017 01:27:30
To: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Hi,
I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131
Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.
Wido
> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>:
>
>
> Hi Sean,
>
>
> Thanks for sharing.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> ________________________________
> From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0. We have been running all of these fixes for several months without issues. The code changes are all very easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
>
> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs
> scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of
> S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work
> after vRouter reboot)
>
> Thanks
> Sean
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> All,
>
>
> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.
>
>
> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
>
>
> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider reverting:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
>
>
> <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
>
>
> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Outback Dingo <ou...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> All,
>
>
> Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can freeze the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a release plan as soon as next week.
>
>
Support for XenServer 7.1 would be nice....
> - Rohit
>
> ________________________________
> From: Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl>
> Sent: 12 July 2017 01:27:30
> To: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> Hi,
>
> I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131
>
> Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.
>
> Wido
>
>> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>:
>>
>>
>> Hi Sean,
>>
>>
>> Thanks for sharing.
>>
>>
>> - Rohit
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
>> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>>
>> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0. We have been running all of these fixes for several months without issues. The code changes are all very easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
>>
>> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after vRouter reboot)
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sean
>>
>> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
>> @shapeblue
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
>> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>>
>> All,
>>
>>
>> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.
>>
>>
>> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
>>
>>
>> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider reverting:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
>>
>>
>> <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
>>
>>
>> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
>>
>>
>> - Rohit
>>
>> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>>
>>
>>
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>.
All,
Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can freeze the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a release plan as soon as next week.
- Rohit
________________________________
From: Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl>
Sent: 12 July 2017 01:27:30
To: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Hi,
I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131
Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.
Wido
> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>:
>
>
> Hi Sean,
>
>
> Thanks for sharing.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> ________________________________
> From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0. We have been running all of these fixes for several months without issues. The code changes are all very easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
>
> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after vRouter reboot)
>
> Thanks
> Sean
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> All,
>
>
> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.
>
>
> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
>
>
> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider reverting:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
>
>
> <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
>
>
> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>.
All,
Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can freeze the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a release plan as soon as next week.
- Rohit
________________________________
From: Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl>
Sent: 12 July 2017 01:27:30
To: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Hi,
I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131
Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.
Wido
> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>:
>
>
> Hi Sean,
>
>
> Thanks for sharing.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> ________________________________
> From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0. We have been running all of these fixes for several months without issues. The code changes are all very easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
>
> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after vRouter reboot)
>
> Thanks
> Sean
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> All,
>
>
> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.
>
>
> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
>
>
> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider reverting:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
>
>
> <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
>
>
> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl>.
Hi,
I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131
Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.
Wido
> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>:
>
>
> Hi Sean,
>
>
> Thanks for sharing.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> ________________________________
> From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0. We have been running all of these fixes for several months without issues. The code changes are all very easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
>
> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after vRouter reboot)
>
> Thanks
> Sean
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> All,
>
>
> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.
>
>
> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
>
>
> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider reverting:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
>
>
> <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
>
>
> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl>.
Hi,
I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131
Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.
Wido
> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>:
>
>
> Hi Sean,
>
>
> Thanks for sharing.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> ________________________________
> From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0. We have been running all of these fixes for several months without issues. The code changes are all very easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
>
> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after vRouter reboot)
>
> Thanks
> Sean
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> All,
>
>
> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.
>
>
> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
>
>
> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider reverting:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
>
>
> <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
>
>
> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>.
Hi Sean,
Thanks for sharing.
- Rohit
________________________________
From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0. We have been running all of these fixes for several months without issues. The code changes are all very easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after vRouter reboot)
Thanks
Sean
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
-----Original Message-----
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
All,
With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.
To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider reverting:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
- Rohit
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Rohit Yadav <ro...@shapeblue.com>.
Hi Sean,
Thanks for sharing.
- Rohit
________________________________
From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0. We have been running all of these fixes for several months without issues. The code changes are all very easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after vRouter reboot)
Thanks
Sean
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
-----Original Message-----
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
All,
With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.
To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider reverting:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
- Rohit
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>.
Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0. We have been running all of these fixes for several months without issues. The code changes are all very easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after vRouter reboot)
Thanks
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
All,
With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.
To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider reverting:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
- Rohit
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Posted by Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>.
Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0. We have been running all of these fixes for several months without issues. The code changes are all very easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after vRouter reboot)
Thanks
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
All,
With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.
To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider reverting:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
- Rohit
rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue