You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@kafka.apache.org by sham singh <si...@gmail.com> on 2017/12/20 00:07:38 UTC

MirrorMaker optimization - num.streams vs. MM processes

Hello - i've a question on optimizing MirrorMaker setup...
I've 2 topics, each with 12 partitions and i'm setting up MirrorMaker for
the two topics.
Is it preferable to have 3 Mirror Maker processes (on different m/c), with
num.streams = 4 (or 8)
OR
Have a singe Mirror Maker process, with num.streams = 12 (or 24)
what are the pros/cons of the 2 approaches ?

Appreciate your inputs on this.

Re: MirrorMaker optimization - num.streams vs. MM processes

Posted by Manikumar <ma...@gmail.com>.

To achive high-availability,  we need to run multiple instances of mirror
maker process.

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 5:37 AM, sham singh <si...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello - i've a question on optimizing MirrorMaker setup...
> I've 2 topics, each with 12 partitions and i'm setting up MirrorMaker for
> the two topics.
> Is it preferable to have 3 Mirror Maker processes (on different m/c), with
> num.streams = 4 (or 8)
> OR
> Have a singe Mirror Maker process, with num.streams = 12 (or 24)
> what are the pros/cons of the 2 approaches ?
>
> Appreciate your inputs on this.
>