You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to scm@geronimo.apache.org by gd...@apache.org on 2008/04/12 03:24:23 UTC
svn commit: r647361 - /geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml
Author: gdamour
Date: Fri Apr 11 18:24:12 2008
New Revision: 647361
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=647361&view=rev
Log:
upgrade to 2.0-M10
Modified:
geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml
Modified: geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml?rev=647361&r1=647360&r2=647361&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml (original)
+++ geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml Fri Apr 11 18:24:12 2008
@@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@
<dependency>
<groupId>org.codehaus.wadi</groupId>
<artifactId>wadi-aop</artifactId>
- <version>2.0-M9</version>
+ <version>2.0-M10</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
Re: svn commit: r647361 - /geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml
Posted by Gianny Damour <gi...@optusnet.com.au>.
Sorry for this mistake. It is now fixed.
Thanks for having reported it.
Gianny
On 15/04/2008, at 5:04 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Is there a reason you only updated wadi-aop to 2.0-M10 and not the
> rest of the WADI artifacts?
>
>
> -Donald
>
Re: svn commit: r647361 - /geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
Is there a reason you only updated wadi-aop to 2.0-M10 and not the rest
of the WADI artifacts?
-Donald
Gianny Damour wrote:
> Hello Joe,
>
> It is a change intended for the 2.1 branch as I would like G 2.1.1 to
> use WADI 2.0-M10.
>
> It fixes a replication bug: the dirty flag of a session is reset when a
> null value is retrieved from a session. As a consequence, session state
> updates are not pushed to replication peers upon completion of request
> handling. Hence, sessions recovered from replication servers following a
> peer crash may not reflect the latest state.
>
> Thanks,
> Gianny
>
> On 12/04/2008, at 1:56 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>>
>> Gianny,
>>
>> Was this change perhaps intended for trunk rather than branches/2.1
>> given that 2.0-M10 was just released a few days ago? If you did
>> intend it for 2.1, can you provide some more information on why it is
>> necessary? We are nearly ready to branch for 2.1.1 and I'm trying to
>> keep the changes in the 2.1 branch to an absolute minimum.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Joe
>>
>>
>> gdamour@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: gdamour
>>> Date: Fri Apr 11 18:24:12 2008
>>> New Revision: 647361
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=647361&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> upgrade to 2.0-M10
>>> Modified:
>>> geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml
>>> Modified: geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml
>>> URL:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml?rev=647361&r1=647360&r2=647361&view=diff
>>>
>>> ==============================================================================
>>>
>>> --- geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml (original)
>>> +++ geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml Fri Apr 11 18:24:12 2008
>>> @@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@
>>> <dependency>
>>> <groupId>org.codehaus.wadi</groupId>
>>> <artifactId>wadi-aop</artifactId>
>>> - <version>2.0-M9</version>
>>> + <version>2.0-M10</version>
>>> </dependency>
>>> <dependency>
>>
>
>
Re: svn commit: r647361 - /geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
Thanks for the clarification Gianny.
Joe
Gianny Damour wrote:
> Hello Joe,
>
> It is a change intended for the 2.1 branch as I would like G 2.1.1 to
> use WADI 2.0-M10.
>
> It fixes a replication bug: the dirty flag of a session is reset when a
> null value is retrieved from a session. As a consequence, session state
> updates are not pushed to replication peers upon completion of request
> handling. Hence, sessions recovered from replication servers following a
> peer crash may not reflect the latest state.
>
> Thanks,
> Gianny
>
> On 12/04/2008, at 1:56 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>>
>> Gianny,
>>
>> Was this change perhaps intended for trunk rather than branches/2.1
>> given that 2.0-M10 was just released a few days ago? If you did
>> intend it for 2.1, can you provide some more information on why it is
>> necessary? We are nearly ready to branch for 2.1.1 and I'm trying to
>> keep the changes in the 2.1 branch to an absolute minimum.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Joe
>>
>>
>> gdamour@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: gdamour
>>> Date: Fri Apr 11 18:24:12 2008
>>> New Revision: 647361
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=647361&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> upgrade to 2.0-M10
>>> Modified:
>>> geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml
>>> Modified: geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml
>>> URL:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml?rev=647361&r1=647360&r2=647361&view=diff
>>>
>>> ==============================================================================
>>>
>>> --- geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml (original)
>>> +++ geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml Fri Apr 11 18:24:12 2008
>>> @@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@
>>> <dependency>
>>> <groupId>org.codehaus.wadi</groupId>
>>> <artifactId>wadi-aop</artifactId>
>>> - <version>2.0-M9</version>
>>> + <version>2.0-M10</version>
>>> </dependency>
>>> <dependency>
>>
>
>
Re: svn commit: r647361 - /geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml
Posted by Gianny Damour <gi...@optusnet.com.au>.
Hello Joe,
It is a change intended for the 2.1 branch as I would like G 2.1.1 to
use WADI 2.0-M10.
It fixes a replication bug: the dirty flag of a session is reset when
a null value is retrieved from a session. As a consequence, session
state updates are not pushed to replication peers upon completion of
request handling. Hence, sessions recovered from replication servers
following a peer crash may not reflect the latest state.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 12/04/2008, at 1:56 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>
> Gianny,
>
> Was this change perhaps intended for trunk rather than branches/2.1
> given that 2.0-M10 was just released a few days ago? If you did
> intend it for 2.1, can you provide some more information on why it
> is necessary? We are nearly ready to branch for 2.1.1 and I'm
> trying to keep the changes in the 2.1 branch to an absolute minimum.
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>
>
> gdamour@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: gdamour
>> Date: Fri Apr 11 18:24:12 2008
>> New Revision: 647361
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=647361&view=rev
>> Log:
>> upgrade to 2.0-M10
>> Modified:
>> geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml
>> Modified: geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/branches/2.1/
>> pom.xml?rev=647361&r1=647360&r2=647361&view=diff
>> =====================================================================
>> =========
>> --- geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml (original)
>> +++ geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml Fri Apr 11 18:24:12 2008
>> @@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.codehaus.wadi</groupId>
>> <artifactId>wadi-aop</artifactId>
>> - <version>2.0-M9</version>
>> + <version>2.0-M10</version>
>> </dependency>
>> <dependency>
>
Re: svn commit: r647361 - /geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
Gianny,
Was this change perhaps intended for trunk rather than branches/2.1
given that 2.0-M10 was just released a few days ago? If you did intend
it for 2.1, can you provide some more information on why it is
necessary? We are nearly ready to branch for 2.1.1 and I'm trying to
keep the changes in the 2.1 branch to an absolute minimum.
Thanks,
Joe
gdamour@apache.org wrote:
> Author: gdamour
> Date: Fri Apr 11 18:24:12 2008
> New Revision: 647361
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=647361&view=rev
> Log:
> upgrade to 2.0-M10
>
> Modified:
> geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml
>
> Modified: geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml?rev=647361&r1=647360&r2=647361&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml (original)
> +++ geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml Fri Apr 11 18:24:12 2008
> @@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.codehaus.wadi</groupId>
> <artifactId>wadi-aop</artifactId>
> - <version>2.0-M9</version>
> + <version>2.0-M10</version>
> </dependency>
>
> <dependency>
>
>
>