You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@hbase.apache.org by Rajeshkumar J <ra...@gmail.com> on 2016/11/04 05:02:41 UTC
Hbase 1.1.1 API documentation link
Hi,
We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1. Some methods of hbase 0.94
are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone post me the link for Api
documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't find that.
Thanks
Re: Hbase 1.1.1 API documentation link
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#datamodel needs to say more? Tell us what
you want explained and we'll fix. Thanks,
S
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Denise Rogers <da...@aol.com> wrote:
> That's my understanding as well. But there's no documentation that states
> that.
>
> Regards,
> Denise
>
>
> Sent from mi iPhone
>
> > On Nov 10, 2016, at 7:36 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Denise Rogers <da...@aol.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Does the Doc also include information on updates and what actually
> happens
> >> to record? Are the values actually replaced or is the old record aged
> out
> >> and replaced with a new on?
> >>
> >>
> > You are asking about HBase in general Denise? For all HBase versions, we
> do
> > not replace records. We add a new one.
> >
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> Regards,
> >> Denise
> >>
> >>
> >> Sent from mi iPhone
> >>
> >>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 1:06 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I think most folks are looking for javadocs, which vary considerably
> >>>>> across minor release lines.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> Sorry. Yes. Indeed that is what Rajeshkumar asked originally.
> >>>>
> >>>> As penance for my derail of the thread, let me work on putting up a
> link
> >>>> to 1.1. doc. this evening.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> This is taking a while. Publication of the site seems to down at the
> >> moment
> >>> and our little site builder jenkins job is stalled trying to find a
> host
> >> to
> >>> run its build on.
> >>>
> >>> Meantime, I got a snapshot of 1.1 docs up here:
> >>> http://hbase.apache.org/1.1/devapidocs/index.html
> >>>
> >>> Will add links and the 1.1.7 doc when build comes back.
> >>>
> >>> St.Ack
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> St.Ack
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We do have an hbase book for 0.94 specially:
> >>>>>>> http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/book.html, and it might be a good
> >>>>> question
> >>>>>>> that shall we supply similar website of different branches for user
> >> or
> >>>>>>> always require them to generate the site by themselves? Current
> hbase
> >>>>> book
> >>>>>>> (
> >>>>>>> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html) contains some new features only
> >>>>> for 2.0
> >>>>>>> (plz correct me if I'm wrong) so might not be proper for all users
> to
> >>>>> refer
> >>>>>>> to?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> btw, if plan to use branch-1.1 release, I'd suggest to use versions
> >>>>> later
> >>>>>>> than (including) 1.1.4 because of HBASE-14460 (
> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14460, which fixes
> >>>>> performance
> >>>>>>> regression), JFYI @Rajeshkumar
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>> Yu
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> This is a perennial (... that we should publish per-version doc.)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Truth be told, we don't do the work to maintain version specific
> >>>>>> documentation. RMs usually copy the current state of the master doc
> >> into
> >>>>>> their branch before cutting an RC so they get the 'latest' changes.
> >> Doc
> >>>>> is
> >>>>>> done up on the master branch. Doc will have callouts if a
> >>>>> version-specific
> >>>>>> config or feature but we are probably erratic in our practice here
> >> (and
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>> the converse, deprecating the old and no longer supported).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Doc seems to change at a slow rate so maybe its not so bad that this
> >> is
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>> case.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> That said, if the 1.1 doc has big differences from the master doc.,
> we
> >>>>>> could do the same was we did for 0.94 -- making a subdir for 1.1.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> St.Ack
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 7 November 2016 at 13:06, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I actually run the (modified) command in your first email quite
> >>>>> often -
> >>>>>>>> when building tar balls for cluster testing.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> In that case, site goal is not used.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> In hindsight, you're probably right, Ted. I was just copying from
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> book
> >>>>>>>>> and forgot to remove that execution :)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Ted Yu wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> If I am not mistaken, the 'assembly:single' goal is not needed
> for
> >>>>>>>>>> building
> >>>>>>>>>> the site.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser<
> josh.elser@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published on the
> >>>>> website.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Something similar to the following should build it for you
> >>>>> locally.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 1. git checkout rel/1.1.1
> >>>>>>>>>>> 2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate site
> >>>>>>>> assembly:single`
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Rajeshkumar J wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1. Some methods of
> >>>>>>> hbase
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 0.94
> >>>>>>>>>>>> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone post me the link
> >>>>> for
> >>>>>>> Api
> >>>>>>>>>>>> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't find that.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> busbey
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: Hbase 1.1.1 API documentation link
Posted by Denise Rogers <da...@aol.com>.
That's my understanding as well. But there's no documentation that states that.
Regards,
Denise
Sent from mi iPhone
> On Nov 10, 2016, at 7:36 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Denise Rogers <da...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> Does the Doc also include information on updates and what actually happens
>> to record? Are the values actually replaced or is the old record aged out
>> and replaced with a new on?
>>
>>
> You are asking about HBase in general Denise? For all HBase versions, we do
> not replace records. We add a new one.
>
> St.Ack
>
>
>
>
>> Regards,
>> Denise
>>
>>
>> Sent from mi iPhone
>>
>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 1:06 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I think most folks are looking for javadocs, which vary considerably
>>>>> across minor release lines.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Sorry. Yes. Indeed that is what Rajeshkumar asked originally.
>>>>
>>>> As penance for my derail of the thread, let me work on putting up a link
>>>> to 1.1. doc. this evening.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> This is taking a while. Publication of the site seems to down at the
>> moment
>>> and our little site builder jenkins job is stalled trying to find a host
>> to
>>> run its build on.
>>>
>>> Meantime, I got a snapshot of 1.1 docs up here:
>>> http://hbase.apache.org/1.1/devapidocs/index.html
>>>
>>> Will add links and the 1.1.7 doc when build comes back.
>>>
>>> St.Ack
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> St.Ack
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We do have an hbase book for 0.94 specially:
>>>>>>> http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/book.html, and it might be a good
>>>>> question
>>>>>>> that shall we supply similar website of different branches for user
>> or
>>>>>>> always require them to generate the site by themselves? Current hbase
>>>>> book
>>>>>>> (
>>>>>>> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html) contains some new features only
>>>>> for 2.0
>>>>>>> (plz correct me if I'm wrong) so might not be proper for all users to
>>>>> refer
>>>>>>> to?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> btw, if plan to use branch-1.1 release, I'd suggest to use versions
>>>>> later
>>>>>>> than (including) 1.1.4 because of HBASE-14460 (
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14460, which fixes
>>>>> performance
>>>>>>> regression), JFYI @Rajeshkumar
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>> Yu
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a perennial (... that we should publish per-version doc.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Truth be told, we don't do the work to maintain version specific
>>>>>> documentation. RMs usually copy the current state of the master doc
>> into
>>>>>> their branch before cutting an RC so they get the 'latest' changes.
>> Doc
>>>>> is
>>>>>> done up on the master branch. Doc will have callouts if a
>>>>> version-specific
>>>>>> config or feature but we are probably erratic in our practice here
>> (and
>>>>> in
>>>>>> the converse, deprecating the old and no longer supported).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Doc seems to change at a slow rate so maybe its not so bad that this
>> is
>>>>> the
>>>>>> case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That said, if the 1.1 doc has big differences from the master doc., we
>>>>>> could do the same was we did for 0.94 -- making a subdir for 1.1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> St.Ack
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 7 November 2016 at 13:06, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I actually run the (modified) command in your first email quite
>>>>> often -
>>>>>>>> when building tar balls for cluster testing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In that case, site goal is not used.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In hindsight, you're probably right, Ted. I was just copying from
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> book
>>>>>>>>> and forgot to remove that execution :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ted Yu wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If I am not mistaken, the 'assembly:single' goal is not needed for
>>>>>>>>>> building
>>>>>>>>>> the site.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published on the
>>>>> website.
>>>>>>>>>>> Something similar to the following should build it for you
>>>>> locally.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. git checkout rel/1.1.1
>>>>>>>>>>> 2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate site
>>>>>>>> assembly:single`
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Rajeshkumar J wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1. Some methods of
>>>>>>> hbase
>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.94
>>>>>>>>>>>> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone post me the link
>>>>> for
>>>>>>> Api
>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't find that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> busbey
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: Hbase 1.1.1 API documentation link
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Denise Rogers <da...@aol.com> wrote:
> Does the Doc also include information on updates and what actually happens
> to record? Are the values actually replaced or is the old record aged out
> and replaced with a new on?
>
>
You are asking about HBase in general Denise? For all HBase versions, we do
not replace records. We add a new one.
St.Ack
> Regards,
> Denise
>
>
> Sent from mi iPhone
>
> > On Nov 9, 2016, at 1:06 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I think most folks are looking for javadocs, which vary considerably
> >>> across minor release lines.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Sorry. Yes. Indeed that is what Rajeshkumar asked originally.
> >>
> >> As penance for my derail of the thread, let me work on putting up a link
> >> to 1.1. doc. this evening.
> >>
> >>
> > This is taking a while. Publication of the site seems to down at the
> moment
> > and our little site builder jenkins job is stalled trying to find a host
> to
> > run its build on.
> >
> > Meantime, I got a snapshot of 1.1 docs up here:
> > http://hbase.apache.org/1.1/devapidocs/index.html
> >
> > Will add links and the 1.1.7 doc when build comes back.
> >
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> >
> >> Thanks,
> >> St.Ack
> >>
> >>
> >>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We do have an hbase book for 0.94 specially:
> >>>>> http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/book.html, and it might be a good
> >>> question
> >>>>> that shall we supply similar website of different branches for user
> or
> >>>>> always require them to generate the site by themselves? Current hbase
> >>> book
> >>>>> (
> >>>>> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html) contains some new features only
> >>> for 2.0
> >>>>> (plz correct me if I'm wrong) so might not be proper for all users to
> >>> refer
> >>>>> to?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> btw, if plan to use branch-1.1 release, I'd suggest to use versions
> >>> later
> >>>>> than (including) 1.1.4 because of HBASE-14460 (
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14460, which fixes
> >>> performance
> >>>>> regression), JFYI @Rajeshkumar
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>> Yu
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> This is a perennial (... that we should publish per-version doc.)
> >>>>
> >>>> Truth be told, we don't do the work to maintain version specific
> >>>> documentation. RMs usually copy the current state of the master doc
> into
> >>>> their branch before cutting an RC so they get the 'latest' changes.
> Doc
> >>> is
> >>>> done up on the master branch. Doc will have callouts if a
> >>> version-specific
> >>>> config or feature but we are probably erratic in our practice here
> (and
> >>> in
> >>>> the converse, deprecating the old and no longer supported).
> >>>>
> >>>> Doc seems to change at a slow rate so maybe its not so bad that this
> is
> >>> the
> >>>> case.
> >>>>
> >>>> That said, if the 1.1 doc has big differences from the master doc., we
> >>>> could do the same was we did for 0.94 -- making a subdir for 1.1.
> >>>>
> >>>> St.Ack
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> On 7 November 2016 at 13:06, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I actually run the (modified) command in your first email quite
> >>> often -
> >>>>>> when building tar balls for cluster testing.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In that case, site goal is not used.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In hindsight, you're probably right, Ted. I was just copying from
> >>> the
> >>>>>> book
> >>>>>>> and forgot to remove that execution :)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Ted Yu wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If I am not mistaken, the 'assembly:single' goal is not needed for
> >>>>>>>> building
> >>>>>>>> the site.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published on the
> >>> website.
> >>>>>>>>> Something similar to the following should build it for you
> >>> locally.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 1. git checkout rel/1.1.1
> >>>>>>>>> 2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate site
> >>>>>> assembly:single`
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Rajeshkumar J wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1. Some methods of
> >>>>> hbase
> >>>>>>>>>> 0.94
> >>>>>>>>>> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone post me the link
> >>> for
> >>>>> Api
> >>>>>>>>>> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't find that.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> busbey
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: Hbase 1.1.1 API documentation link
Posted by Denise Rogers <da...@aol.com>.
Does the Doc also include information on updates and what actually happens to record? Are the values actually replaced or is the old record aged out and replaced with a new on?
Regards,
Denise
Sent from mi iPhone
> On Nov 9, 2016, at 1:06 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think most folks are looking for javadocs, which vary considerably
>>> across minor release lines.
>>>
>>>
>> Sorry. Yes. Indeed that is what Rajeshkumar asked originally.
>>
>> As penance for my derail of the thread, let me work on putting up a link
>> to 1.1. doc. this evening.
>>
>>
> This is taking a while. Publication of the site seems to down at the moment
> and our little site builder jenkins job is stalled trying to find a host to
> run its build on.
>
> Meantime, I got a snapshot of 1.1 docs up here:
> http://hbase.apache.org/1.1/devapidocs/index.html
>
> Will add links and the 1.1.7 doc when build comes back.
>
> St.Ack
>
>
>
>> Thanks,
>> St.Ack
>>
>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> We do have an hbase book for 0.94 specially:
>>>>> http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/book.html, and it might be a good
>>> question
>>>>> that shall we supply similar website of different branches for user or
>>>>> always require them to generate the site by themselves? Current hbase
>>> book
>>>>> (
>>>>> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html) contains some new features only
>>> for 2.0
>>>>> (plz correct me if I'm wrong) so might not be proper for all users to
>>> refer
>>>>> to?
>>>>>
>>>>> btw, if plan to use branch-1.1 release, I'd suggest to use versions
>>> later
>>>>> than (including) 1.1.4 because of HBASE-14460 (
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14460, which fixes
>>> performance
>>>>> regression), JFYI @Rajeshkumar
>>>>>
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>> Yu
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> This is a perennial (... that we should publish per-version doc.)
>>>>
>>>> Truth be told, we don't do the work to maintain version specific
>>>> documentation. RMs usually copy the current state of the master doc into
>>>> their branch before cutting an RC so they get the 'latest' changes. Doc
>>> is
>>>> done up on the master branch. Doc will have callouts if a
>>> version-specific
>>>> config or feature but we are probably erratic in our practice here (and
>>> in
>>>> the converse, deprecating the old and no longer supported).
>>>>
>>>> Doc seems to change at a slow rate so maybe its not so bad that this is
>>> the
>>>> case.
>>>>
>>>> That said, if the 1.1 doc has big differences from the master doc., we
>>>> could do the same was we did for 0.94 -- making a subdir for 1.1.
>>>>
>>>> St.Ack
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> On 7 November 2016 at 13:06, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I actually run the (modified) command in your first email quite
>>> often -
>>>>>> when building tar balls for cluster testing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In that case, site goal is not used.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In hindsight, you're probably right, Ted. I was just copying from
>>> the
>>>>>> book
>>>>>>> and forgot to remove that execution :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ted Yu wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If I am not mistaken, the 'assembly:single' goal is not needed for
>>>>>>>> building
>>>>>>>> the site.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published on the
>>> website.
>>>>>>>>> Something similar to the following should build it for you
>>> locally.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1. git checkout rel/1.1.1
>>>>>>>>> 2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate site
>>>>>> assembly:single`
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rajeshkumar J wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1. Some methods of
>>>>> hbase
>>>>>>>>>> 0.94
>>>>>>>>>> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone post me the link
>>> for
>>>>> Api
>>>>>>>>>> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't find that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> busbey
>>>
>>
>>
Re: Hbase 1.1.1 API documentation link
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> I think most folks are looking for javadocs, which vary considerably
>> across minor release lines.
>>
>>
> Sorry. Yes. Indeed that is what Rajeshkumar asked originally.
>
> As penance for my derail of the thread, let me work on putting up a link
> to 1.1. doc. this evening.
>
>
This is taking a while. Publication of the site seems to down at the moment
and our little site builder jenkins job is stalled trying to find a host to
run its build on.
Meantime, I got a snapshot of 1.1 docs up here:
http://hbase.apache.org/1.1/devapidocs/index.html
Will add links and the 1.1.7 doc when build comes back.
St.Ack
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>
>
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> We do have an hbase book for 0.94 specially:
>> >> http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/book.html, and it might be a good
>> question
>> >> that shall we supply similar website of different branches for user or
>> >> always require them to generate the site by themselves? Current hbase
>> book
>> >> (
>> >> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html) contains some new features only
>> for 2.0
>> >> (plz correct me if I'm wrong) so might not be proper for all users to
>> refer
>> >> to?
>> >>
>> >> btw, if plan to use branch-1.1 release, I'd suggest to use versions
>> later
>> >> than (including) 1.1.4 because of HBASE-14460 (
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14460, which fixes
>> performance
>> >> regression), JFYI @Rajeshkumar
>> >>
>> >> Best Regards,
>> >> Yu
>> >>
>> >>
>> > This is a perennial (... that we should publish per-version doc.)
>> >
>> > Truth be told, we don't do the work to maintain version specific
>> > documentation. RMs usually copy the current state of the master doc into
>> > their branch before cutting an RC so they get the 'latest' changes. Doc
>> is
>> > done up on the master branch. Doc will have callouts if a
>> version-specific
>> > config or feature but we are probably erratic in our practice here (and
>> in
>> > the converse, deprecating the old and no longer supported).
>> >
>> > Doc seems to change at a slow rate so maybe its not so bad that this is
>> the
>> > case.
>> >
>> > That said, if the 1.1 doc has big differences from the master doc., we
>> > could do the same was we did for 0.94 -- making a subdir for 1.1.
>> >
>> > St.Ack
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> On 7 November 2016 at 13:06, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I actually run the (modified) command in your first email quite
>> often -
>> >> > when building tar balls for cluster testing.
>> >> >
>> >> > In that case, site goal is not used.
>> >> >
>> >> > Cheers
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > In hindsight, you're probably right, Ted. I was just copying from
>> the
>> >> > book
>> >> > > and forgot to remove that execution :)
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Ted Yu wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> If I am not mistaken, the 'assembly:single' goal is not needed for
>> >> > >> building
>> >> > >> the site.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Cheers
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Hi,
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>> I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published on the
>> website.
>> >> > >>> Something similar to the following should build it for you
>> locally.
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>> 1. git checkout rel/1.1.1
>> >> > >>> 2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate site
>> >> > assembly:single`
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>> Rajeshkumar J wrote:
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>> Hi,
>> >> > >>>>
>> >> > >>>> We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1. Some methods of
>> >> hbase
>> >> > >>>> 0.94
>> >> > >>>> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone post me the link
>> for
>> >> Api
>> >> > >>>> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't find that.
>> >> > >>>>
>> >> > >>>> Thanks
>> >> > >>>>
>> >> > >>>>
>> >> > >>>>
>> >> > >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> busbey
>>
>
>
Re: Hbase 1.1.1 API documentation link
Posted by Denise Rogers <da...@aol.com>.
Cool! Thanks Josh! I read the section of the guide that supports updates.
Thanks again for validating this.
Regards,
Denise
Sent from mi iPhone
> On Nov 11, 2016, at 4:39 PM, Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Your understanding is incorrect. You can update existing rows :)
>
> Would encourage you to read through the HBase book that Stack had earlier sent. It covers simple architecture questions like this.
>
> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html
>
> Denise Rogers wrote:
>> In reading the material in the link you sent. It seems that you can update an existing row through the put command.
>>
>> I was of the understanding that hbase does not support updates to existing rows.
>>
>> I just need a definitive rule on updates in hbase.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Denise
>>
>>
>> Sent from mi iPhone
>>
>>> On Nov 11, 2016, at 1:54 PM, Stack<st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Link to 1.1. docs is not up. See under 'Documentation and API' tab. See the
>>> tail of the menu. Just above the 0.94 item, there is a new 1.1 doc.
>>>
>>> St.Ack
>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Stack<st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Sean Busbey<bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I think most folks are looking for javadocs, which vary considerably
>>>>> across minor release lines.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Sorry. Yes. Indeed that is what Rajeshkumar asked originally.
>>>>
>>>> As penance for my derail of the thread, let me work on putting up a link
>>>> to 1.1. doc. this evening.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> St.Ack
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Stack<st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Yu Li<ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We do have an hbase book for 0.94 specially:
>>>>>>> http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/book.html, and it might be a good
>>>>> question
>>>>>>> that shall we supply similar website of different branches for user or
>>>>>>> always require them to generate the site by themselves? Current hbase
>>>>> book
>>>>>>> (
>>>>>>> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html) contains some new features only
>>>>> for 2.0
>>>>>>> (plz correct me if I'm wrong) so might not be proper for all users to
>>>>> refer
>>>>>>> to?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> btw, if plan to use branch-1.1 release, I'd suggest to use versions
>>>>> later
>>>>>>> than (including) 1.1.4 because of HBASE-14460 (
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14460, which fixes
>>>>> performance
>>>>>>> regression), JFYI @Rajeshkumar
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>> Yu
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a perennial (... that we should publish per-version doc.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Truth be told, we don't do the work to maintain version specific
>>>>>> documentation. RMs usually copy the current state of the master doc into
>>>>>> their branch before cutting an RC so they get the 'latest' changes. Doc
>>>>> is
>>>>>> done up on the master branch. Doc will have callouts if a
>>>>> version-specific
>>>>>> config or feature but we are probably erratic in our practice here (and
>>>>> in
>>>>>> the converse, deprecating the old and no longer supported).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Doc seems to change at a slow rate so maybe its not so bad that this is
>>>>> the
>>>>>> case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That said, if the 1.1 doc has big differences from the master doc., we
>>>>>> could do the same was we did for 0.94 -- making a subdir for 1.1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> St.Ack
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 7 November 2016 at 13:06, Ted Yu<yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I actually run the (modified) command in your first email quite
>>>>> often -
>>>>>>>> when building tar balls for cluster testing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In that case, site goal is not used.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In hindsight, you're probably right, Ted. I was just copying from
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> book
>>>>>>>>> and forgot to remove that execution :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ted Yu wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If I am not mistaken, the 'assembly:single' goal is not needed for
>>>>>>>>>> building
>>>>>>>>>> the site.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published on the
>>>>> website.
>>>>>>>>>>> Something similar to the following should build it for you
>>>>> locally.
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. git checkout rel/1.1.1
>>>>>>>>>>> 2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate site
>>>>>>>> assembly:single`
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Rajeshkumar J wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>> We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1. Some methods of
>>>>>>> hbase
>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.94
>>>>>>>>>>>> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone post me the link
>>>>> for
>>>>>>> Api
>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't find that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> busbey
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
Re: Hbase 1.1.1 API documentation link
Posted by Josh Elser <el...@apache.org>.
Your understanding is incorrect. You can update existing rows :)
Would encourage you to read through the HBase book that Stack had
earlier sent. It covers simple architecture questions like this.
http://hbase.apache.org/book.html
Denise Rogers wrote:
> In reading the material in the link you sent. It seems that you can update an existing row through the put command.
>
> I was of the understanding that hbase does not support updates to existing rows.
>
> I just need a definitive rule on updates in hbase.
>
> Regards,
> Denise
>
>
> Sent from mi iPhone
>
>> On Nov 11, 2016, at 1:54 PM, Stack<st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>
>> Link to 1.1. docs is not up. See under 'Documentation and API' tab. See the
>> tail of the menu. Just above the 0.94 item, there is a new 1.1 doc.
>>
>> St.Ack
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Stack<st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Sean Busbey<bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I think most folks are looking for javadocs, which vary considerably
>>>> across minor release lines.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Sorry. Yes. Indeed that is what Rajeshkumar asked originally.
>>>
>>> As penance for my derail of the thread, let me work on putting up a link
>>> to 1.1. doc. this evening.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> St.Ack
>>>
>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Stack<st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Yu Li<ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We do have an hbase book for 0.94 specially:
>>>>>> http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/book.html, and it might be a good
>>>> question
>>>>>> that shall we supply similar website of different branches for user or
>>>>>> always require them to generate the site by themselves? Current hbase
>>>> book
>>>>>> (
>>>>>> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html) contains some new features only
>>>> for 2.0
>>>>>> (plz correct me if I'm wrong) so might not be proper for all users to
>>>> refer
>>>>>> to?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> btw, if plan to use branch-1.1 release, I'd suggest to use versions
>>>> later
>>>>>> than (including) 1.1.4 because of HBASE-14460 (
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14460, which fixes
>>>> performance
>>>>>> regression), JFYI @Rajeshkumar
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>> Yu
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> This is a perennial (... that we should publish per-version doc.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Truth be told, we don't do the work to maintain version specific
>>>>> documentation. RMs usually copy the current state of the master doc into
>>>>> their branch before cutting an RC so they get the 'latest' changes. Doc
>>>> is
>>>>> done up on the master branch. Doc will have callouts if a
>>>> version-specific
>>>>> config or feature but we are probably erratic in our practice here (and
>>>> in
>>>>> the converse, deprecating the old and no longer supported).
>>>>>
>>>>> Doc seems to change at a slow rate so maybe its not so bad that this is
>>>> the
>>>>> case.
>>>>>
>>>>> That said, if the 1.1 doc has big differences from the master doc., we
>>>>> could do the same was we did for 0.94 -- making a subdir for 1.1.
>>>>>
>>>>> St.Ack
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 7 November 2016 at 13:06, Ted Yu<yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I actually run the (modified) command in your first email quite
>>>> often -
>>>>>>> when building tar balls for cluster testing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In that case, site goal is not used.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> In hindsight, you're probably right, Ted. I was just copying from
>>>> the
>>>>>>> book
>>>>>>>> and forgot to remove that execution :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ted Yu wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If I am not mistaken, the 'assembly:single' goal is not needed for
>>>>>>>>> building
>>>>>>>>> the site.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published on the
>>>> website.
>>>>>>>>>> Something similar to the following should build it for you
>>>> locally.
>>>>>>>>>> 1. git checkout rel/1.1.1
>>>>>>>>>> 2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate site
>>>>>>> assembly:single`
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Rajeshkumar J wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>> We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1. Some methods of
>>>>>> hbase
>>>>>>>>>>> 0.94
>>>>>>>>>>> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone post me the link
>>>> for
>>>>>> Api
>>>>>>>>>>> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't find that.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> busbey
>>>>
>>>
>
Re: Hbase 1.1.1 API documentation link
Posted by Denise Rogers <da...@aol.com>.
In reading the material in the link you sent. It seems that you can update an existing row through the put command.
I was of the understanding that hbase does not support updates to existing rows.
I just need a definitive rule on updates in hbase.
Regards,
Denise
Sent from mi iPhone
> On Nov 11, 2016, at 1:54 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> Link to 1.1. docs is not up. See under 'Documentation and API' tab. See the
> tail of the menu. Just above the 0.94 item, there is a new 1.1 doc.
>
> St.Ack
>
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think most folks are looking for javadocs, which vary considerably
>>> across minor release lines.
>>>
>>>
>> Sorry. Yes. Indeed that is what Rajeshkumar asked originally.
>>
>> As penance for my derail of the thread, let me work on putting up a link
>> to 1.1. doc. this evening.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> St.Ack
>>
>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> We do have an hbase book for 0.94 specially:
>>>>> http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/book.html, and it might be a good
>>> question
>>>>> that shall we supply similar website of different branches for user or
>>>>> always require them to generate the site by themselves? Current hbase
>>> book
>>>>> (
>>>>> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html) contains some new features only
>>> for 2.0
>>>>> (plz correct me if I'm wrong) so might not be proper for all users to
>>> refer
>>>>> to?
>>>>>
>>>>> btw, if plan to use branch-1.1 release, I'd suggest to use versions
>>> later
>>>>> than (including) 1.1.4 because of HBASE-14460 (
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14460, which fixes
>>> performance
>>>>> regression), JFYI @Rajeshkumar
>>>>>
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>> Yu
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> This is a perennial (... that we should publish per-version doc.)
>>>>
>>>> Truth be told, we don't do the work to maintain version specific
>>>> documentation. RMs usually copy the current state of the master doc into
>>>> their branch before cutting an RC so they get the 'latest' changes. Doc
>>> is
>>>> done up on the master branch. Doc will have callouts if a
>>> version-specific
>>>> config or feature but we are probably erratic in our practice here (and
>>> in
>>>> the converse, deprecating the old and no longer supported).
>>>>
>>>> Doc seems to change at a slow rate so maybe its not so bad that this is
>>> the
>>>> case.
>>>>
>>>> That said, if the 1.1 doc has big differences from the master doc., we
>>>> could do the same was we did for 0.94 -- making a subdir for 1.1.
>>>>
>>>> St.Ack
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> On 7 November 2016 at 13:06, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I actually run the (modified) command in your first email quite
>>> often -
>>>>>> when building tar balls for cluster testing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In that case, site goal is not used.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In hindsight, you're probably right, Ted. I was just copying from
>>> the
>>>>>> book
>>>>>>> and forgot to remove that execution :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ted Yu wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If I am not mistaken, the 'assembly:single' goal is not needed for
>>>>>>>> building
>>>>>>>> the site.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published on the
>>> website.
>>>>>>>>> Something similar to the following should build it for you
>>> locally.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1. git checkout rel/1.1.1
>>>>>>>>> 2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate site
>>>>>> assembly:single`
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rajeshkumar J wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1. Some methods of
>>>>> hbase
>>>>>>>>>> 0.94
>>>>>>>>>> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone post me the link
>>> for
>>>>> Api
>>>>>>>>>> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't find that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> busbey
>>>
>>
>>
Re: Hbase 1.1.1 API documentation link
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
Added a 1.2 link too, FYI.
St.Ack
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> Link to 1.1. docs is not up. See under 'Documentation and API' tab. See
> the tail of the menu. Just above the 0.94 item, there is a new 1.1 doc.
>
> St.Ack
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think most folks are looking for javadocs, which vary considerably
>>> across minor release lines.
>>>
>>>
>> Sorry. Yes. Indeed that is what Rajeshkumar asked originally.
>>
>> As penance for my derail of the thread, let me work on putting up a link
>> to 1.1. doc. this evening.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> St.Ack
>>
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> We do have an hbase book for 0.94 specially:
>>> >> http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/book.html, and it might be a good
>>> question
>>> >> that shall we supply similar website of different branches for user or
>>> >> always require them to generate the site by themselves? Current hbase
>>> book
>>> >> (
>>> >> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html) contains some new features only
>>> for 2.0
>>> >> (plz correct me if I'm wrong) so might not be proper for all users to
>>> refer
>>> >> to?
>>> >>
>>> >> btw, if plan to use branch-1.1 release, I'd suggest to use versions
>>> later
>>> >> than (including) 1.1.4 because of HBASE-14460 (
>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14460, which fixes
>>> performance
>>> >> regression), JFYI @Rajeshkumar
>>> >>
>>> >> Best Regards,
>>> >> Yu
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> > This is a perennial (... that we should publish per-version doc.)
>>> >
>>> > Truth be told, we don't do the work to maintain version specific
>>> > documentation. RMs usually copy the current state of the master doc
>>> into
>>> > their branch before cutting an RC so they get the 'latest' changes.
>>> Doc is
>>> > done up on the master branch. Doc will have callouts if a
>>> version-specific
>>> > config or feature but we are probably erratic in our practice here
>>> (and in
>>> > the converse, deprecating the old and no longer supported).
>>> >
>>> > Doc seems to change at a slow rate so maybe its not so bad that this
>>> is the
>>> > case.
>>> >
>>> > That said, if the 1.1 doc has big differences from the master doc., we
>>> > could do the same was we did for 0.94 -- making a subdir for 1.1.
>>> >
>>> > St.Ack
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> On 7 November 2016 at 13:06, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > I actually run the (modified) command in your first email quite
>>> often -
>>> >> > when building tar balls for cluster testing.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > In that case, site goal is not used.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Cheers
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > > In hindsight, you're probably right, Ted. I was just copying from
>>> the
>>> >> > book
>>> >> > > and forgot to remove that execution :)
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > Ted Yu wrote:
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >> If I am not mistaken, the 'assembly:single' goal is not needed
>>> for
>>> >> > >> building
>>> >> > >> the site.
>>> >> > >>
>>> >> > >> Cheers
>>> >> > >>
>>> >> > >> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser<josh.elser@gmail.com
>>> >
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> > >>
>>> >> > >> Hi,
>>> >> > >>>
>>> >> > >>> I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published on the
>>> website.
>>> >> > >>> Something similar to the following should build it for you
>>> locally.
>>> >> > >>>
>>> >> > >>> 1. git checkout rel/1.1.1
>>> >> > >>> 2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate site
>>> >> > assembly:single`
>>> >> > >>>
>>> >> > >>>
>>> >> > >>> Rajeshkumar J wrote:
>>> >> > >>>
>>> >> > >>> Hi,
>>> >> > >>>>
>>> >> > >>>> We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1. Some methods
>>> of
>>> >> hbase
>>> >> > >>>> 0.94
>>> >> > >>>> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone post me the link
>>> for
>>> >> Api
>>> >> > >>>> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't find that.
>>> >> > >>>>
>>> >> > >>>> Thanks
>>> >> > >>>>
>>> >> > >>>>
>>> >> > >>>>
>>> >> > >>
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> busbey
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Hbase 1.1.1 API documentation link
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
Link to 1.1. docs is not up. See under 'Documentation and API' tab. See the
tail of the menu. Just above the 0.94 item, there is a new 1.1 doc.
St.Ack
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> I think most folks are looking for javadocs, which vary considerably
>> across minor release lines.
>>
>>
> Sorry. Yes. Indeed that is what Rajeshkumar asked originally.
>
> As penance for my derail of the thread, let me work on putting up a link
> to 1.1. doc. this evening.
>
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>
>
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> We do have an hbase book for 0.94 specially:
>> >> http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/book.html, and it might be a good
>> question
>> >> that shall we supply similar website of different branches for user or
>> >> always require them to generate the site by themselves? Current hbase
>> book
>> >> (
>> >> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html) contains some new features only
>> for 2.0
>> >> (plz correct me if I'm wrong) so might not be proper for all users to
>> refer
>> >> to?
>> >>
>> >> btw, if plan to use branch-1.1 release, I'd suggest to use versions
>> later
>> >> than (including) 1.1.4 because of HBASE-14460 (
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14460, which fixes
>> performance
>> >> regression), JFYI @Rajeshkumar
>> >>
>> >> Best Regards,
>> >> Yu
>> >>
>> >>
>> > This is a perennial (... that we should publish per-version doc.)
>> >
>> > Truth be told, we don't do the work to maintain version specific
>> > documentation. RMs usually copy the current state of the master doc into
>> > their branch before cutting an RC so they get the 'latest' changes. Doc
>> is
>> > done up on the master branch. Doc will have callouts if a
>> version-specific
>> > config or feature but we are probably erratic in our practice here (and
>> in
>> > the converse, deprecating the old and no longer supported).
>> >
>> > Doc seems to change at a slow rate so maybe its not so bad that this is
>> the
>> > case.
>> >
>> > That said, if the 1.1 doc has big differences from the master doc., we
>> > could do the same was we did for 0.94 -- making a subdir for 1.1.
>> >
>> > St.Ack
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> On 7 November 2016 at 13:06, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I actually run the (modified) command in your first email quite
>> often -
>> >> > when building tar balls for cluster testing.
>> >> >
>> >> > In that case, site goal is not used.
>> >> >
>> >> > Cheers
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > In hindsight, you're probably right, Ted. I was just copying from
>> the
>> >> > book
>> >> > > and forgot to remove that execution :)
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Ted Yu wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> If I am not mistaken, the 'assembly:single' goal is not needed for
>> >> > >> building
>> >> > >> the site.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Cheers
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Hi,
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>> I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published on the
>> website.
>> >> > >>> Something similar to the following should build it for you
>> locally.
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>> 1. git checkout rel/1.1.1
>> >> > >>> 2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate site
>> >> > assembly:single`
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>> Rajeshkumar J wrote:
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>> Hi,
>> >> > >>>>
>> >> > >>>> We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1. Some methods of
>> >> hbase
>> >> > >>>> 0.94
>> >> > >>>> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone post me the link
>> for
>> >> Api
>> >> > >>>> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't find that.
>> >> > >>>>
>> >> > >>>> Thanks
>> >> > >>>>
>> >> > >>>>
>> >> > >>>>
>> >> > >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> busbey
>>
>
>
Re: Hbase 1.1.1 API documentation link
Posted by Phil Yang <ud...@gmail.com>.
For javadoc I think users need accurate api docs for the version they use,
so we may also need api docs for 0.98/1.0/1.2 and coming 1.3?
For "doc", which called HBase Book, I think only one book is good but we
may need to tell users which version does HBase starts to support for each
feature/option it mentions. For example, we may add some important options
in hbase-default.xml when we add new features, and we will update HBase
Book according to the latest hbase-default.xml. But some of them may only
in 2.0 and user may use 1.1/1.2, they may be misled by the book. Add a
"since 2.0.0" tag can help users know if a feature in the book is supported
by the released version they use, and also can encourage users to upgrade
to the new version if the feature is what they want but not included by the
version they use.
Thanks,
Phil
2016-11-08 12:13 GMT+08:00 Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com>:
> Oops, sorry, actually it was me derailing the topic from javadoc to doc...
> And thanks stack for the proposal of setting up 1.1 doc, I think it'll be
> useful (Smile).
>
> However, similar to doc, there's javadoc published for 2.0 and 0.94, but
> none for other version:
> API doc for 0.94: http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/apidocs/
> API doc for 2.0: http://hbase.apache.org/apidocs/
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
> On 8 November 2016 at 08:30, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I think most folks are looking for javadocs, which vary considerably
> > > across minor release lines.
> > >
> > >
> > Sorry. Yes. Indeed that is what Rajeshkumar asked originally.
> >
> > As penance for my derail of the thread, let me work on putting up a link
> to
> > 1.1. doc. this evening.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> We do have an hbase book for 0.94 specially:
> > > >> http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/book.html, and it might be a good
> > question
> > > >> that shall we supply similar website of different branches for user
> or
> > > >> always require them to generate the site by themselves? Current
> hbase
> > > book
> > > >> (
> > > >> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html) contains some new features only
> > for
> > > 2.0
> > > >> (plz correct me if I'm wrong) so might not be proper for all users
> to
> > > refer
> > > >> to?
> > > >>
> > > >> btw, if plan to use branch-1.1 release, I'd suggest to use versions
> > > later
> > > >> than (including) 1.1.4 because of HBASE-14460 (
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14460, which fixes
> > > performance
> > > >> regression), JFYI @Rajeshkumar
> > > >>
> > > >> Best Regards,
> > > >> Yu
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > > This is a perennial (... that we should publish per-version doc.)
> > > >
> > > > Truth be told, we don't do the work to maintain version specific
> > > > documentation. RMs usually copy the current state of the master doc
> > into
> > > > their branch before cutting an RC so they get the 'latest' changes.
> Doc
> > > is
> > > > done up on the master branch. Doc will have callouts if a
> > > version-specific
> > > > config or feature but we are probably erratic in our practice here
> (and
> > > in
> > > > the converse, deprecating the old and no longer supported).
> > > >
> > > > Doc seems to change at a slow rate so maybe its not so bad that this
> is
> > > the
> > > > case.
> > > >
> > > > That said, if the 1.1 doc has big differences from the master doc.,
> we
> > > > could do the same was we did for 0.94 -- making a subdir for 1.1.
> > > >
> > > > St.Ack
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> On 7 November 2016 at 13:06, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > I actually run the (modified) command in your first email quite
> > often
> > > -
> > > >> > when building tar balls for cluster testing.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > In that case, site goal is not used.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Cheers
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > In hindsight, you're probably right, Ted. I was just copying
> from
> > > the
> > > >> > book
> > > >> > > and forgot to remove that execution :)
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Ted Yu wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> If I am not mistaken, the 'assembly:single' goal is not needed
> > for
> > > >> > >> building
> > > >> > >> the site.
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> Cheers
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser<
> josh.elser@gmail.com
> > >
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> Hi,
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published on the
> > > website.
> > > >> > >>> Something similar to the following should build it for you
> > > locally.
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> 1. git checkout rel/1.1.1
> > > >> > >>> 2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate site
> > > >> > assembly:single`
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> Rajeshkumar J wrote:
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> Hi,
> > > >> > >>>>
> > > >> > >>>> We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1. Some methods
> > of
> > > >> hbase
> > > >> > >>>> 0.94
> > > >> > >>>> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone post me the
> link
> > > for
> > > >> Api
> > > >> > >>>> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't find that.
> > > >> > >>>>
> > > >> > >>>> Thanks
> > > >> > >>>>
> > > >> > >>>>
> > > >> > >>>>
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > busbey
> > >
> >
>
Re: Hbase 1.1.1 API documentation link
Posted by Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com>.
Oops, sorry, actually it was me derailing the topic from javadoc to doc...
And thanks stack for the proposal of setting up 1.1 doc, I think it'll be
useful (Smile).
However, similar to doc, there's javadoc published for 2.0 and 0.94, but
none for other version:
API doc for 0.94: http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/apidocs/
API doc for 2.0: http://hbase.apache.org/apidocs/
Best Regards,
Yu
On 8 November 2016 at 08:30, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > I think most folks are looking for javadocs, which vary considerably
> > across minor release lines.
> >
> >
> Sorry. Yes. Indeed that is what Rajeshkumar asked originally.
>
> As penance for my derail of the thread, let me work on putting up a link to
> 1.1. doc. this evening.
>
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>
>
> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> We do have an hbase book for 0.94 specially:
> > >> http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/book.html, and it might be a good
> question
> > >> that shall we supply similar website of different branches for user or
> > >> always require them to generate the site by themselves? Current hbase
> > book
> > >> (
> > >> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html) contains some new features only
> for
> > 2.0
> > >> (plz correct me if I'm wrong) so might not be proper for all users to
> > refer
> > >> to?
> > >>
> > >> btw, if plan to use branch-1.1 release, I'd suggest to use versions
> > later
> > >> than (including) 1.1.4 because of HBASE-14460 (
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14460, which fixes
> > performance
> > >> regression), JFYI @Rajeshkumar
> > >>
> > >> Best Regards,
> > >> Yu
> > >>
> > >>
> > > This is a perennial (... that we should publish per-version doc.)
> > >
> > > Truth be told, we don't do the work to maintain version specific
> > > documentation. RMs usually copy the current state of the master doc
> into
> > > their branch before cutting an RC so they get the 'latest' changes. Doc
> > is
> > > done up on the master branch. Doc will have callouts if a
> > version-specific
> > > config or feature but we are probably erratic in our practice here (and
> > in
> > > the converse, deprecating the old and no longer supported).
> > >
> > > Doc seems to change at a slow rate so maybe its not so bad that this is
> > the
> > > case.
> > >
> > > That said, if the 1.1 doc has big differences from the master doc., we
> > > could do the same was we did for 0.94 -- making a subdir for 1.1.
> > >
> > > St.Ack
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> On 7 November 2016 at 13:06, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I actually run the (modified) command in your first email quite
> often
> > -
> > >> > when building tar balls for cluster testing.
> > >> >
> > >> > In that case, site goal is not used.
> > >> >
> > >> > Cheers
> > >> >
> > >> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > In hindsight, you're probably right, Ted. I was just copying from
> > the
> > >> > book
> > >> > > and forgot to remove that execution :)
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Ted Yu wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> If I am not mistaken, the 'assembly:single' goal is not needed
> for
> > >> > >> building
> > >> > >> the site.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Cheers
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser<josh.elser@gmail.com
> >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Hi,
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published on the
> > website.
> > >> > >>> Something similar to the following should build it for you
> > locally.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> 1. git checkout rel/1.1.1
> > >> > >>> 2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate site
> > >> > assembly:single`
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> Rajeshkumar J wrote:
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> Hi,
> > >> > >>>>
> > >> > >>>> We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1. Some methods
> of
> > >> hbase
> > >> > >>>> 0.94
> > >> > >>>> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone post me the link
> > for
> > >> Api
> > >> > >>>> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't find that.
> > >> > >>>>
> > >> > >>>> Thanks
> > >> > >>>>
> > >> > >>>>
> > >> > >>>>
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > busbey
> >
>
Re: Hbase 1.1.1 API documentation link
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> I think most folks are looking for javadocs, which vary considerably
> across minor release lines.
>
>
Sorry. Yes. Indeed that is what Rajeshkumar asked originally.
As penance for my derail of the thread, let me work on putting up a link to
1.1. doc. this evening.
Thanks,
St.Ack
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> We do have an hbase book for 0.94 specially:
> >> http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/book.html, and it might be a good question
> >> that shall we supply similar website of different branches for user or
> >> always require them to generate the site by themselves? Current hbase
> book
> >> (
> >> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html) contains some new features only for
> 2.0
> >> (plz correct me if I'm wrong) so might not be proper for all users to
> refer
> >> to?
> >>
> >> btw, if plan to use branch-1.1 release, I'd suggest to use versions
> later
> >> than (including) 1.1.4 because of HBASE-14460 (
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14460, which fixes
> performance
> >> regression), JFYI @Rajeshkumar
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Yu
> >>
> >>
> > This is a perennial (... that we should publish per-version doc.)
> >
> > Truth be told, we don't do the work to maintain version specific
> > documentation. RMs usually copy the current state of the master doc into
> > their branch before cutting an RC so they get the 'latest' changes. Doc
> is
> > done up on the master branch. Doc will have callouts if a
> version-specific
> > config or feature but we are probably erratic in our practice here (and
> in
> > the converse, deprecating the old and no longer supported).
> >
> > Doc seems to change at a slow rate so maybe its not so bad that this is
> the
> > case.
> >
> > That said, if the 1.1 doc has big differences from the master doc., we
> > could do the same was we did for 0.94 -- making a subdir for 1.1.
> >
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 7 November 2016 at 13:06, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I actually run the (modified) command in your first email quite often
> -
> >> > when building tar balls for cluster testing.
> >> >
> >> > In that case, site goal is not used.
> >> >
> >> > Cheers
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > In hindsight, you're probably right, Ted. I was just copying from
> the
> >> > book
> >> > > and forgot to remove that execution :)
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Ted Yu wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> If I am not mistaken, the 'assembly:single' goal is not needed for
> >> > >> building
> >> > >> the site.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Cheers
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Hi,
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published on the
> website.
> >> > >>> Something similar to the following should build it for you
> locally.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> 1. git checkout rel/1.1.1
> >> > >>> 2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate site
> >> > assembly:single`
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Rajeshkumar J wrote:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Hi,
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1. Some methods of
> >> hbase
> >> > >>>> 0.94
> >> > >>>> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone post me the link
> for
> >> Api
> >> > >>>> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't find that.
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> Thanks
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> busbey
>
Re: Hbase 1.1.1 API documentation link
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>.
I think most folks are looking for javadocs, which vary considerably
across minor release lines.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> We do have an hbase book for 0.94 specially:
>> http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/book.html, and it might be a good question
>> that shall we supply similar website of different branches for user or
>> always require them to generate the site by themselves? Current hbase book
>> (
>> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html) contains some new features only for 2.0
>> (plz correct me if I'm wrong) so might not be proper for all users to refer
>> to?
>>
>> btw, if plan to use branch-1.1 release, I'd suggest to use versions later
>> than (including) 1.1.4 because of HBASE-14460 (
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14460, which fixes performance
>> regression), JFYI @Rajeshkumar
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Yu
>>
>>
> This is a perennial (... that we should publish per-version doc.)
>
> Truth be told, we don't do the work to maintain version specific
> documentation. RMs usually copy the current state of the master doc into
> their branch before cutting an RC so they get the 'latest' changes. Doc is
> done up on the master branch. Doc will have callouts if a version-specific
> config or feature but we are probably erratic in our practice here (and in
> the converse, deprecating the old and no longer supported).
>
> Doc seems to change at a slow rate so maybe its not so bad that this is the
> case.
>
> That said, if the 1.1 doc has big differences from the master doc., we
> could do the same was we did for 0.94 -- making a subdir for 1.1.
>
> St.Ack
>
>
>
>
>> On 7 November 2016 at 13:06, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I actually run the (modified) command in your first email quite often -
>> > when building tar balls for cluster testing.
>> >
>> > In that case, site goal is not used.
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> >
>> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > In hindsight, you're probably right, Ted. I was just copying from the
>> > book
>> > > and forgot to remove that execution :)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Ted Yu wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> If I am not mistaken, the 'assembly:single' goal is not needed for
>> > >> building
>> > >> the site.
>> > >>
>> > >> Cheers
>> > >>
>> > >> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Hi,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published on the website.
>> > >>> Something similar to the following should build it for you locally.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> 1. git checkout rel/1.1.1
>> > >>> 2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate site
>> > assembly:single`
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Rajeshkumar J wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Hi,
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1. Some methods of
>> hbase
>> > >>>> 0.94
>> > >>>> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone post me the link for
>> Api
>> > >>>> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't find that.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Thanks
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
--
busbey
Re: Hbase 1.1.1 API documentation link
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We do have an hbase book for 0.94 specially:
> http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/book.html, and it might be a good question
> that shall we supply similar website of different branches for user or
> always require them to generate the site by themselves? Current hbase book
> (
> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html) contains some new features only for 2.0
> (plz correct me if I'm wrong) so might not be proper for all users to refer
> to?
>
> btw, if plan to use branch-1.1 release, I'd suggest to use versions later
> than (including) 1.1.4 because of HBASE-14460 (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14460, which fixes performance
> regression), JFYI @Rajeshkumar
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
>
This is a perennial (... that we should publish per-version doc.)
Truth be told, we don't do the work to maintain version specific
documentation. RMs usually copy the current state of the master doc into
their branch before cutting an RC so they get the 'latest' changes. Doc is
done up on the master branch. Doc will have callouts if a version-specific
config or feature but we are probably erratic in our practice here (and in
the converse, deprecating the old and no longer supported).
Doc seems to change at a slow rate so maybe its not so bad that this is the
case.
That said, if the 1.1 doc has big differences from the master doc., we
could do the same was we did for 0.94 -- making a subdir for 1.1.
St.Ack
> On 7 November 2016 at 13:06, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I actually run the (modified) command in your first email quite often -
> > when building tar balls for cluster testing.
> >
> > In that case, site goal is not used.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In hindsight, you're probably right, Ted. I was just copying from the
> > book
> > > and forgot to remove that execution :)
> > >
> > >
> > > Ted Yu wrote:
> > >
> > >> If I am not mistaken, the 'assembly:single' goal is not needed for
> > >> building
> > >> the site.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published on the website.
> > >>> Something similar to the following should build it for you locally.
> > >>>
> > >>> 1. git checkout rel/1.1.1
> > >>> 2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate site
> > assembly:single`
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Rajeshkumar J wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1. Some methods of
> hbase
> > >>>> 0.94
> > >>>> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone post me the link for
> Api
> > >>>> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't find that.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> >
>
Re: Hbase 1.1.1 API documentation link
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
For branch-1.1, since there would be more releases in the foreseeable future, it makes sense to publish its own site.
> On Nov 6, 2016, at 9:23 PM, Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We do have an hbase book for 0.94 specially:
> http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/book.html, and it might be a good question
> that shall we supply similar website of different branches for user or
> always require them to generate the site by themselves? Current hbase book (
> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html) contains some new features only for 2.0
> (plz correct me if I'm wrong) so might not be proper for all users to refer
> to?
>
> btw, if plan to use branch-1.1 release, I'd suggest to use versions later
> than (including) 1.1.4 because of HBASE-14460 (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14460, which fixes performance
> regression), JFYI @Rajeshkumar
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
>> On 7 November 2016 at 13:06, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I actually run the (modified) command in your first email quite often -
>> when building tar balls for cluster testing.
>>
>> In that case, site goal is not used.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> In hindsight, you're probably right, Ted. I was just copying from the
>> book
>>> and forgot to remove that execution :)
>>>
>>>
>>> Ted Yu wrote:
>>>
>>>> If I am not mistaken, the 'assembly:single' goal is not needed for
>>>> building
>>>> the site.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published on the website.
>>>>> Something similar to the following should build it for you locally.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. git checkout rel/1.1.1
>>>>> 2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate site
>> assembly:single`
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rajeshkumar J wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1. Some methods of hbase
>>>>>> 0.94
>>>>>> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone post me the link for Api
>>>>>> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't find that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>
Re: Hbase 1.1.1 API documentation link
Posted by Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com>.
We do have an hbase book for 0.94 specially:
http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/book.html, and it might be a good question
that shall we supply similar website of different branches for user or
always require them to generate the site by themselves? Current hbase book (
http://hbase.apache.org/book.html) contains some new features only for 2.0
(plz correct me if I'm wrong) so might not be proper for all users to refer
to?
btw, if plan to use branch-1.1 release, I'd suggest to use versions later
than (including) 1.1.4 because of HBASE-14460 (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14460, which fixes performance
regression), JFYI @Rajeshkumar
Best Regards,
Yu
On 7 November 2016 at 13:06, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I actually run the (modified) command in your first email quite often -
> when building tar balls for cluster testing.
>
> In that case, site goal is not used.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > In hindsight, you're probably right, Ted. I was just copying from the
> book
> > and forgot to remove that execution :)
> >
> >
> > Ted Yu wrote:
> >
> >> If I am not mistaken, the 'assembly:single' goal is not needed for
> >> building
> >> the site.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published on the website.
> >>> Something similar to the following should build it for you locally.
> >>>
> >>> 1. git checkout rel/1.1.1
> >>> 2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate site
> assembly:single`
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Rajeshkumar J wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1. Some methods of hbase
> >>>> 0.94
> >>>> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone post me the link for Api
> >>>> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't find that.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
>
Re: Hbase 1.1.1 API documentation link
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
I actually run the (modified) command in your first email quite often -
when building tar balls for cluster testing.
In that case, site goal is not used.
Cheers
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In hindsight, you're probably right, Ted. I was just copying from the book
> and forgot to remove that execution :)
>
>
> Ted Yu wrote:
>
>> If I am not mistaken, the 'assembly:single' goal is not needed for
>> building
>> the site.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published on the website.
>>> Something similar to the following should build it for you locally.
>>>
>>> 1. git checkout rel/1.1.1
>>> 2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate site assembly:single`
>>>
>>>
>>> Rajeshkumar J wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1. Some methods of hbase
>>>> 0.94
>>>> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone post me the link for Api
>>>> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't find that.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
Re: Hbase 1.1.1 API documentation link
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
In hindsight, you're probably right, Ted. I was just copying from the
book and forgot to remove that execution :)
Ted Yu wrote:
> If I am not mistaken, the 'assembly:single' goal is not needed for building
> the site.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published on the website.
>> Something similar to the following should build it for you locally.
>>
>> 1. git checkout rel/1.1.1
>> 2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate site assembly:single`
>>
>>
>> Rajeshkumar J wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1. Some methods of hbase 0.94
>>> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone post me the link for Api
>>> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't find that.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>
Re: Hbase 1.1.1 API documentation link
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
If I am not mistaken, the 'assembly:single' goal is not needed for building
the site.
Cheers
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published on the website.
> Something similar to the following should build it for you locally.
>
> 1. git checkout rel/1.1.1
> 2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate site assembly:single`
>
>
> Rajeshkumar J wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1. Some methods of hbase 0.94
>> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone post me the link for Api
>> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't find that.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
Re: Hbase 1.1.1 API documentation link
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published on the website.
Something similar to the following should build it for you locally.
1. git checkout rel/1.1.1
2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate site assembly:single`
Rajeshkumar J wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1. Some methods of hbase 0.94
> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone post me the link for Api
> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't find that.
>
> Thanks
>