Quetsion about different WS-Resource Referenz Embodiments

[Michael Marks <mi...@gmx.de>]

Hi all together, 

I have read the new draft of the WS-Resource Spezifikation 
(wsrf-WS-Resource-1.2-draft-03.pdf at OASIS TC). 
There is a section wich defines different kinds of WS-Resource Access
Pattern Embodiments. 

There are two dynamic Embodiments for WS-Resource References defined: 

one based on WS-MessageDelivery and 
another using WS-Addressing Endpoint References. 

I wonder, why there was defined a new Embodiment based on
WS-MessageDelivery while a dynamic embodiment using WS-Addressing EPR
already existed.

Are there advantages by using the WS-Resource Reference based on
WS-MessageDelivery against the using of WSA-EPR s?

I know, that's no question concerning the implemention of Apollo, but I
thougt this will be the right place to ask, because you are working
against the WSRF Specs while implementing the Apollo Framework. 

Thanks in advance!

Michael


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: apollo-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: apollo-dev-help@ws.apache.org