[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6917) Move NumericField out of core to backwards-codecs

["David Smiley (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15044095#comment-15044095 ] 

David Smiley commented on LUCENE-6917:
--------------------------------------

+1 I was looking forward to this :-)

Can you please link to the benchmarks you did?

And I'm curious why some uses, say BBoxStrategy to pick one example, still use the Legacy version; why not the latest and greatest BKD?  If it's *just* for precisionStep -- by all means just toss the precisionStep configuration.  It won't apply any more.

> Move NumericField out of core to backwards-codecs
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-6917
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6917
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: 6.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-6917.patch
>
>
> DimensionalValues seems to be better across the board (indexing time, indexing size, search-speed, search-time heap required) than NumericField, at least in my testing so far.
> I think for 6.0 we should move {{IntField}}, {{LongField}}, {{FloatField}}, {{DoubleField}} and {{NumericRangeQuery}} to {{backward-codecs}}, and rename with {{Legacy}} prefix?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org