You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mina.apache.org by Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr> on 2009/10/20 11:22:20 UTC
[3.0] core package organization
Hi,
For 3.0 I'm thinking about using org.apache.mina for API classes (mainly
interfaces) in place of org.apache.mina.core.
All the o.a.mina classes/interface will be exported for mina-core OSGi
bundle.
WDYT ?
Julien
Re: [3.0] core package organization
Posted by Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr>.
Le Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:52:17 +0200,
Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org> a écrit :
> Julien Vermillard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > For 3.0 I'm thinking about using org.apache.mina for API classes
> > (mainly interfaces) in place of org.apache.mina.core.
> >
> Sounds good to me.
>
> I would like to get the filters out of the main package too, as a
> separated project.
> Not sure it's a wise idea though, as we may want to have one single
> jar. To be discussed...
>
We still can generated all the core + filter package in a single
MINA jar.
>
> > All the o.a.mina classes/interface will be exported for mina-core
> > OSGi bundle.
> >
> +1
> > WDYT ?
> >
> > Julien
> >
>
>
Re: [3.0] core package organization
Posted by Ashish <pa...@gmail.com>.
--
thanks
ashish
Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
Re: [3.0] core package organization
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org>.
Julien Vermillard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For 3.0 I'm thinking about using org.apache.mina for API classes (mainly
> interfaces) in place of org.apache.mina.core.
>
Sounds good to me.
I would like to get the filters out of the main package too, as a
separated project.
Not sure it's a wise idea though, as we may want to have one single jar.
To be discussed...
> All the o.a.mina classes/interface will be exported for mina-core OSGi
> bundle.
>
+1
> WDYT ?
>
> Julien
>
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org