Re: [important] 1.5 in core

[Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>]

> There is a call to StringBuffer.insert(int, ILjava/lang/CharSequence;) in JspStateManagerImpl.getPathToComponent .  This insert() method was introduced in java 1.5 .  Continuum and our compilers have ignored this for months and probably just coerced the second arg into Object.
>
> Are the binaries in the new MyFaces repo being built with the same compiler options as the nightly build process?

Yes the same machine (our zone) but its a 1.5 JDK.

> This is holding up the release because of a method not found error.  I am running low on time right now so I would appreciate it if others can look into this also.

Which package?  Shared or core?  I agree, this should be fixed ASAP. 
I will try to find time tomorrow but its better if someone else fix
first so I can use my time to rebuild the release candidate.

> Dennis Byrne

Sean

Re: [important] 1.5 in core

[Paul Spencer <pa...@mindspring.com>]

What is the address of the "myfaces repo"?

I do not see a version, or snapshot, dated today in 
http://cvs.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/myfaces/core/.


Paul Spencer



Sean Schofield wrote:
> FYI I put a new RC up on the myfaces repo.  TCK testing should begin
> shortly.  Lets get this released by the end of the week!
> 
> Sean
> 
> On 5/1/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Yes we should install JDK 1.4 on the zone which is used for nightly
>> builds and release candidates.  I think that is the best long term
>> solution.
>>
>> Sean
>>
>> On 5/1/06, Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at> wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> > >> This is holding up the release because of a method not found error.
>> > >> I am running low on time right now so I would appreciate it if 
>> others
>> > >> can look into this also.
>> > >
>> > > Which package?  Shared or core?  I agree, this should be fixed 
>> ASAP. I
>> > > will try to find time tomorrow but its better if someone else fix
>> > > first so I can use my time to rebuild the release candidate.
>> > I guess I fixed it, though, not testet but it should do its job.
>> >
>> > It looks like I become the "last bug before release" fixer ;-)
>> >
>> > However, the best will be to use a 1.4 JDK to build the release - or at
>> > least use the JDK 1.4 libraries (this will be possible by adding 
>> them to
>> > the bootclasspath I think - I've never done it myself, there are
>> > documentations how to do in internet), that way such incompatibilites
>> > will come up early.
>> >
>> > Ciao,
>> > Mario
>> >
>> >
>>
> 

Re: [important] 1.5 in core

[Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>]

> What is the address of the "myfaces repo"?

http://myfaces.zones.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/

Re: [important] 1.5 in core

[Paul Spencer <pa...@apache.org>]

What is the address of the "myfaces repo"?

What is the version number in the repo"?

I do not see a version, or snapshot, dated today in
http://cvs.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/myfaces/core/.


Paul Spencer



Sean Schofield wrote:
> FYI I put a new RC up on the myfaces repo.  TCK testing should begin
> shortly.  Lets get this released by the end of the week!
> 
> Sean
> 
> On 5/1/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Yes we should install JDK 1.4 on the zone which is used for nightly
>> builds and release candidates.  I think that is the best long term
>> solution.
>>
>> Sean
>>
>> On 5/1/06, Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at> wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> > >> This is holding up the release because of a method not found error.
>> > >> I am running low on time right now so I would appreciate it if 
>> others
>> > >> can look into this also.
>> > >
>> > > Which package?  Shared or core?  I agree, this should be fixed 
>> ASAP. I
>> > > will try to find time tomorrow but its better if someone else fix
>> > > first so I can use my time to rebuild the release candidate.
>> > I guess I fixed it, though, not testet but it should do its job.
>> >
>> > It looks like I become the "last bug before release" fixer ;-)
>> >
>> > However, the best will be to use a 1.4 JDK to build the release - or at
>> > least use the JDK 1.4 libraries (this will be possible by adding 
>> them to
>> > the bootclasspath I think - I've never done it myself, there are
>> > documentations how to do in internet), that way such incompatibilites
>> > will come up early.
>> >
>> > Ciao,
>> > Mario
>> >
>> >
>>
> 

Re: [important] 1.5 in core

[Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>]

FYI I put a new RC up on the myfaces repo.  TCK testing should begin
shortly.  Lets get this released by the end of the week!

Sean

On 5/1/06, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes we should install JDK 1.4 on the zone which is used for nightly
> builds and release candidates.  I think that is the best long term
> solution.
>
> Sean
>
> On 5/1/06, Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at> wrote:
> > Hi!
> > >> This is holding up the release because of a method not found error.
> > >> I am running low on time right now so I would appreciate it if others
> > >> can look into this also.
> > >
> > > Which package?  Shared or core?  I agree, this should be fixed ASAP. I
> > > will try to find time tomorrow but its better if someone else fix
> > > first so I can use my time to rebuild the release candidate.
> > I guess I fixed it, though, not testet but it should do its job.
> >
> > It looks like I become the "last bug before release" fixer ;-)
> >
> > However, the best will be to use a 1.4 JDK to build the release - or at
> > least use the JDK 1.4 libraries (this will be possible by adding them to
> > the bootclasspath I think - I've never done it myself, there are
> > documentations how to do in internet), that way such incompatibilites
> > will come up early.
> >
> > Ciao,
> > Mario
> >
> >
>

Re: [important] 1.5 in core

[Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>]

Yes we should install JDK 1.4 on the zone which is used for nightly
builds and release candidates.  I think that is the best long term
solution.

Sean

On 5/1/06, Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at> wrote:
> Hi!
> >> This is holding up the release because of a method not found error.
> >> I am running low on time right now so I would appreciate it if others
> >> can look into this also.
> >
> > Which package?  Shared or core?  I agree, this should be fixed ASAP. I
> > will try to find time tomorrow but its better if someone else fix
> > first so I can use my time to rebuild the release candidate.
> I guess I fixed it, though, not testet but it should do its job.
>
> It looks like I become the "last bug before release" fixer ;-)
>
> However, the best will be to use a 1.4 JDK to build the release - or at
> least use the JDK 1.4 libraries (this will be possible by adding them to
> the bootclasspath I think - I've never done it myself, there are
> documentations how to do in internet), that way such incompatibilites
> will come up early.
>
> Ciao,
> Mario
>
>

Re: [important] 1.5 in core

[Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at>]

Hi!
>> This is holding up the release because of a method not found error. 
>> I am running low on time right now so I would appreciate it if others
>> can look into this also.
>
> Which package?  Shared or core?  I agree, this should be fixed ASAP. I
> will try to find time tomorrow but its better if someone else fix
> first so I can use my time to rebuild the release candidate.
I guess I fixed it, though, not testet but it should do its job.

It looks like I become the "last bug before release" fixer ;-)

However, the best will be to use a 1.4 JDK to build the release - or at
least use the JDK 1.4 libraries (this will be possible by adding them to
the bootclasspath I think - I've never done it myself, there are
documentations how to do in internet), that way such incompatibilites
will come up early.

Ciao,
Mario