You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-dev@logging.apache.org by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> on 2013/01/01 20:36:29 UTC
Next Log4j 2.0 release
I took me longer than I wanted but I have finally fixed all the issues I wanted to complete before doing the 2.0-beta4 release. Please let me know if you are aware of something else that needs to be done before the release.
A larger question is whether the subsequent release should be beta5 or whether we are good to go with the 2.0 GA release.
Thoughts?
Ralph
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
Re: Next Log4j 2.0 release
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
A new beta feels about right too...
Gary
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>wrote:
> Infra has closed this so I expect we should be able to start moving
> current distributions to the new location.
>
> Ralph
>
> On Jan 12, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> FYI - I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5750
>
> Ralph
>
> On Jan 8, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Ralph Goers <rg...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Yes, release dist too. See
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#upload-ci.
>
>
> I am definitely shocked right now. I always understood websites. I
> knew /dist is possible but didnt see it as a requirement.
>
> going to look at the process the next days, thanks for telling
>
> Ralph
>
>
> On Jan 8, 2013, at 10:53 AM, Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>
>
> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Ralph Goers <rg...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> I would like to test the bug Joern found with serialization, but that may
>
>
> not be critical to fix. Other than email I generally don't work on ASF
>
>
> stuff much during $work hours, so I will need to find some time. Also, the
>
>
> logging project hasn't converted the distribution site to svnpubsub as
> infra
>
>
> said needed to happen by the end of the year, so I may run into problems
>
>
> with completing the release.
>
>
>
> wait second, release dist too? I thought it was only about websites...
>
>
> For all who don't know what it is about:
>
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#upload-scp
>
>
> Ralph
>
>
>
> On Jan 8, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Scott Severtson <
> ssevertson@digitalmeasures.com>
>
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Where do we stand on the 2.0-beta4 release? We're getting ready to roll out
>
>
> Log4J2 to some of our test servers, and I'd like to use an "official"
>
>
> release, rather than my own compile of trunk. We've observed no issues with
>
>
> our relatively recent trunk build.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> --Scott
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
>
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> I took me longer than I wanted but I have finally fixed all the issues I
>
>
> wanted to complete before doing the 2.0-beta4 release. Please let me know
>
>
> if you are aware of something else that needs to be done before the
> release.
>
>
>
> A larger question is whether the subsequent release should be beta5 or
>
>
> whether we are good to go with the 2.0 GA release.
>
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
> Ralph
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>
>
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.grobmeier.de
>
> https://www.timeandbill.de
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.grobmeier.de
> https://www.timeandbill.de
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
>
>
>
--
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0
Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Re: Next Log4j 2.0 release
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
Infra has closed this so I expect we should be able to start moving current distributions to the new location.
Ralph
On Jan 12, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> FYI - I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5750
>
> Ralph
>
> On Jan 8, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Ralph Goers <rg...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Yes, release dist too. See http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#upload-ci.
>>
>> I am definitely shocked right now. I always understood websites. I
>> knew /dist is possible but didnt see it as a requirement.
>>
>> going to look at the process the next days, thanks for telling
>>
>>> Ralph
>>>
>>> On Jan 8, 2013, at 10:53 AM, Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Ralph Goers <rg...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> I would like to test the bug Joern found with serialization, but that may
>>>
>>> not be critical to fix. Other than email I generally don't work on ASF
>>>
>>> stuff much during $work hours, so I will need to find some time. Also, the
>>>
>>> logging project hasn't converted the distribution site to svnpubsub as infra
>>>
>>> said needed to happen by the end of the year, so I may run into problems
>>>
>>> with completing the release.
>>>
>>>
>>> wait second, release dist too? I thought it was only about websites...
>>>
>>> For all who don't know what it is about:
>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#upload-scp
>>>
>>> Ralph
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 8, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Scott Severtson <ss...@digitalmeasures.com>
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Where do we stand on the 2.0-beta4 release? We're getting ready to roll out
>>>
>>> Log4J2 to some of our test servers, and I'd like to use an "official"
>>>
>>> release, rather than my own compile of trunk. We've observed no issues with
>>>
>>> our relatively recent trunk build.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> --Scott
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I took me longer than I wanted but I have finally fixed all the issues I
>>>
>>> wanted to complete before doing the 2.0-beta4 release. Please let me know
>>>
>>> if you are aware of something else that needs to be done before the release.
>>>
>>>
>>> A larger question is whether the subsequent release should be beta5 or
>>>
>>> whether we are good to go with the 2.0 GA release.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>>> Ralph
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>>>
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>>> https://www.timeandbill.de
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>> https://www.timeandbill.de
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>>
>
Re: Next Log4j 2.0 release
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
FYI - I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5750
Ralph
On Jan 8, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Ralph Goers <rg...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Yes, release dist too. See http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#upload-ci.
>
> I am definitely shocked right now. I always understood websites. I
> knew /dist is possible but didnt see it as a requirement.
>
> going to look at the process the next days, thanks for telling
>
>> Ralph
>>
>> On Jan 8, 2013, at 10:53 AM, Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Ralph Goers <rg...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> I would like to test the bug Joern found with serialization, but that may
>>
>> not be critical to fix. Other than email I generally don't work on ASF
>>
>> stuff much during $work hours, so I will need to find some time. Also, the
>>
>> logging project hasn't converted the distribution site to svnpubsub as infra
>>
>> said needed to happen by the end of the year, so I may run into problems
>>
>> with completing the release.
>>
>>
>> wait second, release dist too? I thought it was only about websites...
>>
>> For all who don't know what it is about:
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#upload-scp
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>>
>> On Jan 8, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Scott Severtson <ss...@digitalmeasures.com>
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Where do we stand on the 2.0-beta4 release? We're getting ready to roll out
>>
>> Log4J2 to some of our test servers, and I'd like to use an "official"
>>
>> release, rather than my own compile of trunk. We've observed no issues with
>>
>> our relatively recent trunk build.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --Scott
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I took me longer than I wanted but I have finally fixed all the issues I
>>
>> wanted to complete before doing the 2.0-beta4 release. Please let me know
>>
>> if you are aware of something else that needs to be done before the release.
>>
>>
>> A larger question is whether the subsequent release should be beta5 or
>>
>> whether we are good to go with the 2.0 GA release.
>>
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>> https://www.timeandbill.de
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.grobmeier.de
> https://www.timeandbill.de
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
Re: Next Log4j 2.0 release
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
Do a google on
Apache svnpubsub releases
and you should see a bunch of links from projects related to this. The clearest is probably the first one from Sebb - http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jmeter-dev/201202.mbox/%3CCAOGo0VZLaZHR1sCbOOCF2niuHQjBdhGx1VxJEsWhrsEbnZrLOQ@mail.gmail.com%3E
Ralph
On Jan 8, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Ralph Goers <rg...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Yes, release dist too. See http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#upload-ci.
>
> I am definitely shocked right now. I always understood websites. I
> knew /dist is possible but didnt see it as a requirement.
>
> going to look at the process the next days, thanks for telling
>
>> Ralph
>>
>> On Jan 8, 2013, at 10:53 AM, Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Ralph Goers <rg...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> I would like to test the bug Joern found with serialization, but that may
>>
>> not be critical to fix. Other than email I generally don't work on ASF
>>
>> stuff much during $work hours, so I will need to find some time. Also, the
>>
>> logging project hasn't converted the distribution site to svnpubsub as infra
>>
>> said needed to happen by the end of the year, so I may run into problems
>>
>> with completing the release.
>>
>>
>> wait second, release dist too? I thought it was only about websites...
>>
>> For all who don't know what it is about:
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#upload-scp
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>>
>> On Jan 8, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Scott Severtson <ss...@digitalmeasures.com>
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Where do we stand on the 2.0-beta4 release? We're getting ready to roll out
>>
>> Log4J2 to some of our test servers, and I'd like to use an "official"
>>
>> release, rather than my own compile of trunk. We've observed no issues with
>>
>> our relatively recent trunk build.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --Scott
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I took me longer than I wanted but I have finally fixed all the issues I
>>
>> wanted to complete before doing the 2.0-beta4 release. Please let me know
>>
>> if you are aware of something else that needs to be done before the release.
>>
>>
>> A larger question is whether the subsequent release should be beta5 or
>>
>> whether we are good to go with the 2.0 GA release.
>>
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>> https://www.timeandbill.de
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.grobmeier.de
> https://www.timeandbill.de
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
Re: Next Log4j 2.0 release
Posted by Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Ralph Goers <rg...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yes, release dist too. See http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#upload-ci.
I am definitely shocked right now. I always understood websites. I
knew /dist is possible but didnt see it as a requirement.
going to look at the process the next days, thanks for telling
> Ralph
>
> On Jan 8, 2013, at 10:53 AM, Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Ralph Goers <rg...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I would like to test the bug Joern found with serialization, but that may
>
> not be critical to fix. Other than email I generally don't work on ASF
>
> stuff much during $work hours, so I will need to find some time. Also, the
>
> logging project hasn't converted the distribution site to svnpubsub as infra
>
> said needed to happen by the end of the year, so I may run into problems
>
> with completing the release.
>
>
> wait second, release dist too? I thought it was only about websites...
>
> For all who don't know what it is about:
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#upload-scp
>
> Ralph
>
>
> On Jan 8, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Scott Severtson <ss...@digitalmeasures.com>
>
> wrote:
>
>
> Where do we stand on the 2.0-beta4 release? We're getting ready to roll out
>
> Log4J2 to some of our test servers, and I'd like to use an "official"
>
> release, rather than my own compile of trunk. We've observed no issues with
>
> our relatively recent trunk build.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> --Scott
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
>
> wrote:
>
>
> I took me longer than I wanted but I have finally fixed all the issues I
>
> wanted to complete before doing the 2.0-beta4 release. Please let me know
>
> if you are aware of something else that needs to be done before the release.
>
>
> A larger question is whether the subsequent release should be beta5 or
>
> whether we are good to go with the 2.0 GA release.
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> Ralph
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.grobmeier.de
> https://www.timeandbill.de
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
Re: Next Log4j 2.0 release
Posted by Ralph Goers <rg...@apache.org>.
Yes, release dist too. See http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#upload-ci.
Ralph
On Jan 8, 2013, at 10:53 AM, Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Ralph Goers <rg...@apache.org> wrote:
>> I would like to test the bug Joern found with serialization, but that may
>> not be critical to fix. Other than email I generally don't work on ASF
>> stuff much during $work hours, so I will need to find some time. Also, the
>> logging project hasn't converted the distribution site to svnpubsub as infra
>> said needed to happen by the end of the year, so I may run into problems
>> with completing the release.
>
> wait second, release dist too? I thought it was only about websites...
>
> For all who don't know what it is about:
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#upload-scp
>
>> Ralph
>>
>> On Jan 8, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Scott Severtson <ss...@digitalmeasures.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Where do we stand on the 2.0-beta4 release? We're getting ready to roll out
>> Log4J2 to some of our test servers, and I'd like to use an "official"
>> release, rather than my own compile of trunk. We've observed no issues with
>> our relatively recent trunk build.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --Scott
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I took me longer than I wanted but I have finally fixed all the issues I
>>> wanted to complete before doing the 2.0-beta4 release. Please let me know
>>> if you are aware of something else that needs to be done before the release.
>>>
>>> A larger question is whether the subsequent release should be beta5 or
>>> whether we are good to go with the 2.0 GA release.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Ralph
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.grobmeier.de
> https://www.timeandbill.de
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
Re: Next Log4j 2.0 release
Posted by Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Ralph Goers <rg...@apache.org> wrote:
> I would like to test the bug Joern found with serialization, but that may
> not be critical to fix. Other than email I generally don't work on ASF
> stuff much during $work hours, so I will need to find some time. Also, the
> logging project hasn't converted the distribution site to svnpubsub as infra
> said needed to happen by the end of the year, so I may run into problems
> with completing the release.
wait second, release dist too? I thought it was only about websites...
For all who don't know what it is about:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#upload-scp
> Ralph
>
> On Jan 8, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Scott Severtson <ss...@digitalmeasures.com>
> wrote:
>
> Where do we stand on the 2.0-beta4 release? We're getting ready to roll out
> Log4J2 to some of our test servers, and I'd like to use an "official"
> release, rather than my own compile of trunk. We've observed no issues with
> our relatively recent trunk build.
>
> Thanks,
> --Scott
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I took me longer than I wanted but I have finally fixed all the issues I
>> wanted to complete before doing the 2.0-beta4 release. Please let me know
>> if you are aware of something else that needs to be done before the release.
>>
>> A larger question is whether the subsequent release should be beta5 or
>> whether we are good to go with the 2.0 GA release.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Ralph
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>>
>
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
Re: Next Log4j 2.0 release
Posted by Ralph Goers <rg...@apache.org>.
I would like to test the bug Joern found with serialization, but that may not be critical to fix. Other than email I generally don't work on ASF stuff much during $work hours, so I will need to find some time. Also, the logging project hasn't converted the distribution site to svnpubsub as infra said needed to happen by the end of the year, so I may run into problems with completing the release.
Ralph
On Jan 8, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Scott Severtson <ss...@digitalmeasures.com> wrote:
> Where do we stand on the 2.0-beta4 release? We're getting ready to roll out Log4J2 to some of our test servers, and I'd like to use an "official" release, rather than my own compile of trunk. We've observed no issues with our relatively recent trunk build.
>
> Thanks,
> --Scott
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>> I took me longer than I wanted but I have finally fixed all the issues I wanted to complete before doing the 2.0-beta4 release. Please let me know if you are aware of something else that needs to be done before the release.
>>
>> A larger question is whether the subsequent release should be beta5 or whether we are good to go with the 2.0 GA release.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Ralph
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
Re: Next Log4j 2.0 release
Posted by Scott Severtson <ss...@digitalmeasures.com>.
Where do we stand on the 2.0-beta4 release? We're getting ready to roll out
Log4J2 to some of our test servers, and I'd like to use an "official"
release, rather than my own compile of trunk. We've observed no issues with
our relatively recent trunk build.
Thanks,
--Scott
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>wrote:
> I took me longer than I wanted but I have finally fixed all the issues I
> wanted to complete before doing the 2.0-beta4 release. Please let me know
> if you are aware of something else that needs to be done before the release.
>
> A larger question is whether the subsequent release should be beta5 or
> whether we are good to go with the 2.0 GA release.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Ralph
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
>
Re: Next Log4j 2.0 release
Posted by Tushar Kapila <tg...@gmail.com>.
My thoughts are that release can wait up to a month for Scott and
others to look thru and suggest api changes.
I look forward to a release as we are using the new version in dev
only till release.
On 1/2/13, Scott Deboy <sc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I need to go through chainsaw, which requires going through extras. Would
> prefer to do that while in beta, but I don't want to slow down the great
> progress either.
> On Jan 1, 2013 11:37 AM, "Ralph Goers" <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
>> I took me longer than I wanted but I have finally fixed all the issues I
>> wanted to complete before doing the 2.0-beta4 release. Please let me
>> know
>> if you are aware of something else that needs to be done before the
>> release.
>>
>> A larger question is whether the subsequent release should be beta5 or
>> whether we are good to go with the 2.0 GA release.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Ralph
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>>
>>
>
--
Sent from my mobile device
Regards
Tushar Kapila
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
Re: Next Log4j 2.0 release
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
On Jan 2, 2013, at 2:15 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Scott Deboy <sc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I need to go through chainsaw, which requires going through extras. Would
>> prefer to do that while in beta, but I don't want to slow down the great
>> progress either.
>
> Do you expect any incompatibility or so? Or do think about making
> extras log4j2 compatible?
I have gone through the extras code a couple of times and brought in code into Log4j 2 that I thought was useful. What else needs to be dealt with? I'm not sure I see the point in making extras itself compatible.
Ralph
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
Re: Next Log4j 2.0 release
Posted by Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Scott Deboy <sc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I need to go through chainsaw, which requires going through extras. Would
> prefer to do that while in beta, but I don't want to slow down the great
> progress either.
Do you expect any incompatibility or so? Or do think about making
extras log4j2 compatible?
Cheers
> On Jan 1, 2013 11:37 AM, "Ralph Goers" <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>
>> I took me longer than I wanted but I have finally fixed all the issues I
>> wanted to complete before doing the 2.0-beta4 release. Please let me know
>> if you are aware of something else that needs to be done before the release.
>>
>> A larger question is whether the subsequent release should be beta5 or
>> whether we are good to go with the 2.0 GA release.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Ralph
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>>
>
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
Re: Next Log4j 2.0 release
Posted by Scott Deboy <sc...@gmail.com>.
I need to go through chainsaw, which requires going through extras. Would
prefer to do that while in beta, but I don't want to slow down the great
progress either.
On Jan 1, 2013 11:37 AM, "Ralph Goers" <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> I took me longer than I wanted but I have finally fixed all the issues I
> wanted to complete before doing the 2.0-beta4 release. Please let me know
> if you are aware of something else that needs to be done before the release.
>
> A larger question is whether the subsequent release should be beta5 or
> whether we are good to go with the 2.0 GA release.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Ralph
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
>
Re: Next Log4j 2.0 release
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
On Jan 2, 2013, at 4:50 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Jan 1, 2013, at 14:37, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
>> I took me longer than I wanted but I have finally fixed all the issues I wanted to complete before doing the 2.0-beta4 release. Please let me know if you are aware of something else that needs to be done before the release.
>>
>> A larger question is whether the subsequent release should be beta5 or whether we are good to go with the 2.0 GA release.
>
> For beta 5, I'd like to add a JDBC appender. We use one at work for
> certain set ups. Alternatively, can flume to set up to log to a
> database?
>
Flume is basically an event bus. If you have a setup with web, application and data tiers and you don't want your web tier to have a jdbc connection to the data tier then you could use Flume to send the events to the application tier to be written. Flume also acts as an aggregator so that if you have 10 instances they can all write to Flume where you then only have a single connection to the data repository.
I'm not a huge fan of using a relational database as the repository for logging events but if a DBAppender is needed then lets add it.
Ralph
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
Re: Next Log4j 2.0 release
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
On Jan 1, 2013, at 14:37, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> I took me longer than I wanted but I have finally fixed all the issues I wanted to complete before doing the 2.0-beta4 release. Please let me know if you are aware of something else that needs to be done before the release.
>
> A larger question is whether the subsequent release should be beta5 or whether we are good to go with the 2.0 GA release.
For beta 5, I'd like to add a JDBC appender. We use one at work for
certain set ups. Alternatively, can flume to set up to log to a
database?
Gary
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Ralph
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org