You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@freemarker.apache.org by Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu> on 2015/09/12 10:02:38 UTC
Fwd: [Mentors] Starting IP clearance process?
Just wanted to bring the below mail to your attention, as it was now 9
days without any reaction.
This is a forwarded message
From: Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu>
To: dev@freemarker.incubator.apache.org
Date: Thursday, September 3, 2015, 12:56:50 AM
Subject: [Mentors] Starting IP clearance process?
===8<==============Original message text===============
Dear Mentors (and others who want to help),
We have the 3 repos (freemarker, docgen, site) imported as you might
noticed from the flood of commit messages (sorry...), and I have
changed the copyright headers, ensured that the 3 standard legal files
(NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER) are there, and removed files that I
have spotted with unclear copyright. So, gloss over the 3 projects if
you want to, and then I think I should add a tag like "ip-clearance",
and the more official review could be started. Or something like
that... Please advise!
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
===8<===========End of original message text===========
Re: [Mentors] Starting IP clearance process?
Posted by Sergio Fernández <se...@redlink.co>.
So far looks good, Jacopo, so go ahead.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 2:20 PM, jean-frederic clere <jf...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 09/23/2015 10:22 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 21, 2015, at 7:02 PM, Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>>
>> OK. If it's good enough for ASF, it's surely good for me.
>>>
>>> (What will bit a bit funny though, is that in the last monthly report
>>> I have stated that we are starting the IP clearance soon, also some
>>> PPMC members have signed that. Now it turns out that it was already
>>> done... Whatever.)
>>>
>>
>> It should be fine, you could write something like this in your next
>> report:
>>
>> the IP clearance process is now complete given that:
>> 1) FreeMarker was already licensed under the ASL 2.0
>> 2) Software License Agreements have been collected (and have been filed
>> by the ASF Secretary) for the former copyright owners that are no more
>> active and involved in the project
>> 3) Contributor License Agreements have been collected (and have been
>> filed by the ASF Secretary) for the main contributors of the project, that
>> are now committers of the incubating project
>> 4) notices in the project mailing lists and website have been published
>> to announce that the project is now incubating @ASF and to invite potential
>> contributors to participate in the new home
>> 5) license headers have been updated to reflect the new copyright
>>
>> To all, please review my notes above and correct them if you see any
>> errors.
>>
>
> +1
>
> Cheers
>
> Jean-Frederic
>
--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co
Re: [Mentors] Starting IP clearance process?
Posted by jean-frederic clere <jf...@gmail.com>.
On 09/23/2015 10:22 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>
> On Sep 21, 2015, at 7:02 PM, Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>
>> OK. If it's good enough for ASF, it's surely good for me.
>>
>> (What will bit a bit funny though, is that in the last monthly report
>> I have stated that we are starting the IP clearance soon, also some
>> PPMC members have signed that. Now it turns out that it was already
>> done... Whatever.)
>
> It should be fine, you could write something like this in your next report:
>
> the IP clearance process is now complete given that:
> 1) FreeMarker was already licensed under the ASL 2.0
> 2) Software License Agreements have been collected (and have been filed by the ASF Secretary) for the former copyright owners that are no more active and involved in the project
> 3) Contributor License Agreements have been collected (and have been filed by the ASF Secretary) for the main contributors of the project, that are now committers of the incubating project
> 4) notices in the project mailing lists and website have been published to announce that the project is now incubating @ASF and to invite potential contributors to participate in the new home
> 5) license headers have been updated to reflect the new copyright
>
> To all, please review my notes above and correct them if you see any errors.
+1
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Re: [Mentors] Starting IP clearance process?
Posted by Jacopo Cappellato <ja...@gmail.com>.
On Sep 21, 2015, at 7:02 PM, Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
> OK. If it's good enough for ASF, it's surely good for me.
>
> (What will bit a bit funny though, is that in the last monthly report
> I have stated that we are starting the IP clearance soon, also some
> PPMC members have signed that. Now it turns out that it was already
> done... Whatever.)
It should be fine, you could write something like this in your next report:
the IP clearance process is now complete given that:
1) FreeMarker was already licensed under the ASL 2.0
2) Software License Agreements have been collected (and have been filed by the ASF Secretary) for the former copyright owners that are no more active and involved in the project
3) Contributor License Agreements have been collected (and have been filed by the ASF Secretary) for the main contributors of the project, that are now committers of the incubating project
4) notices in the project mailing lists and website have been published to announce that the project is now incubating @ASF and to invite potential contributors to participate in the new home
5) license headers have been updated to reflect the new copyright
To all, please review my notes above and correct them if you see any errors.
Jacopo
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Daniel Dekany
>
>
> Monday, September 21, 2015, 9:43:54 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 20, 2015, at 6:09 PM, Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>>
>>> I also hope that there's no much to do at this point, however, my
>>> understanding was that clearance has to be voted:
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#poding-ip-clearance
>>
>> I am saying we are done because of the following document
>> (referenced by the document you mention above):
>>
>> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
>>
>> and specifically:
>>
>> "This form is not for new projects. This is for projects and PMCs
>> that have already been created and are receiving a code donation into an existing codebase."
>>
>> This also adds some interesting details:
>>
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-ip-clearance
>>
>> quoting:
>>
>> "Existing codebases need to be imported through the standard IP
>> clearance process. This means that a Software Grant Agreement (SGA)
>> or Contributor License Agreement (CLA) need to be submitted for all
>> copyright owners. This process may take a while so it is best to
>> start as soon as the podling is accepted. The acceptance of the
>> initial codebases is approved by the IPMC as part of the acceptance
>> motion. So, no vote is required by the PPMC."
>>
>>>
>>> BTW, at the end of September, I hope to be able to do
>>> 2.3.24-RC1-incubating at last, and I hope there will be no
>>> bureaucratic obstacles. Let me know if any of you know of any!
>>
>> I don't. A tool that is useful to prepare and audit the release is the following:
>>
>> http://creadur.apache.org/rat/
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks,
>>> Daniel Dekany
>>>
>>>
>>> Sunday, September 20, 2015, 5:14:17 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>
>>>> Daniel,
>>>>
>>>> I think we are done with the IP clearance process at this point,
>>>> the required CLAs and SFAs are all filed.
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>
>>>> Jacopo
>>>>
>>>> References:
>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-clean-up
>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-ip-clearance
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 12, 2015, at 3:31 PM, Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Saturday, September 12, 2015, 10:49:37 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Daniel, sorry, I'll try to go through this on Monday.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For provenance purposes what it's important is to have tagged in both repos
>>>>>> (original and asf) the concrete version that has been donated.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have added "donated-to-asf" tags in both the GitHub and ASF repos.
>>>>> More precisely, as the "freemarker" repository (as opposed to the
>>>>> "site" and "docgen" repos) has 3 branches ("2.3-gae", "2.3" and
>>>>> "master"), there we have "2.3-gae-donated-to-asf" and
>>>>> "2.3-donated-to-asf" and "master-donated-to-asf", respectively.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Daniel Dekany
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sep 12, 2015 10:02 AM, "Daniel Dekany" <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just wanted to bring the below mail to your attention, as it was now 9
>>>>>>> days without any reaction.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is a forwarded message
>>>>>>> From: Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu>
>>>>>>> To: dev@freemarker.incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> Date: Thursday, September 3, 2015, 12:56:50 AM
>>>>>>> Subject: [Mentors] Starting IP clearance process?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ===8<==============Original message text===============
>>>>>>> Dear Mentors (and others who want to help),
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We have the 3 repos (freemarker, docgen, site) imported as you might
>>>>>>> noticed from the flood of commit messages (sorry...), and I have
>>>>>>> changed the copyright headers, ensured that the 3 standard legal files
>>>>>>> (NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER) are there, and removed files that I
>>>>>>> have spotted with unclear copyright. So, gloss over the 3 projects if
>>>>>>> you want to, and then I think I should add a tag like "ip-clearance",
>>>>>>> and the more official review could be started. Or something like
>>>>>>> that... Please advise!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Daniel Dekany
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ===8<===========End of original message text===========
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [Mentors] Starting IP clearance process?
Posted by Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu>.
OK. If it's good enough for ASF, it's surely good for me.
(What will bit a bit funny though, is that in the last monthly report
I have stated that we are starting the IP clearance soon, also some
PPMC members have signed that. Now it turns out that it was already
done... Whatever.)
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
Monday, September 21, 2015, 9:43:54 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>
> On Sep 20, 2015, at 6:09 PM, Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>
>> I also hope that there's no much to do at this point, however, my
>> understanding was that clearance has to be voted:
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#poding-ip-clearance
>
> I am saying we are done because of the following document
> (referenced by the document you mention above):
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
>
> and specifically:
>
> "This form is not for new projects. This is for projects and PMCs
> that have already been created and are receiving a code donation into an existing codebase."
>
> This also adds some interesting details:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-ip-clearance
>
> quoting:
>
> "Existing codebases need to be imported through the standard IP
> clearance process. This means that a Software Grant Agreement (SGA)
> or Contributor License Agreement (CLA) need to be submitted for all
> copyright owners. This process may take a while so it is best to
> start as soon as the podling is accepted. The acceptance of the
> initial codebases is approved by the IPMC as part of the acceptance
> motion. So, no vote is required by the PPMC."
>
>>
>> BTW, at the end of September, I hope to be able to do
>> 2.3.24-RC1-incubating at last, and I hope there will be no
>> bureaucratic obstacles. Let me know if any of you know of any!
>
> I don't. A tool that is useful to prepare and audit the release is the following:
>
> http://creadur.apache.org/rat/
>
> Regards,
>
> Jacopo
>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel Dekany
>>
>>
>> Sunday, September 20, 2015, 5:14:17 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>
>>> Daniel,
>>>
>>> I think we are done with the IP clearance process at this point,
>>> the required CLAs and SFAs are all filed.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>> References:
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-clean-up
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-ip-clearance
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 12, 2015, at 3:31 PM, Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Saturday, September 12, 2015, 10:49:37 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Daniel, sorry, I'll try to go through this on Monday.
>>>>>
>>>>> For provenance purposes what it's important is to have tagged in both repos
>>>>> (original and asf) the concrete version that has been donated.
>>>>
>>>> I have added "donated-to-asf" tags in both the GitHub and ASF repos.
>>>> More precisely, as the "freemarker" repository (as opposed to the
>>>> "site" and "docgen" repos) has 3 branches ("2.3-gae", "2.3" and
>>>> "master"), there we have "2.3-gae-donated-to-asf" and
>>>> "2.3-donated-to-asf" and "master-donated-to-asf", respectively.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Daniel Dekany
>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 12, 2015 10:02 AM, "Daniel Dekany" <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Just wanted to bring the below mail to your attention, as it was now 9
>>>>>> days without any reaction.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a forwarded message
>>>>>> From: Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu>
>>>>>> To: dev@freemarker.incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> Date: Thursday, September 3, 2015, 12:56:50 AM
>>>>>> Subject: [Mentors] Starting IP clearance process?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ===8<==============Original message text===============
>>>>>> Dear Mentors (and others who want to help),
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have the 3 repos (freemarker, docgen, site) imported as you might
>>>>>> noticed from the flood of commit messages (sorry...), and I have
>>>>>> changed the copyright headers, ensured that the 3 standard legal files
>>>>>> (NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER) are there, and removed files that I
>>>>>> have spotted with unclear copyright. So, gloss over the 3 projects if
>>>>>> you want to, and then I think I should add a tag like "ip-clearance",
>>>>>> and the more official review could be started. Or something like
>>>>>> that... Please advise!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Daniel Dekany
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ===8<===========End of original message text===========
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Re: [Mentors] Starting IP clearance process?
Posted by Jacopo Cappellato <ja...@gmail.com>.
On Sep 20, 2015, at 6:09 PM, Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
> I also hope that there's no much to do at this point, however, my
> understanding was that clearance has to be voted:
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#poding-ip-clearance
I am saying we are done because of the following document (referenced by the document you mention above):
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
and specifically:
"This form is not for new projects. This is for projects and PMCs that have already been created and are receiving a code donation into an existing codebase."
This also adds some interesting details:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-ip-clearance
quoting:
"Existing codebases need to be imported through the standard IP clearance process. This means that a Software Grant Agreement (SGA) or Contributor License Agreement (CLA) need to be submitted for all copyright owners. This process may take a while so it is best to start as soon as the podling is accepted. The acceptance of the initial codebases is approved by the IPMC as part of the acceptance motion. So, no vote is required by the PPMC."
>
> BTW, at the end of September, I hope to be able to do
> 2.3.24-RC1-incubating at last, and I hope there will be no
> bureaucratic obstacles. Let me know if any of you know of any!
I don't. A tool that is useful to prepare and audit the release is the following:
http://creadur.apache.org/rat/
Regards,
Jacopo
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Daniel Dekany
>
>
> Sunday, September 20, 2015, 5:14:17 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>
>> Daniel,
>>
>> I think we are done with the IP clearance process at this point,
>> the required CLAs and SFAs are all filed.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>> References:
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-clean-up
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-ip-clearance
>>
>>
>> On Sep 12, 2015, at 3:31 PM, Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>>
>>> Saturday, September 12, 2015, 10:49:37 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
>>>
>>>> Daniel, sorry, I'll try to go through this on Monday.
>>>>
>>>> For provenance purposes what it's important is to have tagged in both repos
>>>> (original and asf) the concrete version that has been donated.
>>>
>>> I have added "donated-to-asf" tags in both the GitHub and ASF repos.
>>> More precisely, as the "freemarker" repository (as opposed to the
>>> "site" and "docgen" repos) has 3 branches ("2.3-gae", "2.3" and
>>> "master"), there we have "2.3-gae-donated-to-asf" and
>>> "2.3-donated-to-asf" and "master-donated-to-asf", respectively.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks,
>>> Daniel Dekany
>>>
>>>> On Sep 12, 2015 10:02 AM, "Daniel Dekany" <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Just wanted to bring the below mail to your attention, as it was now 9
>>>>> days without any reaction.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a forwarded message
>>>>> From: Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu>
>>>>> To: dev@freemarker.incubator.apache.org
>>>>> Date: Thursday, September 3, 2015, 12:56:50 AM
>>>>> Subject: [Mentors] Starting IP clearance process?
>>>>>
>>>>> ===8<==============Original message text===============
>>>>> Dear Mentors (and others who want to help),
>>>>>
>>>>> We have the 3 repos (freemarker, docgen, site) imported as you might
>>>>> noticed from the flood of commit messages (sorry...), and I have
>>>>> changed the copyright headers, ensured that the 3 standard legal files
>>>>> (NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER) are there, and removed files that I
>>>>> have spotted with unclear copyright. So, gloss over the 3 projects if
>>>>> you want to, and then I think I should add a tag like "ip-clearance",
>>>>> and the more official review could be started. Or something like
>>>>> that... Please advise!
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Daniel Dekany
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ===8<===========End of original message text===========
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [Mentors] Starting IP clearance process?
Posted by Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu>.
I also hope that there's no much to do at this point, however, my
understanding was that clearance has to be voted:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#poding-ip-clearance
BTW, at the end of September, I hope to be able to do
2.3.24-RC1-incubating at last, and I hope there will be no
bureaucratic obstacles. Let me know if any of you know of any!
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
Sunday, September 20, 2015, 5:14:17 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> I think we are done with the IP clearance process at this point,
> the required CLAs and SFAs are all filed.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Jacopo
>
> References:
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-clean-up
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-ip-clearance
>
>
> On Sep 12, 2015, at 3:31 PM, Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>
>> Saturday, September 12, 2015, 10:49:37 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
>>
>>> Daniel, sorry, I'll try to go through this on Monday.
>>>
>>> For provenance purposes what it's important is to have tagged in both repos
>>> (original and asf) the concrete version that has been donated.
>>
>> I have added "donated-to-asf" tags in both the GitHub and ASF repos.
>> More precisely, as the "freemarker" repository (as opposed to the
>> "site" and "docgen" repos) has 3 branches ("2.3-gae", "2.3" and
>> "master"), there we have "2.3-gae-donated-to-asf" and
>> "2.3-donated-to-asf" and "master-donated-to-asf", respectively.
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel Dekany
>>
>>> On Sep 12, 2015 10:02 AM, "Daniel Dekany" <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just wanted to bring the below mail to your attention, as it was now 9
>>>> days without any reaction.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is a forwarded message
>>>> From: Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu>
>>>> To: dev@freemarker.incubator.apache.org
>>>> Date: Thursday, September 3, 2015, 12:56:50 AM
>>>> Subject: [Mentors] Starting IP clearance process?
>>>>
>>>> ===8<==============Original message text===============
>>>> Dear Mentors (and others who want to help),
>>>>
>>>> We have the 3 repos (freemarker, docgen, site) imported as you might
>>>> noticed from the flood of commit messages (sorry...), and I have
>>>> changed the copyright headers, ensured that the 3 standard legal files
>>>> (NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER) are there, and removed files that I
>>>> have spotted with unclear copyright. So, gloss over the 3 projects if
>>>> you want to, and then I think I should add a tag like "ip-clearance",
>>>> and the more official review could be started. Or something like
>>>> that... Please advise!
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Daniel Dekany
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ===8<===========End of original message text===========
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
Re: [Mentors] Starting IP clearance process?
Posted by Jacopo Cappellato <ja...@gmail.com>.
Daniel,
I think we are done with the IP clearance process at this point, the required CLAs and SFAs are all filed.
Kind regards,
Jacopo
References:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-clean-up
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-ip-clearance
On Sep 12, 2015, at 3:31 PM, Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
> Saturday, September 12, 2015, 10:49:37 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
>
>> Daniel, sorry, I'll try to go through this on Monday.
>>
>> For provenance purposes what it's important is to have tagged in both repos
>> (original and asf) the concrete version that has been donated.
>
> I have added "donated-to-asf" tags in both the GitHub and ASF repos.
> More precisely, as the "freemarker" repository (as opposed to the
> "site" and "docgen" repos) has 3 branches ("2.3-gae", "2.3" and
> "master"), there we have "2.3-gae-donated-to-asf" and
> "2.3-donated-to-asf" and "master-donated-to-asf", respectively.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Daniel Dekany
>
>> On Sep 12, 2015 10:02 AM, "Daniel Dekany" <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>>
>>> Just wanted to bring the below mail to your attention, as it was now 9
>>> days without any reaction.
>>>
>>>
>>> This is a forwarded message
>>> From: Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu>
>>> To: dev@freemarker.incubator.apache.org
>>> Date: Thursday, September 3, 2015, 12:56:50 AM
>>> Subject: [Mentors] Starting IP clearance process?
>>>
>>> ===8<==============Original message text===============
>>> Dear Mentors (and others who want to help),
>>>
>>> We have the 3 repos (freemarker, docgen, site) imported as you might
>>> noticed from the flood of commit messages (sorry...), and I have
>>> changed the copyright headers, ensured that the 3 standard legal files
>>> (NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER) are there, and removed files that I
>>> have spotted with unclear copyright. So, gloss over the 3 projects if
>>> you want to, and then I think I should add a tag like "ip-clearance",
>>> and the more official review could be started. Or something like
>>> that... Please advise!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks,
>>> Daniel Dekany
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ===8<===========End of original message text===========
>>>
>>>
>
Re: Fwd: [Mentors] Starting IP clearance process?
Posted by Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu>.
Saturday, September 12, 2015, 10:49:37 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> Daniel, sorry, I'll try to go through this on Monday.
>
> For provenance purposes what it's important is to have tagged in both repos
> (original and asf) the concrete version that has been donated.
I have added "donated-to-asf" tags in both the GitHub and ASF repos.
More precisely, as the "freemarker" repository (as opposed to the
"site" and "docgen" repos) has 3 branches ("2.3-gae", "2.3" and
"master"), there we have "2.3-gae-donated-to-asf" and
"2.3-donated-to-asf" and "master-donated-to-asf", respectively.
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
> On Sep 12, 2015 10:02 AM, "Daniel Dekany" <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>
>> Just wanted to bring the below mail to your attention, as it was now 9
>> days without any reaction.
>>
>>
>> This is a forwarded message
>> From: Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu>
>> To: dev@freemarker.incubator.apache.org
>> Date: Thursday, September 3, 2015, 12:56:50 AM
>> Subject: [Mentors] Starting IP clearance process?
>>
>> ===8<==============Original message text===============
>> Dear Mentors (and others who want to help),
>>
>> We have the 3 repos (freemarker, docgen, site) imported as you might
>> noticed from the flood of commit messages (sorry...), and I have
>> changed the copyright headers, ensured that the 3 standard legal files
>> (NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER) are there, and removed files that I
>> have spotted with unclear copyright. So, gloss over the 3 projects if
>> you want to, and then I think I should add a tag like "ip-clearance",
>> and the more official review could be started. Or something like
>> that... Please advise!
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel Dekany
>>
>>
>>
>> ===8<===========End of original message text===========
>>
>>
Re: Fwd: [Mentors] Starting IP clearance process?
Posted by Sergio Fernández <se...@redlink.co>.
Daniel, sorry, I'll try to go through this on Monday.
For provenance purposes what it's important is to have tagged in both repos
(original and asf) the concrete version that has been donated.
On Sep 12, 2015 10:02 AM, "Daniel Dekany" <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
> Just wanted to bring the below mail to your attention, as it was now 9
> days without any reaction.
>
>
> This is a forwarded message
> From: Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu>
> To: dev@freemarker.incubator.apache.org
> Date: Thursday, September 3, 2015, 12:56:50 AM
> Subject: [Mentors] Starting IP clearance process?
>
> ===8<==============Original message text===============
> Dear Mentors (and others who want to help),
>
> We have the 3 repos (freemarker, docgen, site) imported as you might
> noticed from the flood of commit messages (sorry...), and I have
> changed the copyright headers, ensured that the 3 standard legal files
> (NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER) are there, and removed files that I
> have spotted with unclear copyright. So, gloss over the 3 projects if
> you want to, and then I think I should add a tag like "ip-clearance",
> and the more official review could be started. Or something like
> that... Please advise!
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Daniel Dekany
>
>
>
> ===8<===========End of original message text===========
>
>