You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by "Peter Klügl (JIRA)" <de...@uima.apache.org> on 2013/07/29 16:51:48 UTC
[jira] [Assigned] (UIMA-3115) fusion of block syntax and annotation
specification syntax
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Peter Klügl reassigned UIMA-3115:
---------------------------------
Assignee: Peter Klügl
> fusion of block syntax and annotation specification syntax
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: UIMA-3115
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3115
> Project: UIMA
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: ruta
> Reporter: Georg Fette
> Assignee: Peter Klügl
> Priority: Minor
>
> It would be a nice syntax improvement if block definitions and annotation specifications with curly brackets are written with the same syntax. I.e.:
> {noformat}
> Document { CW NUM { -> MARK(MyAnnot) } }
> {noformat}
> =
> {noformat}
> BLOCK(MyBlockName) Document { CW NUM { -> MARK(MyAnnot) } }
> {noformat}
> The style without the block syntax will be an anonymous block but that would be okay.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira