You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jena.apache.org by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> on 2017/03/09 13:03:45 UTC

Coordination on some JIRA in progress.

Thee are some JIRA outstanding I have in progress. With the update of 
Lucene coming up, I wanted to report where I was.

I'll hold back on all changes so as not to make it more fiddly for the 
Lucene switch. I don't think any affect Lucene at all.


JENA-1302 : Lucene commit error

I think I have found the problem in DatasetGraphText.  A change of 
Lucene version will not help - it's a Jena bug of failing to lock 
briefly during the commit to both Lucene and TDB.  A first pass fix 
worked for me - I want to do a deeper analysis and checking before 
applying a fix to the codebase.

(TDB2's general transaction system can handle this better.)


JENA-1306: RDFParser
PR#222

This is ready to go in.  This is not a bug fix so waiting for a bit is 
fine.

It'll help PR#211 (JSON-LD and preserving bnode labels)


JENA-1300 "Using alternative path in Fuseki runs forever"

To do anything about this report, it needs an executable test case. If 
that is not forth coming, I intend to close this; it seems to relate to 
the shape of the data. I'm not going to guess at possibilities in the 
hope I stumble across something. I have not a response to a change to 
the query to see what happens.

	Andy

Re: Coordination on some JIRA in progress.

Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
Osma - no rush, when you have time.

If it works better for you, I can do these before and get them into 
snapshots to confirm everything.

	Andy

On 09/03/17 13:34, Osma Suominen wrote:
> Hi Andy!
>
> I will try to get the Lucene upgrade in soon. I just want to catch the
> exceptions caused by trying to use an old index and inform the user
> about the need to recreate the index, as Rob suggested.
>
> -Osma
>
> 09.03.2017, 15:03, Andy Seaborne kirjoitti:
>> Thee are some JIRA outstanding I have in progress. With the update of
>> Lucene coming up, I wanted to report where I was.
>>
>> I'll hold back on all changes so as not to make it more fiddly for the
>> Lucene switch. I don't think any affect Lucene at all.
>>
>>
>> JENA-1302 : Lucene commit error
>>
>> I think I have found the problem in DatasetGraphText.  A change of
>> Lucene version will not help - it's a Jena bug of failing to lock
>> briefly during the commit to both Lucene and TDB.  A first pass fix
>> worked for me - I want to do a deeper analysis and checking before
>> applying a fix to the codebase.
>>
>> (TDB2's general transaction system can handle this better.)
>>
>>
>> JENA-1306: RDFParser
>> PR#222
>>
>> This is ready to go in.  This is not a bug fix so waiting for a bit is
>> fine.
>>
>> It'll help PR#211 (JSON-LD and preserving bnode labels)
>>
>>
>> JENA-1300 "Using alternative path in Fuseki runs forever"
>>
>> To do anything about this report, it needs an executable test case. If
>> that is not forth coming, I intend to close this; it seems to relate to
>> the shape of the data. I'm not going to guess at possibilities in the
>> hope I stumble across something. I have not a response to a change to
>> the query to see what happens.
>>
>>     Andy
>
>

Re: Coordination on some JIRA in progress.

Posted by Osma Suominen <os...@helsinki.fi>.
Hi Andy!

I will try to get the Lucene upgrade in soon. I just want to catch the 
exceptions caused by trying to use an old index and inform the user 
about the need to recreate the index, as Rob suggested.

-Osma

09.03.2017, 15:03, Andy Seaborne kirjoitti:
> Thee are some JIRA outstanding I have in progress. With the update of
> Lucene coming up, I wanted to report where I was.
>
> I'll hold back on all changes so as not to make it more fiddly for the
> Lucene switch. I don't think any affect Lucene at all.
>
>
> JENA-1302 : Lucene commit error
>
> I think I have found the problem in DatasetGraphText.  A change of
> Lucene version will not help - it's a Jena bug of failing to lock
> briefly during the commit to both Lucene and TDB.  A first pass fix
> worked for me - I want to do a deeper analysis and checking before
> applying a fix to the codebase.
>
> (TDB2's general transaction system can handle this better.)
>
>
> JENA-1306: RDFParser
> PR#222
>
> This is ready to go in.  This is not a bug fix so waiting for a bit is
> fine.
>
> It'll help PR#211 (JSON-LD and preserving bnode labels)
>
>
> JENA-1300 "Using alternative path in Fuseki runs forever"
>
> To do anything about this report, it needs an executable test case. If
> that is not forth coming, I intend to close this; it seems to relate to
> the shape of the data. I'm not going to guess at possibilities in the
> hope I stumble across something. I have not a response to a change to
> the query to see what happens.
>
>     Andy


-- 
Osma Suominen
D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist
National Library of Finland
P.O. Box 26 (Kaikukatu 4)
00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO
Tel. +358 50 3199529
osma.suominen@helsinki.fi
http://www.nationallibrary.fi