You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@iktek.com> on 2006/09/03 22:20:10 UTC
[ADS 2.0] (was : Re: svn commit: r439770 - /directory/sandbox/akarasulu/apacheds-2.0/shared/ldap/src/main/java/org/apache/directory/shared/ldap/name/LdapDN.java)
Ersin Er a écrit :
> Yes, I understood you intent. But I think LdapDN can also be an
> interface extending Name. So we can clearly see what it adds to Name.
LdapDN is and will continue to implement Name. But as it will become an
interface, it will 'extends' - instead of 'implement' - Name interface :)
>
> On 9/3/06, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ersin Er a écrit :
>>
>> > Sorry, let me correct my sentence:
>> >
>> > I prefer interfaces to classes for "compilation purposes". ;-)
>>
>> Yes, me two. But my svn message wasn't very clear :) Whay I tried to
>> mean was : "Added a skeleton to avoid compilation errors" ...
>>
>> However, in this very case, LdapDN is really a class, but it implements
>> javax.naming.name interface, so I think this is OK for LdapDN to be a
>> class.
>>
>> >
>> > On 9/3/06, Ersin Er <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I prefer interfaces to classes to "compilation purposes". ;-)
>> >>
>> >> On 9/3/06, elecharny@apache.org <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >> > Author: elecharny
>> >> > Date: Sun Sep 3 05:46:30 2006
>> >> > New Revision: 439770
>> >> >
>> >> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=439770&view=rev
>> >> > Log:
>> >> > Added a skeleton of LdapDN message. This is for compilation
>> purpose.
>> >> >
>> >> > Added:
>> >> >
>> >>
>> directory/sandbox/akarasulu/apacheds-2.0/shared/ldap/src/main/java/org/apache/directory/shared/ldap/name/LdapDN.java
>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
Re: [ADS 2.0] (was : Re: svn commit: r439770 - /directory/sandbox/akarasulu/apacheds-2.0/shared/ldap/src/main/java/org/apache/directory/shared/ldap/name/LdapDN.java)
Posted by Ersin Er <er...@gmail.com>.
My preferences:
interface LdapDN extends Name
class BasicLdapDN implements LdapDN
class ServerLdapDN implements LdapDN
BTW, what is the difference between client (basic) and server versions
? If they have different functionality we can design interfaces for
them too :-D
And I think we need to design most parts of the system with first
interfaces only.
Cheers,
On 9/3/06, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@iktek.com> wrote:
> Ersin Er a écrit :
>
> > Yes, I understood you intent. But I think LdapDN can also be an
> > interface extending Name. So we can clearly see what it adds to Name.
>
>
> LdapDN is and will continue to implement Name. But as it will become an
> interface, it will 'extends' - instead of 'implement' - Name interface :)
>
> >
> > On 9/3/06, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Ersin Er a écrit :
> >>
> >> > Sorry, let me correct my sentence:
> >> >
> >> > I prefer interfaces to classes for "compilation purposes". ;-)
> >>
> >> Yes, me two. But my svn message wasn't very clear :) Whay I tried to
> >> mean was : "Added a skeleton to avoid compilation errors" ...
> >>
> >> However, in this very case, LdapDN is really a class, but it implements
> >> javax.naming.name interface, so I think this is OK for LdapDN to be a
> >> class.
> >>
> >> >
> >> > On 9/3/06, Ersin Er <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I prefer interfaces to classes to "compilation purposes". ;-)
> >> >>
> >> >> On 9/3/06, elecharny@apache.org <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> >> > Author: elecharny
> >> >> > Date: Sun Sep 3 05:46:30 2006
> >> >> > New Revision: 439770
> >> >> >
> >> >> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=439770&view=rev
> >> >> > Log:
> >> >> > Added a skeleton of LdapDN message. This is for compilation
> >> purpose.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Added:
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> directory/sandbox/akarasulu/apacheds-2.0/shared/ldap/src/main/java/org/apache/directory/shared/ldap/name/LdapDN.java
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>
> To: Ersin Er <er...@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 21:59:18 +0200
> Subject: [ADS 2.0] (was : Re: svn commit: r439770 - /directory/sandbox/akarasulu/apacheds-2.0/shared/ldap/src/main/java/org/apache/directory/shared/ldap/name/LdapDN.java)
> Ersin Er a écrit :
>
> > Yes, I understood you intent. But I think LdapDN can also be an
> > interface extending Name. So we can clearly see what it adds to Name.
>
> LdapDN is and will continue to implement Name. But as it will become an
> interface, it will 'extends' - instead of 'implement' - Name interface :)
>
> >
> > On 9/3/06, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Ersin Er a écrit :
> >>
> >> > Sorry, let me correct my sentence:
> >> >
> >> > I prefer interfaces to classes for "compilation purposes". ;-)
> >>
> >> Yes, me two. But my svn message wasn't very clear :) Whay I tried to
> >> mean was : "Added a skeleton to avoid compilation errors" ...
> >>
> >> However, in this very case, LdapDN is really a class, but it implements
> >> javax.naming.name interface, so I think this is OK for LdapDN to be a
> >> class.
> >>
> >> >
> >> > On 9/3/06, Ersin Er <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I prefer interfaces to classes to "compilation purposes". ;-)
> >> >>
> >> >> On 9/3/06, elecharny@apache.org <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> >> > Author: elecharny
> >> >> > Date: Sun Sep 3 05:46:30 2006
> >> >> > New Revision: 439770
> >> >> >
> >> >> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=439770&view=rev
> >> >> > Log:
> >> >> > Added a skeleton of LdapDN message. This is for compilation
> >> purpose.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Added:
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> directory/sandbox/akarasulu/apacheds-2.0/shared/ldap/src/main/java/org/apache/directory/shared/ldap/name/LdapDN.java
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Ersin