You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Bryan Pendleton (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/09/30 18:34:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (DERBY-6965) Community page describing contribution process has stale testing section

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Bryan Pendleton updated DERBY-6965:
-----------------------------------
    Attachment: siteDocs.diff
                derby_comm.html
                derby_source.html

Attached 'siteDocs.diff' contains the updates I propose to improve the "testing" sections of the derby web site docs.

I also attached the built versions of derby_comm and derby_source so you can click on them and let me know what you think!

> Community page describing contribution process has stale testing section
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6965
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6965
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Web Site
>            Reporter: Bryan Pendleton
>            Assignee: Bryan Pendleton
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: derby_comm.html, derby_source.html, siteDocs.diff
>
>
> The "Contribute Code or Documentation" page at http://db.apache.org/derby/derby_comm.html#Contribute+Code+or+Documentation
> is out of date, specifically w.r.t. the testing process. Running the old derbyall test harness is no longer the standard process (although it does no harm, it doesn't really run the important set of tests).
> The following changes should be made:
> # The page should contain a link to the wiki testing page: https://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTopLevelJunitTests
> # The item "run the tests" on the page should say to run 'ant junitreport'.
> # We could still include the suggestion to run derbyall with the old harness, but I suggest that we remove that, because it's pretty arcane and (IMO) not really necessary.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)