You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Radhika PC <ra...@citrix.com> on 2013/02/06 07:26:56 UTC

Re: Review Request: Support for Egress Firewall Rule

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Feb. 6, 2013, 6:26 a.m.)


Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley, Chip Childers, and Jessica Tomechak.


Changes
-------

this patch addresses the issue reported in the review


Description
-------

Documentation on egress firewall rule support


Diffs (updated)
-----

  docs/en-US/add-ingress-egress-rules.xml 2490cec 
  docs/en-US/egress-firewall-rule.xml PRE-CREATION 
  docs/en-US/firewall-rules.xml 01d072b 
  docs/en-US/images/egress-firewall-rule.png PRE-CREATION 
  docs/en-US/ip-forwarding-firewalling.xml c154b07 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/diff/


Testing
-------

Publican builds cleanly. Patch cleanly applies.


Thanks,

Radhika PC


Re: Review Request: Support for Egress Firewall Rule

Posted by Radhika PC <ra...@citrix.com>.

> On Feb. 14, 2013, 2:22 p.m., David Nalley wrote:
> > So this applies cleanly on 4.1 and master
> > 
> > However, when I try and build the admin guide I get the following validation error (it passes the test, but won't render a doc) 
> > Validation failed: 
> > creating-network-offerings.xml:215: validity error : IDREF attribute linkend references an unknown ID "firewall-rules"
> > 
> >

I had fixed this IDREF issue in my last patch for persistent network which has changes to creating-network-offering.xml!!!

creating-network-offering.xml is a tricky file. Last patch failed on both master and 4.1 because of the same file but different reasons. And I realized that latest changes on the same file is submitted with the patch on persistent network. 

Now, I will create another patch based on the latest changes gone with persistent network. 


- Radhika


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/#review16578
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 6, 2013, 6:26 a.m., Radhika PC wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 6, 2013, 6:26 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley, Chip Childers, and Jessica Tomechak.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Documentation on egress firewall rule support
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/en-US/add-ingress-egress-rules.xml 2490cec 
>   docs/en-US/egress-firewall-rule.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/en-US/firewall-rules.xml 01d072b 
>   docs/en-US/images/egress-firewall-rule.png PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/en-US/ip-forwarding-firewalling.xml c154b07 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Publican builds cleanly. Patch cleanly applies.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Radhika PC
> 
>


Re: Review Request: Support for Egress Firewall Rule

Posted by David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/#review16578
-----------------------------------------------------------


So this applies cleanly on 4.1 and master

However, when I try and build the admin guide I get the following validation error (it passes the test, but won't render a doc) 
Validation failed: 
creating-network-offerings.xml:215: validity error : IDREF attribute linkend references an unknown ID "firewall-rules"



- David Nalley


On Feb. 6, 2013, 6:26 a.m., Radhika PC wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 6, 2013, 6:26 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley, Chip Childers, and Jessica Tomechak.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Documentation on egress firewall rule support
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/en-US/add-ingress-egress-rules.xml 2490cec 
>   docs/en-US/egress-firewall-rule.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/en-US/firewall-rules.xml 01d072b 
>   docs/en-US/images/egress-firewall-rule.png PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/en-US/ip-forwarding-firewalling.xml c154b07 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Publican builds cleanly. Patch cleanly applies.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Radhika PC
> 
>


Re: Review Request: Support for Egress Firewall Rule

Posted by Pranav Saxena <pr...@citrix.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/#review16646
-----------------------------------------------------------


Patch applied cleanly to both master and 4.1 . Merged to both the branches - 
master - Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-cloudstack/commit/2beb66fd
4.1 - Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-cloudstack/commit/d11505f4

Please mark the review request as Submitted . 

Thanks !

- Pranav Saxena


On Feb. 14, 2013, 4:41 p.m., Radhika PC wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 14, 2013, 4:41 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley, Chip Childers, and Jessica Tomechak.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Documentation on egress firewall rule support
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/en-US/creating-network-offerings.xml df39242 
>   docs/en-US/egress-firewall-rule.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/en-US/firewall-rules.xml 01d072b 
>   docs/en-US/images/egress-firewall-rule.png PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/en-US/ip-forwarding-firewalling.xml c154b07 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Publican builds cleanly. Patch cleanly applies.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Radhika PC
> 
>


Re: Review Request: Support for Egress Firewall Rule

Posted by Radhika PC <ra...@citrix.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Feb. 14, 2013, 4:41 p.m.)


Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley, Chip Childers, and Jessica Tomechak.


Changes
-------

Fixes the IDREF issues. Please submit the patch to the master. I am yet to submit another patch for 4.1 as both are diverged. 


Description
-------

Documentation on egress firewall rule support


Diffs
-----

  docs/en-US/creating-network-offerings.xml df39242 
  docs/en-US/egress-firewall-rule.xml PRE-CREATION 
  docs/en-US/firewall-rules.xml 01d072b 
  docs/en-US/images/egress-firewall-rule.png PRE-CREATION 
  docs/en-US/ip-forwarding-firewalling.xml c154b07 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/diff/


Testing
-------

Publican builds cleanly. Patch cleanly applies.


Thanks,

Radhika PC


Re: Review Request: Support for Egress Firewall Rule

Posted by Radhika PC <ra...@citrix.com>.

> On Feb. 14, 2013, 2:59 p.m., Jayapal Reddy wrote:
> > docs/en-US/egress-firewall-rule.xml, line 40
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/diff/2/?file=256012#file256012line40>
> >
> >     TCP, UDP, ICMP and ALL protocol. 
> >     Please add the 'ALL' also.
> >     Protocol 'ALL' is allow all the traffic.

ALL ~ or all the three

already mentioned.


- Radhika


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/#review16581
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 14, 2013, 4:41 p.m., Radhika PC wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 14, 2013, 4:41 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley, Chip Childers, and Jessica Tomechak.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Documentation on egress firewall rule support
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/en-US/creating-network-offerings.xml df39242 
>   docs/en-US/egress-firewall-rule.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/en-US/firewall-rules.xml 01d072b 
>   docs/en-US/images/egress-firewall-rule.png PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/en-US/ip-forwarding-firewalling.xml c154b07 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Publican builds cleanly. Patch cleanly applies.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Radhika PC
> 
>


Re: Review Request: Support for Egress Firewall Rule

Posted by Jayapal Reddy <ja...@citrix.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/#review16581
-----------------------------------------------------------



docs/en-US/egress-firewall-rule.xml
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/#comment35168>

    TCP, UDP, ICMP and ALL protocol. 
    Please add the 'ALL' also.
    Protocol 'ALL' is allow all the traffic.


- Jayapal Reddy


On Feb. 6, 2013, 6:26 a.m., Radhika PC wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 6, 2013, 6:26 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley, Chip Childers, and Jessica Tomechak.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Documentation on egress firewall rule support
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/en-US/add-ingress-egress-rules.xml 2490cec 
>   docs/en-US/egress-firewall-rule.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/en-US/firewall-rules.xml 01d072b 
>   docs/en-US/images/egress-firewall-rule.png PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/en-US/ip-forwarding-firewalling.xml c154b07 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Publican builds cleanly. Patch cleanly applies.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Radhika PC
> 
>


Re: Review Request: Support for Egress Firewall Rule

Posted by Radhika PC <ra...@citrix.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Feb. 14, 2013, 4:41 p.m.)


Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley, Chip Childers, and Jessica Tomechak.


Changes
-------

Fixes the IDREF issues. Please submit the patch to the master. I am yet to submit another patch for 4.1 as both are diverged. 


Description
-------

Documentation on egress firewall rule support


Diffs (updated)
-----

  docs/en-US/creating-network-offerings.xml df39242 
  docs/en-US/egress-firewall-rule.xml PRE-CREATION 
  docs/en-US/firewall-rules.xml 01d072b 
  docs/en-US/images/egress-firewall-rule.png PRE-CREATION 
  docs/en-US/ip-forwarding-firewalling.xml c154b07 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/diff/


Testing
-------

Publican builds cleanly. Patch cleanly applies.


Thanks,

Radhika PC