You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@couchdb.apache.org by Stéphane Mourey <st...@gmail.com> on 2010/03/02 11:44:13 UTC
rpm for lucene extension
Hi all,
I've install couchdb using yum, so I would like to keep the same
installation method for the lucene extension. I googled a while, but did not
find any rpm package available.
Is anyone aware of an rpm package available somewhere for this? or another
extension enabling full-text search?
or must I proceed with the source? where can I find a easy tuto for this on
CentOS or Fedora?
Thanks for your help.
Best regards,
BrokenClock
Re: rpm for lucene extension
Posted by Stéphane Mourey <st...@gmail.com>.
Do you have a idear of when it should be available?
2010/3/2 Robert Newson <ro...@gmail.com>
> I'm hoping to ship an .rpm and a .deb for the 0.5 release. I'm away on
> business so I haven't made any progress on that yet.
>
> B.
>
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Markus Jelsma <ma...@buyways.nl> wrote:
> > Maven won't work properly using gcj, use Sun Java instead.
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-user/201001.mbox/%3Cvmime.4b5656ca.3080.2defb5e9d48fd3ff@animal.buyways.nl%3E
> >
> >
> > Nils Breunese said:
> >> Stéphane Mourey wrote:
> >>
> >>> I've install couchdb using yum, so I would like to keep the same
> >>> installation method for the lucene extension. I googled a while, but
> >>> did not find any rpm package available. Is anyone aware of an rpm
> >>> package available somewhere for this? or another extension enabling
> >>> full-text search? or must I proceed with the source? where can I find
> >>> a easy tuto for this on CentOS or Fedora?
> >>
> >> AFAIK there is no RPM package for couchdb-lucene. The instructions on
> >> http://github.com/rnewson/couchdb-lucene should work just fine on
> >> CentOS/Fedora, but like the instructions say you'll need to install
> >> Maven 2 [0] and you may need to install Sun Java [1] (not available in
> >> the default CentOS/Fedora repositories due to license issues) instead of
> >> the CentOS/Fedora gcj or OpenJDK implementations of Java. You could give
> >> the java-1.6.0-openjdk package a try, but the couchdb-lucene site says
> >> it's tested against the Sun version.
> >>
> >> I agree this is all much easier on distributions that do have Sun Java
> >> and Maven 2 packaged in their repositories (like Ubuntu for instance),
> >> but it will work if you just download and install the required pieces.
> >>
> >> Instead of downloading the requirements directly, you could also try the
> >> JPackage repository [2], but last time I installed Sun Java on CentOS 5
> >> I found it way easier to install the RPM from Sun's site directly
> >> instead of trying to build the JPackage nosrc packages.
> >>
> >> Nils.
> >>
> >> [0] http://maven.apache.org/
> >> [1] http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp
> >> [2] http://www.jpackage.org/
> >>
> >> De informatie vervat in deze e-mail en meegezonden bijlagen is
> >> uitsluitend bedoeld voor gebruik door de geadresseerde en kan
> >> vertrouwelijke informatie bevatten. Openbaarmaking, vermenigvuldiging,
> >> verspreiding en/of verstrekking van deze informatie aan derden is
> >> voorbehouden aan geadresseerde. De VPRO staat niet in voor de juiste en
> >> volledige overbrenging van de inhoud van een verzonden e-mail, noch voor
> >> tijdige ontvangst daarvan.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: rpm for lucene extension
Posted by Robert Newson <ro...@gmail.com>.
I'm hoping to ship an .rpm and a .deb for the 0.5 release. I'm away on
business so I haven't made any progress on that yet.
B.
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Markus Jelsma <ma...@buyways.nl> wrote:
> Maven won't work properly using gcj, use Sun Java instead.
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-user/201001.mbox/%3Cvmime.4b5656ca.3080.2defb5e9d48fd3ff@animal.buyways.nl%3E
>
>
> Nils Breunese said:
>> Stéphane Mourey wrote:
>>
>>> I've install couchdb using yum, so I would like to keep the same
>>> installation method for the lucene extension. I googled a while, but
>>> did not find any rpm package available. Is anyone aware of an rpm
>>> package available somewhere for this? or another extension enabling
>>> full-text search? or must I proceed with the source? where can I find
>>> a easy tuto for this on CentOS or Fedora?
>>
>> AFAIK there is no RPM package for couchdb-lucene. The instructions on
>> http://github.com/rnewson/couchdb-lucene should work just fine on
>> CentOS/Fedora, but like the instructions say you'll need to install
>> Maven 2 [0] and you may need to install Sun Java [1] (not available in
>> the default CentOS/Fedora repositories due to license issues) instead of
>> the CentOS/Fedora gcj or OpenJDK implementations of Java. You could give
>> the java-1.6.0-openjdk package a try, but the couchdb-lucene site says
>> it's tested against the Sun version.
>>
>> I agree this is all much easier on distributions that do have Sun Java
>> and Maven 2 packaged in their repositories (like Ubuntu for instance),
>> but it will work if you just download and install the required pieces.
>>
>> Instead of downloading the requirements directly, you could also try the
>> JPackage repository [2], but last time I installed Sun Java on CentOS 5
>> I found it way easier to install the RPM from Sun's site directly
>> instead of trying to build the JPackage nosrc packages.
>>
>> Nils.
>>
>> [0] http://maven.apache.org/
>> [1] http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp
>> [2] http://www.jpackage.org/
>>
>> De informatie vervat in deze e-mail en meegezonden bijlagen is
>> uitsluitend bedoeld voor gebruik door de geadresseerde en kan
>> vertrouwelijke informatie bevatten. Openbaarmaking, vermenigvuldiging,
>> verspreiding en/of verstrekking van deze informatie aan derden is
>> voorbehouden aan geadresseerde. De VPRO staat niet in voor de juiste en
>> volledige overbrenging van de inhoud van een verzonden e-mail, noch voor
>> tijdige ontvangst daarvan.
>
>
>
>
Re: rpm for lucene extension
Posted by Markus Jelsma <ma...@buyways.nl>.
Maven won't work properly using gcj, use Sun Java instead.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-user/201001.mbox/%3Cvmime.4b5656ca.3080.2defb5e9d48fd3ff@animal.buyways.nl%3E
Nils Breunese said:
> Stéphane Mourey wrote:
>
>> I've install couchdb using yum, so I would like to keep the same
>> installation method for the lucene extension. I googled a while, but
>> did not find any rpm package available. Is anyone aware of an rpm
>> package available somewhere for this? or another extension enabling
>> full-text search? or must I proceed with the source? where can I find
>> a easy tuto for this on CentOS or Fedora?
>
> AFAIK there is no RPM package for couchdb-lucene. The instructions on
> http://github.com/rnewson/couchdb-lucene should work just fine on
> CentOS/Fedora, but like the instructions say you'll need to install
> Maven 2 [0] and you may need to install Sun Java [1] (not available in
> the default CentOS/Fedora repositories due to license issues) instead of
> the CentOS/Fedora gcj or OpenJDK implementations of Java. You could give
> the java-1.6.0-openjdk package a try, but the couchdb-lucene site says
> it's tested against the Sun version.
>
> I agree this is all much easier on distributions that do have Sun Java
> and Maven 2 packaged in their repositories (like Ubuntu for instance),
> but it will work if you just download and install the required pieces.
>
> Instead of downloading the requirements directly, you could also try the
> JPackage repository [2], but last time I installed Sun Java on CentOS 5
> I found it way easier to install the RPM from Sun's site directly
> instead of trying to build the JPackage nosrc packages.
>
> Nils.
>
> [0] http://maven.apache.org/
> [1] http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp
> [2] http://www.jpackage.org/
>
> De informatie vervat in deze e-mail en meegezonden bijlagen is
> uitsluitend bedoeld voor gebruik door de geadresseerde en kan
> vertrouwelijke informatie bevatten. Openbaarmaking, vermenigvuldiging,
> verspreiding en/of verstrekking van deze informatie aan derden is
> voorbehouden aan geadresseerde. De VPRO staat niet in voor de juiste en
> volledige overbrenging van de inhoud van een verzonden e-mail, noch voor
> tijdige ontvangst daarvan.
Re: rpm for lucene extension
Posted by Nils Breunese <N....@vpro.nl>.
Stéphane Mourey wrote:
> I've install couchdb using yum, so I would like to keep the same
> installation method for the lucene extension. I googled a while, but
> did not find any rpm package available. Is anyone aware of an rpm
> package available somewhere for this? or another extension enabling
> full-text search? or must I proceed with the source? where can I find
> a easy tuto for this on CentOS or Fedora?
AFAIK there is no RPM package for couchdb-lucene. The instructions on
http://github.com/rnewson/couchdb-lucene should work just fine on
CentOS/Fedora, but like the instructions say you'll need to install
Maven 2 [0] and you may need to install Sun Java [1] (not available in
the default CentOS/Fedora repositories due to license issues) instead of
the CentOS/Fedora gcj or OpenJDK implementations of Java. You could give
the java-1.6.0-openjdk package a try, but the couchdb-lucene site says
it's tested against the Sun version.
I agree this is all much easier on distributions that do have Sun Java
and Maven 2 packaged in their repositories (like Ubuntu for instance),
but it will work if you just download and install the required pieces.
Instead of downloading the requirements directly, you could also try the
JPackage repository [2], but last time I installed Sun Java on CentOS 5
I found it way easier to install the RPM from Sun's site directly
instead of trying to build the JPackage nosrc packages.
Nils.
[0] http://maven.apache.org/
[1] http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp
[2] http://www.jpackage.org/
De informatie vervat in deze e-mail en meegezonden bijlagen is uitsluitend bedoeld voor gebruik door de geadresseerde en kan vertrouwelijke informatie bevatten. Openbaarmaking, vermenigvuldiging, verspreiding en/of verstrekking van deze informatie aan derden is voorbehouden aan geadresseerde. De VPRO staat niet in voor de juiste en volledige overbrenging van de inhoud van een verzonden e-mail, noch voor tijdige ontvangst daarvan.