You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user-zh@flink.apache.org by "chengyanan1008@foxmail.com" <ch...@foxmail.com> on 2020/09/18 06:42:42 UTC
回复: Flink sql 消费kafka的顺序是怎么样的 第二次运行sql的结果和第一次不同
先占个楼
我按照题主给的文档，一边发送数据，一边执行以下SQL实时查看查询结果
select
tumble_start(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE) as wStart,
tumble_end(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE) as wEnd,
count(1) as pv,
count(distinct uuid) as uv
from iservVisit
group by tumble(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE)
最后得到的结果是这样的 ：（跟题主不一样）
wStart wEnd pv uv
2020-09-18T09:14 2020-09-18T09:16 2 2
2020-09-18T09:16 2020-09-18T09:18 8 3
2020-09-18T09:18 2020-09-18T09:20 8 3
2020-09-18T09:20 2020-09-18T09:22 2 2
等所有数据都发送完，退出sql-client然后再执行上边的查询语句最后得到的结果：（跟题主是一样的）：
wStart wEnd pv uv
2020-09-18T09:14 2020-09-18T09:16 2 2
2020-09-18T09:16 2020-09-18T09:18 2 2
2020-09-18T09:18 2020-09-18T09:20 8 3
2020-09-18T09:20 2020-09-18T09:22 2 2
发件人： anonnius
发送时间： 2020-09-18 11:24
收件人： user-zh
主题： Flink sql 消费kafka的顺序是怎么样的 第二次运行sql的结果和第一次不同
hi: [求助] 我这里用flink-sql消费kafka数据, 通过窗口做pvuv的计算, 第一次和第二次计算的结果不一致, 不太了解为什么
0> mac本地环境
1> flink 1.11.1
2> kafka 0.10.2.2, topic为message-json, 分区为3, 副本为1
3> 使用的是sql-client.sh 环境
4> 先在sql-cli中创建了iservVisit表
create table iservVisit (
type string comment '时间类型',
uuid string comment '用户uri',
clientTime string comment '10位时间戳',
rowtime as to_timestamp(from_unixtime(cast(substring(coalesce(clientTime, '0'), 1, 10) as bigint))), -- 计算列, 10位时间戳转为timestamp类型
WATERMARK for rowtime as rowtime - INTERVAL '1' MINUTE -- 计算列, 作为watermark
) with (
'connector' = 'kafka-0.10',
'topic' = 'message-json',
'properties.bootstrap.servers' = 'localhost:9092',
'properties.group.id' = 'consumer-rt',
'format' = 'json',
'json.ignore-parse-errors' = 'true',
'scan.startup.mode' = 'earliest-offset'
)
然后在sql-cli执行sql
select
tumble_start(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE) as wStart,
tumble_end(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE) as wEnd,
count(1) as pv,
count(distinct uuid) as uv
from iservVisit
group by tumble(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE)
5> 向kafka生产者依次发送下面的json消息
{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "c", "clientTime": "1600391684"}
{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1600391663"}
{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1600391690"}
{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "c", "clientTime": "1600391709"}
{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "b", "clientTime": "1600391748"}
{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "c", "clientTime": "1600391782"}
{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "b", "clientTime": "1600391781"}
{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "b", "clientTime": "1600391823"}
{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "b", "clientTime": "1600391822"}
{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1600391815"}
{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1600391857"}
{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1600391870"}
{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "b", "clientTime": "1600391851"}
{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "c", "clientTime": "1600391903"}
{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1600391889"}
{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1600391945"}
{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "b", "clientTime": "1600391938"}
{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "b", "clientTime": "1600391951"}
{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "c", "clientTime": "1600391936"}
{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "b", "clientTime": "1600391970"}
{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "c", "clientTime": "1600392016"}
{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "c", "clientTime": "1600391993"}
{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1600392057"}
{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1800392057"}
6> 第一次结果(这里sql-cli的sql一直在运行)
wStart wEnd pv uv
2020-09-18T09:14 2020-09-18T09:16 5 3
2020-09-18T09:16 2020-09-18T09:18 8 3
2020-09-18T09:18 2020-09-18T09:20 8 3
2020-09-18T09:20 2020-09-18T09:22 2 2
7> 第二次结果(退出[Quit]sql-cli中的sql, 在次运行)
wStart wEnd pv uv
2020-09-18T09:14 2020-09-18T09:16 2 2
2020-09-18T09:16 2020-09-18T09:18 2 2
2020-09-18T09:18 2020-09-18T09:20 8 3
2020-09-18T09:20 2020-09-18T09:22 2 2
8> 详细过程以放入附件文件中
Re: 回复: Flink sql 消费kafka的顺序是怎么样的 第二次运行sql的结果和第一次不同
Posted by 赵一旦 <hi...@gmail.com>.
有人解答下，flink sql情况下的watermark生成是否有datastream api中的多分区取小机制呢？
这个问题datastream api是肯定不存在的。
情况1: 如果10个分区，来10个并发即可，然后在后续跟上watermark生成，本身watermark会合并取小。
情况2: 即使是2个并发，每个并发消费5个分区，但只要利用kafkaSouce提供的watermark生成机制也不会有这个问题。
anonnius <an...@126.com> 于2020年9月18日周五 下午3:47写道：
> hi: 感觉你的关注和回复
> 1> 下面是我的分析过程
> 1. 第一次是, 先在sql-client.sh 中执行sql
> select
> tumble_start(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE) as wStart,
> tumble_end(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE) as wEnd,
> count(1) as pv,
> count(distinct uuid) as uv
> from iservVisit
> group by tumble(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE)
>
> 此时, 由于数据 是一条一条的通过kafka生产者工具(kafka-console-producer.sh)写入,
> 并且由kafka-connector会不停的消费数据, 获取的数据是和手动写入的数据的顺序是一样的
>
> 2. 第二次是, 退出sql-client.sh后在执行sql
> select
> tumble_start(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE) as wStart,
> tumble_end(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE) as wEnd,
> count(1) as pv,
> count(distinct uuid) as uv
> from iservVisit
> group by tumble(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE)
> 这时由于数据已经写入kafka了, 在由kafka-connector进行消费的时候, 由于topic有3个分区, 消费后获取的消息的顺序和
> 手动通过kafka生产者工具(kafka-console-producer.sh)写入时的顺序
> 不一致了, 这样rowtime时间靠后的数据可能先被消费, 导致产生了比较大的watermark, 导致后续消费的部分消息被忽略了
>
> 3. 通过将建表时 watermark的间隔变大些, 能还原第一次的结果, 这种方式还是考虑中(考虑是否一致有效)
> create table iservVisit (
> type string comment '时间类型',
> uuid string comment '用户uri',
> clientTime string comment '10位时间戳',
> rowtime as
> to_timestamp(from_unixtime(cast(substring(coalesce(clientTime, '0'), 1, 10)
> as bigint))), -- 计算列, 10位时间戳转为timestamp类型
> WATERMARK for rowtime as rowtime - INTERVAL '5' MINUTE -- 计算列,
> 作为watermark, 有1分钟变为5分钟
> ) with (
> 'connector' = 'kafka-0.10',
> 'topic' = 'message-json',
> 'properties.bootstrap.servers' = 'localhost:9092',
> 'properties.group.id' = 'consumer-rt',
> 'format' = 'json',
> 'json.ignore-parse-errors' = 'true',
> 'scan.startup.mode' = 'earliest-offset'
> )
> 4. 初步结论是: 如何保证/或通过什么办法, 让每个分区的消费数据的速度保持一致
> 5. 附件可以通过sublime sql/hql插件查看, 这样显示会清晰点
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 在 2020-09-18 14:42:42，"chengyanan1008@foxmail.com" <ch...@foxmail.com> 写道：
> >先占个楼
> >我按照题主给的文档，一边发送数据，一边执行以下SQL实时查看查询结果
> >select
> > tumble_start(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE) as wStart,
> > tumble_end(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE) as wEnd,
> > count(1) as pv,
> > count(distinct uuid) as uv
> >from iservVisit
> >group by tumble(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE)
> >最后得到的结果是这样的 ：（跟题主不一样）
> >
> > wStart wEnd pv uv
> > 2020-09-18T09:14 2020-09-18T09:16 2 2
> > 2020-09-18T09:16 2020-09-18T09:18 8 3
> > 2020-09-18T09:18 2020-09-18T09:20 8 3
> > 2020-09-18T09:20 2020-09-18T09:22 2 2
> >
> >等所有数据都发送完，退出sql-client然后再执行上边的查询语句最后得到的结果：（跟题主是一样的）：
> >wStart wEnd pv uv
> >2020-09-18T09:14 2020-09-18T09:16 2 2
> >2020-09-18T09:16 2020-09-18T09:18 2 2
> >2020-09-18T09:18 2020-09-18T09:20 8 3
> >2020-09-18T09:20 2020-09-18T09:22 2 2
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >发件人： anonnius
> >发送时间： 2020-09-18 11:24
> >收件人： user-zh
> >主题： Flink sql 消费kafka的顺序是怎么样的 第二次运行sql的结果和第一次不同
> >hi: [求助] 我这里用flink-sql消费kafka数据, 通过窗口做pvuv的计算, 第一次和第二次计算的结果不一致, 不太了解为什么
> >0> mac本地环境
> >1> flink 1.11.1
> >2> kafka 0.10.2.2, topic为message-json, 分区为3, 副本为1
> >3> 使用的是sql-client.sh 环境
> >4> 先在sql-cli中创建了iservVisit表
> >create table iservVisit (
> > type string comment '时间类型',
> > uuid string comment '用户uri',
> > clientTime string comment '10位时间戳',
> > rowtime as to_timestamp(from_unixtime(cast(substring(coalesce(clientTime, '0'), 1, 10) as bigint))), -- 计算列, 10位时间戳转为timestamp类型
> > WATERMARK for rowtime as rowtime - INTERVAL '1' MINUTE -- 计算列, 作为watermark
> >) with (
> > 'connector' = 'kafka-0.10',
> > 'topic' = 'message-json',
> > 'properties.bootstrap.servers' = 'localhost:9092',
> > 'properties.group.id' = 'consumer-rt',
> > 'format' = 'json',
> > 'json.ignore-parse-errors' = 'true',
> > 'scan.startup.mode' = 'earliest-offset'
> >)
> >然后在sql-cli执行sql
> >select
> > tumble_start(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE) as wStart,
> > tumble_end(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE) as wEnd,
> > count(1) as pv,
> > count(distinct uuid) as uv
> >from iservVisit
> >group by tumble(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE)
> >5> 向kafka生产者依次发送下面的json消息
> >{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "c", "clientTime": "1600391684"}
> >{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1600391663"}
> >{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1600391690"}
> >{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "c", "clientTime": "1600391709"}
> >{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "b", "clientTime": "1600391748"}
> >{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "c", "clientTime": "1600391782"}
> >{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "b", "clientTime": "1600391781"}
> >{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "b", "clientTime": "1600391823"}
> >{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "b", "clientTime": "1600391822"}
> >{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1600391815"}
> >{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1600391857"}
> >{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1600391870"}
> >{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "b", "clientTime": "1600391851"}
> >{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "c", "clientTime": "1600391903"}
> >{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1600391889"}
> >{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1600391945"}
> >{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "b", "clientTime": "1600391938"}
> >{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "b", "clientTime": "1600391951"}
> >{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "c", "clientTime": "1600391936"}
> >{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "b", "clientTime": "1600391970"}
> >{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "c", "clientTime": "1600392016"}
> >{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "c", "clientTime": "1600391993"}
> >{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1600392057"}
> >{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1800392057"}
> >6> 第一次结果(这里sql-cli的sql一直在运行)
> > wStart wEnd pv uv
> >2020-09-18T09:14 2020-09-18T09:16 5 3
> >2020-09-18T09:16 2020-09-18T09:18 8 3
> >2020-09-18T09:18 2020-09-18T09:20 8 3
> >2020-09-18T09:20 2020-09-18T09:22 2 2
> >7> 第二次结果(退出[Quit]sql-cli中的sql, 在次运行)
> >wStart wEnd pv uv
> >2020-09-18T09:14 2020-09-18T09:16 2 2
> >2020-09-18T09:16 2020-09-18T09:18 2 2
> >2020-09-18T09:18 2020-09-18T09:20 8 3
> >2020-09-18T09:20 2020-09-18T09:22 2 2
> >8> 详细过程以放入附件文件中
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re:回复: Flink sql 消费kafka的顺序是怎么样的 第二次运行sql的结果和第一次不同
Posted by anonnius <an...@126.com>.
hi: 感觉你的关注和回复
1> 下面是我的分析过程
1. 第一次是, 先在sql-client.sh 中执行sql
select
tumble_start(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE) as wStart,
tumble_end(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE) as wEnd,
count(1) as pv,
count(distinct uuid) as uv
from iservVisit
group by tumble(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE)
此时, 由于数据 是一条一条的通过kafka生产者工具(kafka-console-producer.sh)写入, 并且由kafka-connector会不停的消费数据, 获取的数据是和手动写入的数据的顺序是一样的
2. 第二次是, 退出sql-client.sh后在执行sql
select
tumble_start(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE) as wStart,
tumble_end(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE) as wEnd,
count(1) as pv,
count(distinct uuid) as uv
from iservVisit
group by tumble(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE)
这时由于数据已经写入kafka了, 在由kafka-connector进行消费的时候, 由于topic有3个分区, 消费后获取的消息的顺序和 手动通过kafka生产者工具(kafka-console-producer.sh)写入时的顺序
不一致了, 这样rowtime时间靠后的数据可能先被消费, 导致产生了比较大的watermark, 导致后续消费的部分消息被忽略了
3. 通过将建表时 watermark的间隔变大些, 能还原第一次的结果, 这种方式还是考虑中(考虑是否一致有效)
create table iservVisit (
type string comment '时间类型',
uuid string comment '用户uri',
clientTime string comment '10位时间戳',
rowtime as to_timestamp(from_unixtime(cast(substring(coalesce(clientTime, '0'), 1, 10) as bigint))), -- 计算列, 10位时间戳转为timestamp类型
WATERMARK for rowtime as rowtime - INTERVAL '5' MINUTE -- 计算列, 作为watermark, 有1分钟变为5分钟
) with (
'connector' = 'kafka-0.10',
'topic' = 'message-json',
'properties.bootstrap.servers' = 'localhost:9092',
'properties.group.id' = 'consumer-rt',
'format' = 'json',
'json.ignore-parse-errors' = 'true',
'scan.startup.mode' = 'earliest-offset'
)
4. 初步结论是: 如何保证/或通过什么办法, 让每个分区的消费数据的速度保持一致
5. 附件可以通过sublime sql/hql插件查看, 这样显示会清晰点
在 2020-09-18 14:42:42，"chengyanan1008@foxmail.com" <ch...@foxmail.com> 写道：
>先占个楼
>我按照题主给的文档，一边发送数据，一边执行以下SQL实时查看查询结果
>select
> tumble_start(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE) as wStart,
> tumble_end(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE) as wEnd,
> count(1) as pv,
> count(distinct uuid) as uv
>from iservVisit
>group by tumble(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE)
>最后得到的结果是这样的 ：（跟题主不一样）
>
> wStart wEnd pv uv
> 2020-09-18T09:14 2020-09-18T09:16 2 2
> 2020-09-18T09:16 2020-09-18T09:18 8 3
> 2020-09-18T09:18 2020-09-18T09:20 8 3
> 2020-09-18T09:20 2020-09-18T09:22 2 2
>
>等所有数据都发送完，退出sql-client然后再执行上边的查询语句最后得到的结果：（跟题主是一样的）：
>wStart wEnd pv uv
>2020-09-18T09:14 2020-09-18T09:16 2 2
>2020-09-18T09:16 2020-09-18T09:18 2 2
>2020-09-18T09:18 2020-09-18T09:20 8 3
>2020-09-18T09:20 2020-09-18T09:22 2 2
>
>
>
>
>发件人： anonnius
>发送时间： 2020-09-18 11:24
>收件人： user-zh
>主题： Flink sql 消费kafka的顺序是怎么样的 第二次运行sql的结果和第一次不同
>hi: [求助] 我这里用flink-sql消费kafka数据, 通过窗口做pvuv的计算, 第一次和第二次计算的结果不一致, 不太了解为什么
>0> mac本地环境
>1> flink 1.11.1
>2> kafka 0.10.2.2, topic为message-json, 分区为3, 副本为1
>3> 使用的是sql-client.sh 环境
>4> 先在sql-cli中创建了iservVisit表
>create table iservVisit (
> type string comment '时间类型',
> uuid string comment '用户uri',
> clientTime string comment '10位时间戳',
> rowtime as to_timestamp(from_unixtime(cast(substring(coalesce(clientTime, '0'), 1, 10) as bigint))), -- 计算列, 10位时间戳转为timestamp类型
> WATERMARK for rowtime as rowtime - INTERVAL '1' MINUTE -- 计算列, 作为watermark
>) with (
> 'connector' = 'kafka-0.10',
> 'topic' = 'message-json',
> 'properties.bootstrap.servers' = 'localhost:9092',
> 'properties.group.id' = 'consumer-rt',
> 'format' = 'json',
> 'json.ignore-parse-errors' = 'true',
> 'scan.startup.mode' = 'earliest-offset'
>)
>然后在sql-cli执行sql
>select
> tumble_start(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE) as wStart,
> tumble_end(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE) as wEnd,
> count(1) as pv,
> count(distinct uuid) as uv
>from iservVisit
>group by tumble(rowtime, interval '2' MINUTE)
>5> 向kafka生产者依次发送下面的json消息
>{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "c", "clientTime": "1600391684"}
>{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1600391663"}
>{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1600391690"}
>{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "c", "clientTime": "1600391709"}
>{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "b", "clientTime": "1600391748"}
>{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "c", "clientTime": "1600391782"}
>{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "b", "clientTime": "1600391781"}
>{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "b", "clientTime": "1600391823"}
>{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "b", "clientTime": "1600391822"}
>{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1600391815"}
>{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1600391857"}
>{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1600391870"}
>{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "b", "clientTime": "1600391851"}
>{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "c", "clientTime": "1600391903"}
>{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1600391889"}
>{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1600391945"}
>{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "b", "clientTime": "1600391938"}
>{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "b", "clientTime": "1600391951"}
>{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "c", "clientTime": "1600391936"}
>{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "b", "clientTime": "1600391970"}
>{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "c", "clientTime": "1600392016"}
>{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "c", "clientTime": "1600391993"}
>{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1600392057"}
>{"type": "iservVisit", "uuid": "a", "clientTime": "1800392057"}
>6> 第一次结果(这里sql-cli的sql一直在运行)
> wStart wEnd pv uv
>2020-09-18T09:14 2020-09-18T09:16 5 3
>2020-09-18T09:16 2020-09-18T09:18 8 3
>2020-09-18T09:18 2020-09-18T09:20 8 3
>2020-09-18T09:20 2020-09-18T09:22 2 2
>7> 第二次结果(退出[Quit]sql-cli中的sql, 在次运行)
>wStart wEnd pv uv
>2020-09-18T09:14 2020-09-18T09:16 2 2
>2020-09-18T09:16 2020-09-18T09:18 2 2
>2020-09-18T09:18 2020-09-18T09:20 8 3
>2020-09-18T09:20 2020-09-18T09:22 2 2
>8> 详细过程以放入附件文件中
>
>
>
>
>
>