You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Alexander Menshikov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/06/06 17:08:18 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-4908) Ignite.reentrantLock looks much
slower than IgniteCache.lock.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16039269#comment-16039269 ]
Alexander Menshikov commented on IGNITE-4908:
---------------------------------------------
[~amashenkov]
ReentrantLock has two hot points:
1) GridCacheLockImpl.Sync#compareAndSetGlobalState() for lock operation.
2) GridCacheLockImpl.Sync#setGlobalState() for unlock operation.
In both methods, there are two hottest lines:
1) GridCacheLockState val = lockView.get(key);
2) tx.commit();
So do you want to cache GridCacheLockState somehow?
> Ignite.reentrantLock looks much slower than IgniteCache.lock.
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-4908
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4908
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: data structures
> Affects Versions: 1.8
> Reporter: Andrew Mashenkov
> Assignee: Alexander Menshikov
> Fix For: 2.1
>
>
> We should make a benchmark and investigate this issue.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)