You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by David Blevins <da...@visi.com> on 2006/12/12 00:24:54 UTC
Re: Releasing 2.2
So are we ready to go?
I will create a build and put it up do a vote tomorrow unless anyone
has any remaining items.
-David
Re: Releasing 2.2
Posted by Gianny Damour <gi...@optusnet.com.au>.
On 13/12/2006, at 9:46 AM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Dec 12, 2006, at 1:58 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
>> DayTrader checks out in Direct, SLSB and EJB mode thanks to
>> Gianny. We have to verify JPA mode but its most likely
>> configuration.
>>
>> I've released:
>>
>> TranQL-Parent 1.0
>> TranQL-Connector 1.3
>> TranQL-Connector-Derby-* 1.2
>>
>> I'm waiting on tranql itself as gianny was going to take a look at
>> prefetch. David, we could probably branch tranql also and provide
>> 1.4.1 in Geronimo if you need that.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> That last "possibly TranQL" fix turned out to be an OpenEJB fix, so
> it sounds iffy. Gianny any thoughts?
I just changed the default prefetch behavior in TranQL and this
addresses Matt's concerns. I believe that we should cut a TranQL
version now. If the TCK is broken due to this last minute change,
then I think we should re-cut a TranQL release based on the previous
SVN revision.
Thanks,
Gianny
>
> Matt, when do you expect to cut 2.0 M1?
>
> -David
Re: Releasing 2.2
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On Dec 12, 2006, at 1:58 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> DayTrader checks out in Direct, SLSB and EJB mode thanks to
> Gianny. We have to verify JPA mode but its most likely configuration.
>
> I've released:
>
> TranQL-Parent 1.0
> TranQL-Connector 1.3
> TranQL-Connector-Derby-* 1.2
>
> I'm waiting on tranql itself as gianny was going to take a look at
> prefetch. David, we could probably branch tranql also and provide
> 1.4.1 in Geronimo if you need that.
>
> Thoughts?
That last "possibly TranQL" fix turned out to be an OpenEJB fix, so
it sounds iffy. Gianny any thoughts?
Matt, when do you expect to cut 2.0 M1?
-David
> On Dec 12, 2006, at 12:28 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>> On Dec 11, 2006, at 3:24 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>
>>> So are we ready to go?
>>>
>>> I will create a build and put it up do a vote tomorrow unless
>>> anyone has any remaining items.
>>
>> We have one last fix in from Gianny. Matt is testing it now.
>> When we verify that it's all good, I'll start the process of
>> releasing 2.2
>>
>> GERONIMO-2649: Insert of new EJB does not appear to be occurring
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>
> Matt Hogstrom
> matt@hogstrom.org
>
>
Re: Releasing 2.2
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
Alright, we have a build for Yoko and Matt just published a new new
Tranql release that works (1.4.1)....
I've got everything building fine now with final versions, etc. so
I'll tag and post binaries shortly.
-David
Re: Releasing 2.2
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
On Dec 12, 2006, at 10:06 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2006, at 1:58 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
>> I'm waiting on tranql itself as gianny was going to take a look at
>> prefetch.
>
> Ok. Talked with Matt on irc and he's going to release TranQL
> proper tomorrow if nothing comes in on the prefetch side of things.
>
> That'd give us just one last snapshot, yoko. Rick, is it possible
> that you could cook up a svn-revisioned yoko build that we could
> use in openejb 2.2, geronimo 1.2beta, and geronimo 2.0m1?
Just to follow up... Rick posted a request to the yoko list and they
are going to create the svn revisioned release!
-dain
Re: Releasing 2.2
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On Dec 12, 2006, at 1:58 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> I'm waiting on tranql itself as gianny was going to take a look at
> prefetch.
Ok. Talked with Matt on irc and he's going to release TranQL proper
tomorrow if nothing comes in on the prefetch side of things.
That'd give us just one last snapshot, yoko. Rick, is it possible
that you could cook up a svn-revisioned yoko build that we could use
in openejb 2.2, geronimo 1.2beta, and geronimo 2.0m1?
-David
>
> On Dec 12, 2006, at 12:28 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>> On Dec 11, 2006, at 3:24 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>
>>> So are we ready to go?
>>>
>>> I will create a build and put it up do a vote tomorrow unless
>>> anyone has any remaining items.
>>
>> We have one last fix in from Gianny. Matt is testing it now.
>> When we verify that it's all good, I'll start the process of
>> releasing 2.2
>>
>> GERONIMO-2649: Insert of new EJB does not appear to be occurring
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>
> Matt Hogstrom
> matt@hogstrom.org
>
>
Re: Releasing 2.2
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
DayTrader checks out in Direct, SLSB and EJB mode thanks to Gianny.
We have to verify JPA mode but its most likely configuration.
I've released:
TranQL-Parent 1.0
TranQL-Connector 1.3
TranQL-Connector-Derby-* 1.2
I'm waiting on tranql itself as gianny was going to take a look at
prefetch. David, we could probably branch tranql also and provide
1.4.1 in Geronimo if you need that.
Thoughts?
On Dec 12, 2006, at 12:28 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2006, at 3:24 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>> So are we ready to go?
>>
>> I will create a build and put it up do a vote tomorrow unless
>> anyone has any remaining items.
>
> We have one last fix in from Gianny. Matt is testing it now. When
> we verify that it's all good, I'll start the process of releasing 2.2
>
> GERONIMO-2649: Insert of new EJB does not appear to be occurring
>
> -David
>
>
Matt Hogstrom
matt@hogstrom.org
Re: Releasing 2.2
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Dec 12, 2006, at 12:28 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2006, at 3:24 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>> So are we ready to go?
>>
>> I will create a build and put it up do a vote tomorrow unless
>> anyone has any remaining items.
>
> We have one last fix in from Gianny. Matt is testing it now. When
> we verify that it's all good, I'll start the process of releasing 2.2
>
> GERONIMO-2649: Insert of new EJB does not appear to be occurring
Sounds good. Things look good to me...
--kevan
Re: Releasing 2.2
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On Dec 11, 2006, at 3:24 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> So are we ready to go?
>
> I will create a build and put it up do a vote tomorrow unless
> anyone has any remaining items.
We have one last fix in from Gianny. Matt is testing it now. When
we verify that it's all good, I'll start the process of releasing 2.2
GERONIMO-2649: Insert of new EJB does not appear to be occurring
-David