You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jira@kafka.apache.org by "John Roesler (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/07/08 18:12:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-8478) Poll for more records before forced processing

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

John Roesler updated KAFKA-8478:
--------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 3.0.0

> Poll for more records before forced processing
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-8478
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8478
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: streams
>            Reporter: John Roesler
>            Assignee: John Roesler
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>
> While analyzing the algorithm of Streams's poll/process loop, I noticed the following:
> The algorithm of runOnce is:
> {code}
> loop0:
>   long poll for records (100ms)
>   loop1:
>     loop2: for BATCH_SIZE iterations:
>       process one record in each task that has data enqueued
>     adjust BATCH_SIZE
>     if loop2 processed any records, repeat loop 1
>     else, break loop1 and repeat loop0
> {code}
> There's potentially an unwanted interaction between "keep processing as long as any record is processed" and forcing processing after `max.task.idle.ms`.
> If there are two tasks, A and B, and A runs out of records on one input before B, then B could keep the processing loop running, and hence prevent A from getting any new records, until max.task.idle.ms expires, at which point A will force processing on its other input partition. The intent of idling is to at least give A a chance of getting more records on the empty input, but under this situation, we'd never even check for more records before forcing processing.
> I'm thinking we should only enforce processing if there was a completed poll since we noticed the task was missing inputs (otherwise, we may as well not bother idling at all).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)