[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-926) Prefer neutron security groups if available

["Zack Shoylev (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-926?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14577113#comment-14577113 ] 

Zack Shoylev commented on JCLOUDS-926:
--------------------------------------

This will be the way to go forward (by defaulting to the neutron way of doing security groups). However, there are some difficulties:
1. neutron and neutron security groups (extension) need to be supported on the provider
2. Network, subnet, port, security group, and rules (if needed) have to be created using settings that will work with the provider
3. The port has to be attached to the VM using the nova os-interface extension.


> Prefer neutron security groups if available
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCLOUDS-926
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-926
>             Project: jclouds
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: jclouds-compute
>            Reporter: Andrea Turli
>            Assignee: Zack Shoylev
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> Openstack Neutron has more features than nova security group extension and they will be soon the recommended implementation, I think.
> jclouds/openstack-nova uses nova security_group extension by default https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/blob/master/apis/openstack-nova/src/main/java/org/jclouds/openstack/nova/v2_0/compute/strategy/ApplyNovaTemplateOptionsCreateNodesWithGroupEncodedIntoNameThenAddToSet.java#L127
> Maybe the default should be overridable so to plug the Neutron security_groups extensions if available or something similar.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)