You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Andrew Kyle Purtell (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/06/09 16:57:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-24367) ScheduledChore log elapsed timespan
in a human-friendly format
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Andrew Kyle Purtell updated HBASE-24367:
----------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.3.0)
1.7.0
2.3.3
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
> ScheduledChore log elapsed timespan in a human-friendly format
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-24367
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24367
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: master, regionserver
> Affects Versions: 2.3.0
> Reporter: Nick Dimiduk
> Assignee: Andrew Kyle Purtell
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-1, 2.3.3, 1.7.0, 2.4.0, 2.2.6
>
>
> I noticed this in a log line,
> {noformat}
> 2020-04-23 18:31:14,183 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ScheduledChore: host-a.example.com,16000,1587577999888-ClusterStatusChore average execution time: 68488258 ns.
> {noformat}
> I'm not sure if there's a case when elapsed time in nanoseconds is meaningful for these background chores, but we could do a little work before printing the number and time unit to truncate precision down to something a little more intuitive for operators. This number purports to be an average, so a high level of precision isn't necessarily meaningful.
> Separately, or while we're here, if we think an operator really cares about the performance of this chore, we should print a histogram of elapsed times, rather than an opaque average.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)