Re: what is svn 2.0?

["C. Michael Pilato" <cm...@collab.net>]

Martin Tomes wrote:
> One feature which would require database changes is knowing where
> something has been copied to. Our users really miss the ability to look
> at the history of a file and see where it was branched and tagged. This
> alone would make us upgrade to 2.0.

Yes, certainly in BDB we would need to change the schema.  But I don't think
a full dump-and-load would be required.  We'd simply need to build once (and
maintain going forward) a successors index.  Probably easiest to provide a
custom migration script rather than asking folks to dump and load.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cm...@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand