You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2011/06/19 23:27:57 UTC
buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-branch9
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-branch9 while building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-branch9/builds/125
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/branches/release09.04] 1137442
Blamelist: jleroux
BUILD FAILED: failed compile
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-branch9
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> It was a bit late and I did not run the (automated) tests. I should have remember that Hans introduced this feature after R9.04.
Actually looking at it closer, it was correct in R9.04, and has been faulty since
Jacques
> It's reverted and the demo is now running again
>
> Jacques
>
> Scott Gray wrote:
>> Back porting without testing is still something we think is okay?
>>
>> Regards
>> Scott
>>
>> On 20/06/2011, at 9:27 AM, buildbot@apache.org wrote:
>>
>>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-branch9 while building ASF Buildbot.
>>> Full details are available at:
>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-branch9/builds/125
>>>
>>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
>>>
>>> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
>>>
>>> Build Reason: scheduler
>>> Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/branches/release09.04] 1137442
>>> Blamelist: jleroux
>>>
>>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile
>>>
>>> sincerely,
>>> -The Buildbot
>
> Hi Scott,
>
> It was a bit late and I did not run the tests. I should have remember that Hans introduced this feature after R9.04
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-branch9
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Hi Scott,
It was a bit late and I did not run the (automated) tests. I should have remember that Hans introduced this feature after R9.04.
It's reverted and the demo is now running again
Jacques
Scott Gray wrote:
> Back porting without testing is still something we think is okay?
>
> Regards
> Scott
>
> On 20/06/2011, at 9:27 AM, buildbot@apache.org wrote:
>
>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-branch9 while building ASF Buildbot.
>> Full details are available at:
>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-branch9/builds/125
>>
>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
>>
>> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
>>
>> Build Reason: scheduler
>> Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/branches/release09.04] 1137442
>> Blamelist: jleroux
>>
>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile
>>
>> sincerely,
>> -The Buildbot
Hi Scott,
It was a bit late and I did not run the tests. I should have remember that Hans introduced this feature after R9.04
Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-branch9
Posted by Scott Gray <sc...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
Back porting without testing is still something we think is okay?
Regards
Scott
On 20/06/2011, at 9:27 AM, buildbot@apache.org wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-branch9 while building ASF Buildbot.
> Full details are available at:
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-branch9/builds/125
>
> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
>
> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
>
> Build Reason: scheduler
> Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/branches/release09.04] 1137442
> Blamelist: jleroux
>
> BUILD FAILED: failed compile
>
> sincerely,
> -The Buildbot
>