You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@avro.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/06/03 05:33:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (AVRO-3527) Generated equals() and hashCode() for SpecificRecords

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-3527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated AVRO-3527:
---------------------------------
    Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Generated equals() and hashCode() for SpecificRecords
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AVRO-3527
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-3527
>             Project: Apache Avro
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: java
>            Reporter: Steven Aerts
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>         Attachments: equals_hashcode_after.txt, equals_hashcode_before.txt, flame_graph.jpeg
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> When profiling our production system, we found that it was spending almost 40% of its overall time in the {{SpecificRecordBase.hashCode()}} and {{SpecificRecordBase.equals()}} implementations.
> In some sections of its logic we see that almost all time is spend in those function, as can be seen in attached flame graph  (blue "pyramids")
> !flame_graph.jpeg|width=385,height=99!
> By generating the {{.equals()}} and {{.hashCode()}} all this overhead disappeared and this application became 35% faster overall. 
> Also on other AVRO heavy applications we saw noticeable performance gains where we hadn't expect them due to this improvement.
> A generated implementation of {{.hashCode()}} becomes 5 to 10 times faster than its generic counterpart. For {{.equals()}} it is 10 to 20 times faster.
> Which is also visible in the attached JMH benchmarks.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)