You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Joerg Heinicke <jh...@virbus.de> on 2003/09/13 12:49:17 UTC

Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/deprecated/java/org/apache/cocoon/components/xpath JaxenProcessorImpl.java XPathProcessor.java XPathProcessorImpl.java

Can we also remove JDOM completely? I didn't see any relation to the 
Cocoon project and could exclude it from build without any problems with 
compiling.

But I have no Cocoon at the moment after my Computer crashed (as it did 
more often in the last weeks), NTFS got broken and Windows didn't want 
to reboot.

Joerg

vgritsenko@apache.org wrote:
> vgritsenko    2003/09/11 16:53:51
> 
>   Modified:    .        gump.xml status.xml
>                lib      jars.xml
>   Removed:     lib/optional jaxen-core-1.0-FCS.jar jaxen-dom-1.0-FCS.jar
>                         saxpath-1.0-FCS.jar
>                src/deprecated/java/org/apache/cocoon/components/xpath
>                         JaxenProcessorImpl.java XPathProcessor.java
>                         XPathProcessorImpl.java
>   Log:
>   Remove xpath processor component and all implementations.
>   Remove jaxen libraries.

Re: Portal dependency on JDOM is overrated?

Posted by Guido Casper <gc...@s-und-n.de>.
Joerg Heinicke <jh...@virbus.de> wrote:
> Carsten is in holidays for three weeks, but maybe one of the other S&N
> people knows (Matthew, Guido)?? Was it planned to replace W3C DOM with
> JDOM or the other way around?

I'm not familiar with the portal code and don't know of any planned
refactoring. I'd say if JDOM isn't used, remove it. I'll take Carsten's
rage ;-)

Guido

(Maybe one of the BASF people know more, Volker?)

>
> Joerg
>
> Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
>> Couple of portal files:
>>
>>
cocoon-2.1\src\blocks\portal\java\org\apache\cocoon\portal\application\P
ortalApplicationConfig.java
>>
>>
>>
cocoon-2.1\src\blocks\portal\java\org\apache\cocoon\portal\application\P
ortalApplicationConfigFactory.java
>>
>> excplicitly mention JDOM in theirs Javadoc. But anywhere in code they
>> require JDOM, just good'ol w3c DOM. I presume that this is it a bug
>> in
>> Javadoc which can easily be fixed?
>>
>>
>>
>> Joerg Heinicke wrote:
>>
>>> Can we also remove JDOM completely? I didn't see any relation to the
>>> Cocoon project and could exclude it from build without any problems
>>> with compiling.
>>
>>
>>
>> Sure. Let's clear up this above issue, and then I'll remove jdom too.
>>
>> Vadim

Re: Portal dependency on JDOM is overrated?

Posted by Joerg Heinicke <jh...@virbus.de>.
Carsten is in holidays for three weeks, but maybe one of the other S&N 
people knows (Matthew, Guido)?? Was it planned to replace W3C DOM with 
JDOM or the other way around?

Joerg

Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> Couple of portal files:
>  
> cocoon-2.1\src\blocks\portal\java\org\apache\cocoon\portal\application\PortalApplicationConfig.java 
> 
>  
> cocoon-2.1\src\blocks\portal\java\org\apache\cocoon\portal\application\PortalApplicationConfigFactory.java 
> 
> excplicitly mention JDOM in theirs Javadoc. But anywhere in code they 
> require JDOM, just good'ol w3c DOM. I presume that this is it a bug in 
> Javadoc which can easily be fixed?
> 
> 
> 
> Joerg Heinicke wrote:
> 
>> Can we also remove JDOM completely? I didn't see any relation to the 
>> Cocoon project and could exclude it from build without any problems 
>> with compiling.
> 
> 
> 
> Sure. Let's clear up this above issue, and then I'll remove jdom too.
> 
> Vadim

Portal dependency on JDOM is overrated?

Posted by Vadim Gritsenko <va...@verizon.net>.
Couple of portal files:
  
cocoon-2.1\src\blocks\portal\java\org\apache\cocoon\portal\application\PortalApplicationConfig.java
  
cocoon-2.1\src\blocks\portal\java\org\apache\cocoon\portal\application\PortalApplicationConfigFactory.java
excplicitly mention JDOM in theirs Javadoc. But anywhere in code they 
require JDOM, just good'ol w3c DOM. I presume that this is it a bug in 
Javadoc which can easily be fixed?



Joerg Heinicke wrote:

> Can we also remove JDOM completely? I didn't see any relation to the 
> Cocoon project and could exclude it from build without any problems 
> with compiling.


Sure. Let's clear up this above issue, and then I'll remove jdom too.

Vadim