You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@solr.apache.org by Michael Gibney <mi...@michaelgibney.net> on 2022/12/22 14:44:33 UTC
Solr 9.1.1 bugfix release
I'd like to get the ball rolling on a 9.1.1 bugfix release, and
volunteer to be release manager. There aren't very many bugfixes
accumulated since 9.1.0 on `branch_9_1`, but SOLR-16585 in particular
(NPE on MatchAllDocs pagination) should be fixed asap.
I'm thinking to build a release candidate as early as possible in the new year.
Are there any outstanding bugfixes that anyone would like to backport
to `branch_9_1` before preparing the release?
Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
Re: Solr 9.1.1 bugfix release
Posted by Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ic...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for volunteering, Michael.
On Thu, 22 Dec, 2022, 8:14 pm Michael Gibney, <mi...@michaelgibney.net>
wrote:
> I'd like to get the ball rolling on a 9.1.1 bugfix release, and
> volunteer to be release manager. There aren't very many bugfixes
> accumulated since 9.1.0 on `branch_9_1`, but SOLR-16585 in particular
> (NPE on MatchAllDocs pagination) should be fixed asap.
>
> I'm thinking to build a release candidate as early as possible in the new
> year.
>
> Are there any outstanding bugfixes that anyone would like to backport
> to `branch_9_1` before preparing the release?
>
> Michael
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>
>
Re: Solr 9.1.1 bugfix release
Posted by Michael Gibney <mi...@michaelgibney.net>.
Thanks! Agreed wrt 9.2 soon w/ Lucene upgrade; but to be explicit: the
SlotAcc deadlock in particular can be addressed in 9.1.1 (by
backporting SOLR-16165). The analyzer SPI deadlock (requires Lucene
9.4) is separate.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 11:02 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
<ic...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The slot accumulator deadlocks make a good case for doing a 9.2 soon
> (with the Lucene upgrade).
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 9:30 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> <ic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1 to SOLR-16165.
> > Let's not do a Lucene upgrade in a bugfix release.
> >
> > I have some pending steps from the post release of 9.1, I'll complete
> > them in another 48-72 hours. Sorry about the delay.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 9:16 PM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1. Don't add a Lucene upgrade though :-)
> > >
> > > ~ David Smiley
> > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 10:05 AM Michael Gibney <mi...@michaelgibney.net>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Wondering what folks think of backporting some classloading
> > > > deadlock-related fixes:
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16165
> > > > and possibly upgrade to Lucene 9.4
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16442
> > > > particularly considering:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11718
> > > >
> > > > The main concerns for all the above are classloading issues. The first
> > > > one (SlotAcc) I think should be backported, since we know it has
> > > > manifested in the wild and it's a very self-contained fix.
> > > >
> > > > I gather based on SOLR-15254 that the deadlock that would be fixed by
> > > > Lucene 9.4 upgrade has also manifested; in fact I'm surprised that we
> > > > haven't seen this issue manifesting more frequently -- maybe it has,
> > > > but it doesn't get reported/diagnosed because it's an issue that's
> > > > mostly likely to manifest on startup (when actual people are likely to
> > > > be paying attention), and is easily "fixed" in the short-term by
> > > > restarting (again)?. There's some discussion at:
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16167
> > > > and
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15254
> > > >
> > > > I wouldn't want to do anything that would substantially delay 9.1.1
> > > > though...
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 6:17 PM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Still looking for a PR approval for the protobuf upgrade:
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1252
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
Re: Solr 9.1.1 bugfix release
Posted by Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ic...@gmail.com>.
The slot accumulator deadlocks make a good case for doing a 9.2 soon
(with the Lucene upgrade).
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 9:30 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
<ic...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 to SOLR-16165.
> Let's not do a Lucene upgrade in a bugfix release.
>
> I have some pending steps from the post release of 9.1, I'll complete
> them in another 48-72 hours. Sorry about the delay.
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 9:16 PM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > +1. Don't add a Lucene upgrade though :-)
> >
> > ~ David Smiley
> > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 10:05 AM Michael Gibney <mi...@michaelgibney.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Wondering what folks think of backporting some classloading
> > > deadlock-related fixes:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16165
> > > and possibly upgrade to Lucene 9.4
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16442
> > > particularly considering:
> > > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11718
> > >
> > > The main concerns for all the above are classloading issues. The first
> > > one (SlotAcc) I think should be backported, since we know it has
> > > manifested in the wild and it's a very self-contained fix.
> > >
> > > I gather based on SOLR-15254 that the deadlock that would be fixed by
> > > Lucene 9.4 upgrade has also manifested; in fact I'm surprised that we
> > > haven't seen this issue manifesting more frequently -- maybe it has,
> > > but it doesn't get reported/diagnosed because it's an issue that's
> > > mostly likely to manifest on startup (when actual people are likely to
> > > be paying attention), and is easily "fixed" in the short-term by
> > > restarting (again)?. There's some discussion at:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16167
> > > and
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15254
> > >
> > > I wouldn't want to do anything that would substantially delay 9.1.1
> > > though...
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 6:17 PM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Still looking for a PR approval for the protobuf upgrade:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1252
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > >
> > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
Re: Solr 9.1.1 bugfix release
Posted by Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ic...@gmail.com>.
+1 to SOLR-16165.
Let's not do a Lucene upgrade in a bugfix release.
I have some pending steps from the post release of 9.1, I'll complete
them in another 48-72 hours. Sorry about the delay.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 9:16 PM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1. Don't add a Lucene upgrade though :-)
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 10:05 AM Michael Gibney <mi...@michaelgibney.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Wondering what folks think of backporting some classloading
> > deadlock-related fixes:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16165
> > and possibly upgrade to Lucene 9.4
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16442
> > particularly considering:
> > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11718
> >
> > The main concerns for all the above are classloading issues. The first
> > one (SlotAcc) I think should be backported, since we know it has
> > manifested in the wild and it's a very self-contained fix.
> >
> > I gather based on SOLR-15254 that the deadlock that would be fixed by
> > Lucene 9.4 upgrade has also manifested; in fact I'm surprised that we
> > haven't seen this issue manifesting more frequently -- maybe it has,
> > but it doesn't get reported/diagnosed because it's an issue that's
> > mostly likely to manifest on startup (when actual people are likely to
> > be paying attention), and is easily "fixed" in the short-term by
> > restarting (again)?. There's some discussion at:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16167
> > and
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15254
> >
> > I wouldn't want to do anything that would substantially delay 9.1.1
> > though...
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 6:17 PM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Still looking for a PR approval for the protobuf upgrade:
> > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1252
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
Re: Solr 9.1.1 bugfix release
Posted by David Smiley <ds...@apache.org>.
+1. Don't add a Lucene upgrade though :-)
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 10:05 AM Michael Gibney <mi...@michaelgibney.net>
wrote:
> Wondering what folks think of backporting some classloading
> deadlock-related fixes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16165
> and possibly upgrade to Lucene 9.4
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16442
> particularly considering:
> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11718
>
> The main concerns for all the above are classloading issues. The first
> one (SlotAcc) I think should be backported, since we know it has
> manifested in the wild and it's a very self-contained fix.
>
> I gather based on SOLR-15254 that the deadlock that would be fixed by
> Lucene 9.4 upgrade has also manifested; in fact I'm surprised that we
> haven't seen this issue manifesting more frequently -- maybe it has,
> but it doesn't get reported/diagnosed because it's an issue that's
> mostly likely to manifest on startup (when actual people are likely to
> be paying attention), and is easily "fixed" in the short-term by
> restarting (again)?. There's some discussion at:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16167
> and
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15254
>
> I wouldn't want to do anything that would substantially delay 9.1.1
> though...
>
> Thoughts?
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 6:17 PM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Still looking for a PR approval for the protobuf upgrade:
> > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1252
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>
>
Re: Solr 9.1.1 bugfix release
Posted by Gus Heck <gu...@gmail.com>.
Ok false alarm I think missed updating the separate solr-test-framework
line in my build (need to parameterize that version or something), I have
other problems with the upgrade now such as import
org.apache.lucene.util.QuickPatchThreadsFilter going away, but the class
def problem disappeared
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 8:47 PM Gus Heck <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I might be finding something. I just tried upgrading JesterJ to 9.1 from
> 9.0 and got
>
> org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene90/Lucene90Codec
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene90/Lucene90Codec
> at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase.<clinit>(LuceneTestCase.java:663)
> at java.base/java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
> at java.base/java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:398)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$2.run(RandomizedRunner.java:627)
> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene90.Lucene90Codec
> at
> java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClass(BuiltinClassLoader.java:581)
> at
> java.base/jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoaders.java:178)
> at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:522)
> ... 4 more
>
> It looks like we upgraded lucene to 9.3 and not the lucene-test-framework
> (still 9.0)... (still looking into this)
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 3:56 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> You're good to go, Michael. Wish you all the best!
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:28 AM Michael Gibney
>> <mi...@michaelgibney.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > Great, thanks Alessandro! Once I get the go-ahead from Ishan that he's
>> > done wrapping up the loose ends from the 9.1.0 release, I'll build an
>> > RC based on 2c669fe43777342758a0042b821efb6aa3ec15b6.
>> >
>> > Michael
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:47 PM Alessandro Benedetti
>> > <a....@sease.io> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > From my side I merged everything and I am monitoring Jenkins!
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, 9 Jan 2023, 10:08 Alessandro Benedetti, <a.benedetti@sease.io
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Michael, yes! Doing it right now!
>> > > >
>> > > > Cheers
>> > > > --------------------------
>> > > > *Alessandro Benedetti*
>> > > > Director @ Sease Ltd.
>> > > > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
>> > > > *Apache Solr PMC Member*
>> > > >
>> > > > e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
>> > > > Consulting | Training | Open Source
>> > > >
>> > > > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
>> > > > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
>> > > > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
>> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
>> > > > <https://github.com/seaseltd>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 17:18, Michael Gibney <
>> michael@michaelgibney.net>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Alessandro, are you still looking to include the SOLR-16588 bugfix?
>> > > >> Ishan, any updates on the handful of tasks that you had mentioned
>> were
>> > > >> still outstanding from the 9.1.0 release? Aside from these two open
>> > > >> questions, it looks like branch_9_1 has settled down with all of
>> the
>> > > >> changes we had discussed for inclusion in 9.1.1 (unless I'm missing
>> > > >> something).
>> > > >> Michael
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 4:50 PM Alessandro Benedetti
>> > > >> <a....@sease.io> wrote:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > discussing on the PR, once clarified a bit around Lucene94 (and a
>> > > >> backport
>> > > >> > to Lucene 9.3 ad hoc for 9.1.1) we should be ready to merge and
>> cherry
>> > > >> pick!
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > --------------------------
>> > > >> > *Alessandro Benedetti*
>> > > >> > Director @ Sease Ltd.
>> > > >> > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
>> > > >> > *Apache Solr PMC Member*
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
>> > > >> > Consulting | Training | Open Source
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
>> > > >> > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
>> > > >> > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
>> > > >> > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> |
>> Github
>> > > >> > <https://github.com/seaseltd>
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 23:26, Michael Gibney <
>> michael@michaelgibney.net>
>> > > >> > wrote:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > > This seems fine to me, assuming no objections from others.
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 4:30 PM Alessandro Benedetti
>> > > >> > > <a....@sease.io> wrote:
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > What about including this as well in 9.1.1 :
>> > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1255 ?
>> > > >> > > > It's an annoying neural search bug, and it's pretty much
>> done, just
>> > > >> > > waiting
>> > > >> > > > for a few checks and then I'll merge it with the changes!
>> > > >> > > > --------------------------
>> > > >> > > > *Alessandro Benedetti*
>> > > >> > > > Director @ Sease Ltd.
>> > > >> > > > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
>> > > >> > > > *Apache Solr PMC Member*
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
>> > > >> > > > Consulting | Training | Open Source
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
>> > > >> > > > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
>> > > >> > > > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
>> > > >> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ>
>> | Github
>> > > >> > > > <https://github.com/seaseltd>
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 17:18, Shawn Heisey <
>> apache@elyograg.org>
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > > On 1/3/23 08:05, Michael Gibney wrote:
>> > > >> > > > > > and possibly upgrade to Lucene 9.4
>> > > >> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16442
>> > > >> > > > > > particularly considering:
>> > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11718
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > It seems like a bad idea to upgrade a critical component
>> to a new
>> > > >> major
>> > > >> > > > > or minor version in a bugfix release, unless that upgrade
>> closes a
>> > > >> > > > > security vulnerability and is fairly limited in scope. I
>> don't
>> > > >> think
>> > > >> > > > > either of those applies.
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > Solr 9.1.0 includes Lucene 9.3.0. There are no further
>> 9.3.x
>> > > >> releases,
>> > > >> > > > > so we don't have that as an option.
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > The main concerns for all the above are classloading
>> issues. The
>> > > >> > > first
>> > > >> > > > > > one (SlotAcc) I think should be backported, since we
>> know it has
>> > > >> > > > > > manifested in the wild and it's a very self-contained
>> fix.
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > My bias would be to NOT upgrade Lucene, for reasons
>> described
>> > > >> above.
>> > > >> > > > > The change on SOLR-16165 looks OK to me for a point
>> release.
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > Thanks,
>> > > >> > > > > Shawn
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
>> > > >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
>> > > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> --
> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>
--
http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
http://www.the111shift.com (play)
Re: Solr 9.1.1 bugfix release
Posted by Gus Heck <gu...@gmail.com>.
I might be finding something. I just tried upgrading JesterJ to 9.1 from
9.0 and got
org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene90/Lucene90Codec
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene90/Lucene90Codec
at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase.<clinit>(LuceneTestCase.java:663)
at java.base/java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
at java.base/java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:398)
at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$2.run(RandomizedRunner.java:627)
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene90.Lucene90Codec
at
java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClass(BuiltinClassLoader.java:581)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoaders.java:178)
at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:522)
... 4 more
It looks like we upgraded lucene to 9.3 and not the lucene-test-framework
(still 9.0)... (still looking into this)
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 3:56 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
> You're good to go, Michael. Wish you all the best!
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:28 AM Michael Gibney
> <mi...@michaelgibney.net> wrote:
> >
> > Great, thanks Alessandro! Once I get the go-ahead from Ishan that he's
> > done wrapping up the loose ends from the 9.1.0 release, I'll build an
> > RC based on 2c669fe43777342758a0042b821efb6aa3ec15b6.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:47 PM Alessandro Benedetti
> > <a....@sease.io> wrote:
> > >
> > > From my side I merged everything and I am monitoring Jenkins!
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 9 Jan 2023, 10:08 Alessandro Benedetti, <a....@sease.io>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Michael, yes! Doing it right now!
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > > --------------------------
> > > > *Alessandro Benedetti*
> > > > Director @ Sease Ltd.
> > > > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> > > > *Apache Solr PMC Member*
> > > >
> > > > e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> > > > Consulting | Training | Open Source
> > > >
> > > > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> > > > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> > > > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
> > > > <https://github.com/seaseltd>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 17:18, Michael Gibney <
> michael@michaelgibney.net>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Alessandro, are you still looking to include the SOLR-16588 bugfix?
> > > >> Ishan, any updates on the handful of tasks that you had mentioned
> were
> > > >> still outstanding from the 9.1.0 release? Aside from these two open
> > > >> questions, it looks like branch_9_1 has settled down with all of the
> > > >> changes we had discussed for inclusion in 9.1.1 (unless I'm missing
> > > >> something).
> > > >> Michael
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 4:50 PM Alessandro Benedetti
> > > >> <a....@sease.io> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > discussing on the PR, once clarified a bit around Lucene94 (and a
> > > >> backport
> > > >> > to Lucene 9.3 ad hoc for 9.1.1) we should be ready to merge and
> cherry
> > > >> pick!
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --------------------------
> > > >> > *Alessandro Benedetti*
> > > >> > Director @ Sease Ltd.
> > > >> > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> > > >> > *Apache Solr PMC Member*
> > > >> >
> > > >> > e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> > > >> > Consulting | Training | Open Source
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> > > >> > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> > > >> > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> > > >> > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> |
> Github
> > > >> > <https://github.com/seaseltd>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 23:26, Michael Gibney <
> michael@michaelgibney.net>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > This seems fine to me, assuming no objections from others.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 4:30 PM Alessandro Benedetti
> > > >> > > <a....@sease.io> wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > What about including this as well in 9.1.1 :
> > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1255 ?
> > > >> > > > It's an annoying neural search bug, and it's pretty much
> done, just
> > > >> > > waiting
> > > >> > > > for a few checks and then I'll merge it with the changes!
> > > >> > > > --------------------------
> > > >> > > > *Alessandro Benedetti*
> > > >> > > > Director @ Sease Ltd.
> > > >> > > > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> > > >> > > > *Apache Solr PMC Member*
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> > > >> > > > Consulting | Training | Open Source
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> > > >> > > > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> > > >> > > > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> > > >> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> |
> Github
> > > >> > > > <https://github.com/seaseltd>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 17:18, Shawn Heisey <
> apache@elyograg.org>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > On 1/3/23 08:05, Michael Gibney wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > and possibly upgrade to Lucene 9.4
> > > >> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16442
> > > >> > > > > > particularly considering:
> > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11718
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > It seems like a bad idea to upgrade a critical component to
> a new
> > > >> major
> > > >> > > > > or minor version in a bugfix release, unless that upgrade
> closes a
> > > >> > > > > security vulnerability and is fairly limited in scope. I
> don't
> > > >> think
> > > >> > > > > either of those applies.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Solr 9.1.0 includes Lucene 9.3.0. There are no further
> 9.3.x
> > > >> releases,
> > > >> > > > > so we don't have that as an option.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > The main concerns for all the above are classloading
> issues. The
> > > >> > > first
> > > >> > > > > > one (SlotAcc) I think should be backported, since we know
> it has
> > > >> > > > > > manifested in the wild and it's a very self-contained fix.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > My bias would be to NOT upgrade Lucene, for reasons
> described
> > > >> above.
> > > >> > > > > The change on SOLR-16165 looks OK to me for a point release.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Thanks,
> > > >> > > > > Shawn
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > > >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > > >>
> > > >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>
>
--
http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
http://www.the111shift.com (play)
Re: Solr 9.1.1 bugfix release
Posted by Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ic...@gmail.com>.
You're good to go, Michael. Wish you all the best!
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:28 AM Michael Gibney
<mi...@michaelgibney.net> wrote:
>
> Great, thanks Alessandro! Once I get the go-ahead from Ishan that he's
> done wrapping up the loose ends from the 9.1.0 release, I'll build an
> RC based on 2c669fe43777342758a0042b821efb6aa3ec15b6.
>
> Michael
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:47 PM Alessandro Benedetti
> <a....@sease.io> wrote:
> >
> > From my side I merged everything and I am monitoring Jenkins!
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 9 Jan 2023, 10:08 Alessandro Benedetti, <a....@sease.io>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Michael, yes! Doing it right now!
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > --------------------------
> > > *Alessandro Benedetti*
> > > Director @ Sease Ltd.
> > > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> > > *Apache Solr PMC Member*
> > >
> > > e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
> > >
> > >
> > > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> > > Consulting | Training | Open Source
> > >
> > > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> > > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> > > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
> > > <https://github.com/seaseltd>
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 17:18, Michael Gibney <mi...@michaelgibney.net>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Alessandro, are you still looking to include the SOLR-16588 bugfix?
> > >> Ishan, any updates on the handful of tasks that you had mentioned were
> > >> still outstanding from the 9.1.0 release? Aside from these two open
> > >> questions, it looks like branch_9_1 has settled down with all of the
> > >> changes we had discussed for inclusion in 9.1.1 (unless I'm missing
> > >> something).
> > >> Michael
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 4:50 PM Alessandro Benedetti
> > >> <a....@sease.io> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > discussing on the PR, once clarified a bit around Lucene94 (and a
> > >> backport
> > >> > to Lucene 9.3 ad hoc for 9.1.1) we should be ready to merge and cherry
> > >> pick!
> > >> >
> > >> > --------------------------
> > >> > *Alessandro Benedetti*
> > >> > Director @ Sease Ltd.
> > >> > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> > >> > *Apache Solr PMC Member*
> > >> >
> > >> > e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> > >> > Consulting | Training | Open Source
> > >> >
> > >> > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> > >> > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> > >> > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> > >> > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
> > >> > <https://github.com/seaseltd>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 23:26, Michael Gibney <mi...@michaelgibney.net>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > This seems fine to me, assuming no objections from others.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 4:30 PM Alessandro Benedetti
> > >> > > <a....@sease.io> wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > What about including this as well in 9.1.1 :
> > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1255 ?
> > >> > > > It's an annoying neural search bug, and it's pretty much done, just
> > >> > > waiting
> > >> > > > for a few checks and then I'll merge it with the changes!
> > >> > > > --------------------------
> > >> > > > *Alessandro Benedetti*
> > >> > > > Director @ Sease Ltd.
> > >> > > > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> > >> > > > *Apache Solr PMC Member*
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> > >> > > > Consulting | Training | Open Source
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> > >> > > > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> > >> > > > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> > >> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
> > >> > > > <https://github.com/seaseltd>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 17:18, Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > On 1/3/23 08:05, Michael Gibney wrote:
> > >> > > > > > and possibly upgrade to Lucene 9.4
> > >> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16442
> > >> > > > > > particularly considering:
> > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11718
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > It seems like a bad idea to upgrade a critical component to a new
> > >> major
> > >> > > > > or minor version in a bugfix release, unless that upgrade closes a
> > >> > > > > security vulnerability and is fairly limited in scope. I don't
> > >> think
> > >> > > > > either of those applies.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Solr 9.1.0 includes Lucene 9.3.0. There are no further 9.3.x
> > >> releases,
> > >> > > > > so we don't have that as an option.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > The main concerns for all the above are classloading issues. The
> > >> > > first
> > >> > > > > > one (SlotAcc) I think should be backported, since we know it has
> > >> > > > > > manifested in the wild and it's a very self-contained fix.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > My bias would be to NOT upgrade Lucene, for reasons described
> > >> above.
> > >> > > > > The change on SOLR-16165 looks OK to me for a point release.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Thanks,
> > >> > > > > Shawn
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
Re: Solr 9.1.1 bugfix release
Posted by Michael Gibney <mi...@michaelgibney.net>.
Great, thanks Alessandro! Once I get the go-ahead from Ishan that he's
done wrapping up the loose ends from the 9.1.0 release, I'll build an
RC based on 2c669fe43777342758a0042b821efb6aa3ec15b6.
Michael
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:47 PM Alessandro Benedetti
<a....@sease.io> wrote:
>
> From my side I merged everything and I am monitoring Jenkins!
>
>
> On Mon, 9 Jan 2023, 10:08 Alessandro Benedetti, <a....@sease.io>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Michael, yes! Doing it right now!
> >
> > Cheers
> > --------------------------
> > *Alessandro Benedetti*
> > Director @ Sease Ltd.
> > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> > *Apache Solr PMC Member*
> >
> > e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
> >
> >
> > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> > Consulting | Training | Open Source
> >
> > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
> > <https://github.com/seaseltd>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 17:18, Michael Gibney <mi...@michaelgibney.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Alessandro, are you still looking to include the SOLR-16588 bugfix?
> >> Ishan, any updates on the handful of tasks that you had mentioned were
> >> still outstanding from the 9.1.0 release? Aside from these two open
> >> questions, it looks like branch_9_1 has settled down with all of the
> >> changes we had discussed for inclusion in 9.1.1 (unless I'm missing
> >> something).
> >> Michael
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 4:50 PM Alessandro Benedetti
> >> <a....@sease.io> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > discussing on the PR, once clarified a bit around Lucene94 (and a
> >> backport
> >> > to Lucene 9.3 ad hoc for 9.1.1) we should be ready to merge and cherry
> >> pick!
> >> >
> >> > --------------------------
> >> > *Alessandro Benedetti*
> >> > Director @ Sease Ltd.
> >> > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> >> > *Apache Solr PMC Member*
> >> >
> >> > e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> >> > Consulting | Training | Open Source
> >> >
> >> > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> >> > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> >> > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> >> > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
> >> > <https://github.com/seaseltd>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 23:26, Michael Gibney <mi...@michaelgibney.net>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > This seems fine to me, assuming no objections from others.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 4:30 PM Alessandro Benedetti
> >> > > <a....@sease.io> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > What about including this as well in 9.1.1 :
> >> > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1255 ?
> >> > > > It's an annoying neural search bug, and it's pretty much done, just
> >> > > waiting
> >> > > > for a few checks and then I'll merge it with the changes!
> >> > > > --------------------------
> >> > > > *Alessandro Benedetti*
> >> > > > Director @ Sease Ltd.
> >> > > > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> >> > > > *Apache Solr PMC Member*
> >> > > >
> >> > > > e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> >> > > > Consulting | Training | Open Source
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> >> > > > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> >> > > > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> >> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
> >> > > > <https://github.com/seaseltd>
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 17:18, Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > On 1/3/23 08:05, Michael Gibney wrote:
> >> > > > > > and possibly upgrade to Lucene 9.4
> >> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16442
> >> > > > > > particularly considering:
> >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11718
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > It seems like a bad idea to upgrade a critical component to a new
> >> major
> >> > > > > or minor version in a bugfix release, unless that upgrade closes a
> >> > > > > security vulnerability and is fairly limited in scope. I don't
> >> think
> >> > > > > either of those applies.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Solr 9.1.0 includes Lucene 9.3.0. There are no further 9.3.x
> >> releases,
> >> > > > > so we don't have that as an option.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > The main concerns for all the above are classloading issues. The
> >> > > first
> >> > > > > > one (SlotAcc) I think should be backported, since we know it has
> >> > > > > > manifested in the wild and it's a very self-contained fix.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > My bias would be to NOT upgrade Lucene, for reasons described
> >> above.
> >> > > > > The change on SOLR-16165 looks OK to me for a point release.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > > Shawn
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> >>
> >>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
Re: Solr 9.1.1 bugfix release
Posted by Alessandro Benedetti <a....@sease.io>.
From my side I merged everything and I am monitoring Jenkins!
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023, 10:08 Alessandro Benedetti, <a....@sease.io>
wrote:
> Hi Michael, yes! Doing it right now!
>
> Cheers
> --------------------------
> *Alessandro Benedetti*
> Director @ Sease Ltd.
> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> *Apache Solr PMC Member*
>
> e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
>
>
> *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> Consulting | Training | Open Source
>
> Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
> <https://github.com/seaseltd>
>
>
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 17:18, Michael Gibney <mi...@michaelgibney.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Alessandro, are you still looking to include the SOLR-16588 bugfix?
>> Ishan, any updates on the handful of tasks that you had mentioned were
>> still outstanding from the 9.1.0 release? Aside from these two open
>> questions, it looks like branch_9_1 has settled down with all of the
>> changes we had discussed for inclusion in 9.1.1 (unless I'm missing
>> something).
>> Michael
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 4:50 PM Alessandro Benedetti
>> <a....@sease.io> wrote:
>> >
>> > discussing on the PR, once clarified a bit around Lucene94 (and a
>> backport
>> > to Lucene 9.3 ad hoc for 9.1.1) we should be ready to merge and cherry
>> pick!
>> >
>> > --------------------------
>> > *Alessandro Benedetti*
>> > Director @ Sease Ltd.
>> > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
>> > *Apache Solr PMC Member*
>> >
>> > e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
>> >
>> >
>> > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
>> > Consulting | Training | Open Source
>> >
>> > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
>> > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
>> > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
>> > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
>> > <https://github.com/seaseltd>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 23:26, Michael Gibney <mi...@michaelgibney.net>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > This seems fine to me, assuming no objections from others.
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 4:30 PM Alessandro Benedetti
>> > > <a....@sease.io> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > What about including this as well in 9.1.1 :
>> > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1255 ?
>> > > > It's an annoying neural search bug, and it's pretty much done, just
>> > > waiting
>> > > > for a few checks and then I'll merge it with the changes!
>> > > > --------------------------
>> > > > *Alessandro Benedetti*
>> > > > Director @ Sease Ltd.
>> > > > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
>> > > > *Apache Solr PMC Member*
>> > > >
>> > > > e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
>> > > > Consulting | Training | Open Source
>> > > >
>> > > > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
>> > > > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
>> > > > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
>> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
>> > > > <https://github.com/seaseltd>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 17:18, Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > On 1/3/23 08:05, Michael Gibney wrote:
>> > > > > > and possibly upgrade to Lucene 9.4
>> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16442
>> > > > > > particularly considering:
>> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11718
>> > > > >
>> > > > > It seems like a bad idea to upgrade a critical component to a new
>> major
>> > > > > or minor version in a bugfix release, unless that upgrade closes a
>> > > > > security vulnerability and is fairly limited in scope. I don't
>> think
>> > > > > either of those applies.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Solr 9.1.0 includes Lucene 9.3.0. There are no further 9.3.x
>> releases,
>> > > > > so we don't have that as an option.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > The main concerns for all the above are classloading issues. The
>> > > first
>> > > > > > one (SlotAcc) I think should be backported, since we know it has
>> > > > > > manifested in the wild and it's a very self-contained fix.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > My bias would be to NOT upgrade Lucene, for reasons described
>> above.
>> > > > > The change on SOLR-16165 looks OK to me for a point release.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > Shawn
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
>> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>> > >
>> > >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>>
>>
Re: Solr 9.1.1 bugfix release
Posted by Alessandro Benedetti <a....@sease.io>.
Hi Michael, yes! Doing it right now!
Cheers
--------------------------
*Alessandro Benedetti*
Director @ Sease Ltd.
*Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
*Apache Solr PMC Member*
e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
*Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
Consulting | Training | Open Source
Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
<https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
<https://github.com/seaseltd>
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 17:18, Michael Gibney <mi...@michaelgibney.net>
wrote:
> Alessandro, are you still looking to include the SOLR-16588 bugfix?
> Ishan, any updates on the handful of tasks that you had mentioned were
> still outstanding from the 9.1.0 release? Aside from these two open
> questions, it looks like branch_9_1 has settled down with all of the
> changes we had discussed for inclusion in 9.1.1 (unless I'm missing
> something).
> Michael
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 4:50 PM Alessandro Benedetti
> <a....@sease.io> wrote:
> >
> > discussing on the PR, once clarified a bit around Lucene94 (and a
> backport
> > to Lucene 9.3 ad hoc for 9.1.1) we should be ready to merge and cherry
> pick!
> >
> > --------------------------
> > *Alessandro Benedetti*
> > Director @ Sease Ltd.
> > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> > *Apache Solr PMC Member*
> >
> > e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
> >
> >
> > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> > Consulting | Training | Open Source
> >
> > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
> > <https://github.com/seaseltd>
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 23:26, Michael Gibney <mi...@michaelgibney.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > This seems fine to me, assuming no objections from others.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 4:30 PM Alessandro Benedetti
> > > <a....@sease.io> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > What about including this as well in 9.1.1 :
> > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1255 ?
> > > > It's an annoying neural search bug, and it's pretty much done, just
> > > waiting
> > > > for a few checks and then I'll merge it with the changes!
> > > > --------------------------
> > > > *Alessandro Benedetti*
> > > > Director @ Sease Ltd.
> > > > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> > > > *Apache Solr PMC Member*
> > > >
> > > > e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> > > > Consulting | Training | Open Source
> > > >
> > > > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> > > > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> > > > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
> > > > <https://github.com/seaseltd>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 17:18, Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 1/3/23 08:05, Michael Gibney wrote:
> > > > > > and possibly upgrade to Lucene 9.4
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16442
> > > > > > particularly considering:
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11718
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems like a bad idea to upgrade a critical component to a new
> major
> > > > > or minor version in a bugfix release, unless that upgrade closes a
> > > > > security vulnerability and is fairly limited in scope. I don't
> think
> > > > > either of those applies.
> > > > >
> > > > > Solr 9.1.0 includes Lucene 9.3.0. There are no further 9.3.x
> releases,
> > > > > so we don't have that as an option.
> > > > >
> > > > > > The main concerns for all the above are classloading issues. The
> > > first
> > > > > > one (SlotAcc) I think should be backported, since we know it has
> > > > > > manifested in the wild and it's a very self-contained fix.
> > > > >
> > > > > My bias would be to NOT upgrade Lucene, for reasons described
> above.
> > > > > The change on SOLR-16165 looks OK to me for a point release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Shawn
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > >
> > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>
>
Re: Solr 9.1.1 bugfix release
Posted by Michael Gibney <mi...@michaelgibney.net>.
Alessandro, are you still looking to include the SOLR-16588 bugfix?
Ishan, any updates on the handful of tasks that you had mentioned were
still outstanding from the 9.1.0 release? Aside from these two open
questions, it looks like branch_9_1 has settled down with all of the
changes we had discussed for inclusion in 9.1.1 (unless I'm missing
something).
Michael
On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 4:50 PM Alessandro Benedetti
<a....@sease.io> wrote:
>
> discussing on the PR, once clarified a bit around Lucene94 (and a backport
> to Lucene 9.3 ad hoc for 9.1.1) we should be ready to merge and cherry pick!
>
> --------------------------
> *Alessandro Benedetti*
> Director @ Sease Ltd.
> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> *Apache Solr PMC Member*
>
> e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
>
>
> *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> Consulting | Training | Open Source
>
> Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
> <https://github.com/seaseltd>
>
>
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 23:26, Michael Gibney <mi...@michaelgibney.net>
> wrote:
>
> > This seems fine to me, assuming no objections from others.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 4:30 PM Alessandro Benedetti
> > <a....@sease.io> wrote:
> > >
> > > What about including this as well in 9.1.1 :
> > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1255 ?
> > > It's an annoying neural search bug, and it's pretty much done, just
> > waiting
> > > for a few checks and then I'll merge it with the changes!
> > > --------------------------
> > > *Alessandro Benedetti*
> > > Director @ Sease Ltd.
> > > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> > > *Apache Solr PMC Member*
> > >
> > > e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
> > >
> > >
> > > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> > > Consulting | Training | Open Source
> > >
> > > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> > > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> > > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
> > > <https://github.com/seaseltd>
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 17:18, Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 1/3/23 08:05, Michael Gibney wrote:
> > > > > and possibly upgrade to Lucene 9.4
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16442
> > > > > particularly considering:
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11718
> > > >
> > > > It seems like a bad idea to upgrade a critical component to a new major
> > > > or minor version in a bugfix release, unless that upgrade closes a
> > > > security vulnerability and is fairly limited in scope. I don't think
> > > > either of those applies.
> > > >
> > > > Solr 9.1.0 includes Lucene 9.3.0. There are no further 9.3.x releases,
> > > > so we don't have that as an option.
> > > >
> > > > > The main concerns for all the above are classloading issues. The
> > first
> > > > > one (SlotAcc) I think should be backported, since we know it has
> > > > > manifested in the wild and it's a very self-contained fix.
> > > >
> > > > My bias would be to NOT upgrade Lucene, for reasons described above.
> > > > The change on SOLR-16165 looks OK to me for a point release.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Shawn
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
Re: Solr 9.1.1 bugfix release
Posted by Alessandro Benedetti <a....@sease.io>.
discussing on the PR, once clarified a bit around Lucene94 (and a backport
to Lucene 9.3 ad hoc for 9.1.1) we should be ready to merge and cherry pick!
--------------------------
*Alessandro Benedetti*
Director @ Sease Ltd.
*Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
*Apache Solr PMC Member*
e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
*Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
Consulting | Training | Open Source
Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
<https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
<https://github.com/seaseltd>
On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 23:26, Michael Gibney <mi...@michaelgibney.net>
wrote:
> This seems fine to me, assuming no objections from others.
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 4:30 PM Alessandro Benedetti
> <a....@sease.io> wrote:
> >
> > What about including this as well in 9.1.1 :
> > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1255 ?
> > It's an annoying neural search bug, and it's pretty much done, just
> waiting
> > for a few checks and then I'll merge it with the changes!
> > --------------------------
> > *Alessandro Benedetti*
> > Director @ Sease Ltd.
> > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> > *Apache Solr PMC Member*
> >
> > e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
> >
> >
> > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> > Consulting | Training | Open Source
> >
> > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
> > <https://github.com/seaseltd>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 17:18, Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On 1/3/23 08:05, Michael Gibney wrote:
> > > > and possibly upgrade to Lucene 9.4
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16442
> > > > particularly considering:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11718
> > >
> > > It seems like a bad idea to upgrade a critical component to a new major
> > > or minor version in a bugfix release, unless that upgrade closes a
> > > security vulnerability and is fairly limited in scope. I don't think
> > > either of those applies.
> > >
> > > Solr 9.1.0 includes Lucene 9.3.0. There are no further 9.3.x releases,
> > > so we don't have that as an option.
> > >
> > > > The main concerns for all the above are classloading issues. The
> first
> > > > one (SlotAcc) I think should be backported, since we know it has
> > > > manifested in the wild and it's a very self-contained fix.
> > >
> > > My bias would be to NOT upgrade Lucene, for reasons described above.
> > > The change on SOLR-16165 looks OK to me for a point release.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Shawn
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > >
> > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>
>
Re: Solr 9.1.1 bugfix release
Posted by Michael Gibney <mi...@michaelgibney.net>.
This seems fine to me, assuming no objections from others.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 4:30 PM Alessandro Benedetti
<a....@sease.io> wrote:
>
> What about including this as well in 9.1.1 :
> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1255 ?
> It's an annoying neural search bug, and it's pretty much done, just waiting
> for a few checks and then I'll merge it with the changes!
> --------------------------
> *Alessandro Benedetti*
> Director @ Sease Ltd.
> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> *Apache Solr PMC Member*
>
> e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
>
>
> *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> Consulting | Training | Open Source
>
> Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
> <https://github.com/seaseltd>
>
>
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 17:18, Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org> wrote:
>
> > On 1/3/23 08:05, Michael Gibney wrote:
> > > and possibly upgrade to Lucene 9.4
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16442
> > > particularly considering:
> > > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11718
> >
> > It seems like a bad idea to upgrade a critical component to a new major
> > or minor version in a bugfix release, unless that upgrade closes a
> > security vulnerability and is fairly limited in scope. I don't think
> > either of those applies.
> >
> > Solr 9.1.0 includes Lucene 9.3.0. There are no further 9.3.x releases,
> > so we don't have that as an option.
> >
> > > The main concerns for all the above are classloading issues. The first
> > > one (SlotAcc) I think should be backported, since we know it has
> > > manifested in the wild and it's a very self-contained fix.
> >
> > My bias would be to NOT upgrade Lucene, for reasons described above.
> > The change on SOLR-16165 looks OK to me for a point release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shawn
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
Re: Solr 9.1.1 bugfix release
Posted by Alessandro Benedetti <a....@sease.io>.
What about including this as well in 9.1.1 :
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1255 ?
It's an annoying neural search bug, and it's pretty much done, just waiting
for a few checks and then I'll merge it with the changes!
--------------------------
*Alessandro Benedetti*
Director @ Sease Ltd.
*Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
*Apache Solr PMC Member*
e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
*Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
Consulting | Training | Open Source
Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
<https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
<https://github.com/seaseltd>
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 17:18, Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org> wrote:
> On 1/3/23 08:05, Michael Gibney wrote:
> > and possibly upgrade to Lucene 9.4
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16442
> > particularly considering:
> > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11718
>
> It seems like a bad idea to upgrade a critical component to a new major
> or minor version in a bugfix release, unless that upgrade closes a
> security vulnerability and is fairly limited in scope. I don't think
> either of those applies.
>
> Solr 9.1.0 includes Lucene 9.3.0. There are no further 9.3.x releases,
> so we don't have that as an option.
>
> > The main concerns for all the above are classloading issues. The first
> > one (SlotAcc) I think should be backported, since we know it has
> > manifested in the wild and it's a very self-contained fix.
>
> My bias would be to NOT upgrade Lucene, for reasons described above.
> The change on SOLR-16165 looks OK to me for a point release.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>
>
Re: Solr 9.1.1 bugfix release
Posted by Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org>.
On 1/3/23 08:05, Michael Gibney wrote:
> and possibly upgrade to Lucene 9.4
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16442
> particularly considering:
> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11718
It seems like a bad idea to upgrade a critical component to a new major
or minor version in a bugfix release, unless that upgrade closes a
security vulnerability and is fairly limited in scope. I don't think
either of those applies.
Solr 9.1.0 includes Lucene 9.3.0. There are no further 9.3.x releases,
so we don't have that as an option.
> The main concerns for all the above are classloading issues. The first
> one (SlotAcc) I think should be backported, since we know it has
> manifested in the wild and it's a very self-contained fix.
My bias would be to NOT upgrade Lucene, for reasons described above.
The change on SOLR-16165 looks OK to me for a point release.
Thanks,
Shawn
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
Re: Solr 9.1.1 bugfix release
Posted by Michael Gibney <mi...@michaelgibney.net>.
Wondering what folks think of backporting some classloading
deadlock-related fixes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16165
and possibly upgrade to Lucene 9.4
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16442
particularly considering:
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11718
The main concerns for all the above are classloading issues. The first
one (SlotAcc) I think should be backported, since we know it has
manifested in the wild and it's a very self-contained fix.
I gather based on SOLR-15254 that the deadlock that would be fixed by
Lucene 9.4 upgrade has also manifested; in fact I'm surprised that we
haven't seen this issue manifesting more frequently -- maybe it has,
but it doesn't get reported/diagnosed because it's an issue that's
mostly likely to manifest on startup (when actual people are likely to
be paying attention), and is easily "fixed" in the short-term by
restarting (again)?. There's some discussion at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16167
and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15254
I wouldn't want to do anything that would substantially delay 9.1.1 though...
Thoughts?
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 6:17 PM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Still looking for a PR approval for the protobuf upgrade:
> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1252
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
Re: Solr 9.1.1 bugfix release
Posted by David Smiley <ds...@apache.org>.
Still looking for a PR approval for the protobuf upgrade:
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1252
Re: Solr 9.1.1 bugfix release
Posted by Alessandro Benedetti <a....@sease.io>.
There's this one I would like to include:
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1245
It's almost ready!
--------------------------
*Alessandro Benedetti*
Director @ Sease Ltd.
*Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
*Apache Solr PMC Member*
e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
*Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
Consulting | Training | Open Source
Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
<https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
<https://github.com/seaseltd>
On Tue, 27 Dec 2022 at 06:38, David Smiley <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
> More specifically:
> SOLR-16443: Upgrade Jackson bom to 2.13.4.20221013 (#1106)
> SOLR-16568: Update FasterXML Woodstox to 6.4.0 (#1209)
> I will push those cherry-picks tonight after my local build succeeds.
>
> And I created a new JIRA issue for Protobuf:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16598 which should be trivial.
> Interestingly we're at a good version on main & branch_9x but it was
> accidental / indirect. It's not appropriate to cherry pick the accidental /
> indirect changes that lead to the CVE fix, as I think we're likely to
> remedy that specific circumstance, thus going back to a vulnerable version
> in main.
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 8:16 AM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for volunteering!
> >
> > I'd like to propose that the upgrades to dependencies due to CVEs be
> > back-ported to 9.1.1. I can help with this. One example I see is
> > woodstox-core.
> >
> > ~ David Smiley
> > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 9:45 AM Michael Gibney <
> michael@michaelgibney.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I'd like to get the ball rolling on a 9.1.1 bugfix release, and
> >> volunteer to be release manager. There aren't very many bugfixes
> >> accumulated since 9.1.0 on `branch_9_1`, but SOLR-16585 in particular
> >> (NPE on MatchAllDocs pagination) should be fixed asap.
> >>
> >> I'm thinking to build a release candidate as early as possible in the
> new
> >> year.
> >>
> >> Are there any outstanding bugfixes that anyone would like to backport
> >> to `branch_9_1` before preparing the release?
> >>
> >> Michael
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
Re: Solr 9.1.1 bugfix release
Posted by David Smiley <ds...@apache.org>.
More specifically:
SOLR-16443: Upgrade Jackson bom to 2.13.4.20221013 (#1106)
SOLR-16568: Update FasterXML Woodstox to 6.4.0 (#1209)
I will push those cherry-picks tonight after my local build succeeds.
And I created a new JIRA issue for Protobuf:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16598 which should be trivial.
Interestingly we're at a good version on main & branch_9x but it was
accidental / indirect. It's not appropriate to cherry pick the accidental /
indirect changes that lead to the CVE fix, as I think we're likely to
remedy that specific circumstance, thus going back to a vulnerable version
in main.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 8:16 AM David Smiley <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks for volunteering!
>
> I'd like to propose that the upgrades to dependencies due to CVEs be
> back-ported to 9.1.1. I can help with this. One example I see is
> woodstox-core.
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 9:45 AM Michael Gibney <mi...@michaelgibney.net>
> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to get the ball rolling on a 9.1.1 bugfix release, and
>> volunteer to be release manager. There aren't very many bugfixes
>> accumulated since 9.1.0 on `branch_9_1`, but SOLR-16585 in particular
>> (NPE on MatchAllDocs pagination) should be fixed asap.
>>
>> I'm thinking to build a release candidate as early as possible in the new
>> year.
>>
>> Are there any outstanding bugfixes that anyone would like to backport
>> to `branch_9_1` before preparing the release?
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>>
>>
Re: Solr 9.1.1 bugfix release
Posted by David Smiley <ds...@apache.org>.
Thanks for volunteering!
I'd like to propose that the upgrades to dependencies due to CVEs be
back-ported to 9.1.1. I can help with this. One example I see is
woodstox-core.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 9:45 AM Michael Gibney <mi...@michaelgibney.net>
wrote:
> I'd like to get the ball rolling on a 9.1.1 bugfix release, and
> volunteer to be release manager. There aren't very many bugfixes
> accumulated since 9.1.0 on `branch_9_1`, but SOLR-16585 in particular
> (NPE on MatchAllDocs pagination) should be fixed asap.
>
> I'm thinking to build a release candidate as early as possible in the new
> year.
>
> Are there any outstanding bugfixes that anyone would like to backport
> to `branch_9_1` before preparing the release?
>
> Michael
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>
>