You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@jclouds.apache.org by "Meyer, Carsten" <ca...@zeiss.com> on 2018/11/11 13:44:33 UTC

Current GSON version?

Dear all,

we are using JClouds in a Spring Framework-based application and are using the current version of Spring (5).
Spring uses a GSON dependency in version 2.8.5 whereas JClouds (in version 2.1.1) is using 2.5. Unfortunately, those GSON versions are not compatible.

Are there intentions of adapting to the current GSON and if so, is there an estimated timeframe?

Thanks for support!

Best regards,
Carsten Meyer

Re: Current GSON version?

Posted by Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org>.

For context, see this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1160

The linked issues must be fixed before upgrading Gson.

On Sun, Nov 11, 2018, 15:18 Andrea Turli <andrea.turli@gmail.com wrote:

> Hi,
>
> there's no specific plans for that, afaik
>
> Would you mind open a PR against master for it?
>
> Best
>
> Il giorno dom 11 nov 2018, 14:44 Meyer, Carsten <ca...@zeiss.com>
> ha scritto:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > we are using JClouds in a Spring Framework-based application and are
> using
> > the current version of Spring (5).
> > Spring uses a GSON dependency in version 2.8.5 whereas JClouds (in
> version
> > 2.1.1) is using 2.5. Unfortunately, those GSON versions are not
> compatible.
> >
> > Are there intentions of adapting to the current GSON and if so, is there
> > an estimated timeframe?
> >
> > Thanks for support!
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Carsten Meyer
> >
> >
>

Re: Current GSON version?

Posted by Andrea Turli <an...@gmail.com>.

Hi,

there's no specific plans for that, afaik

Would you mind open a PR against master for it?

Best

Il giorno dom 11 nov 2018, 14:44 Meyer, Carsten <ca...@zeiss.com>
ha scritto:

> Dear all,
>
> we are using JClouds in a Spring Framework-based application and are using
> the current version of Spring (5).
> Spring uses a GSON dependency in version 2.8.5 whereas JClouds (in version
> 2.1.1) is using 2.5. Unfortunately, those GSON versions are not compatible.
>
> Are there intentions of adapting to the current GSON and if so, is there
> an estimated timeframe?
>
> Thanks for support!
>
> Best regards,
> Carsten Meyer
>
>