Re: Possible per-user "levels of grey" whitelist

[Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Effectively, there's already a way to do that...  use Bayes to
learn those mails as ham!   It works very effectively for that
purpose.

- --j.

Linda W writes:
> One type of mail that I am constantly getting incorrectly classified
> as SPAM is when I do business or ask for a password from a site.
> 
> I wonder if SA's accuracy re: false positives might be improved
> if I could have it process my "Sent" folder to look for
> people I've sent email to recently.
> 
> Ideally, it'd be a time-decay type list, with the ability
> to blacklist a company if it became abusive...
> 
> Just a thought on reducing false-positives of a type I frequently
> get....
> 
> Linda
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFCLf9nMJF5cimLx9ARAkapAJ98OQP6kuRroCRYT/X4YIxID7ecTACfSx+u
9ESIKHL5ChwZOzLhb67J98A=
=R+UE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: Possible per-user "levels of grey" whitelist

[Linda W <sa...@tlinx.org>]

Do you mean have it learn on my "Sent folder" list?

Would it help that much though since the sender is always me and will be
lacking all the Received markers that incoming mail normally has?



Justin Mason wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> Effectively, there's already a way to do that...  use Bayes to
> learn those mails as ham!   It works very effectively for that
> purpose.
> 
> - --j.
> 
> Linda W writes:
>