You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@ofbiz.apache.org by pe...@ec4b.com on 2007/05/04 23:52:02 UTC

OpenTaps and Ofbiz Compatibility

Hi,

Seem to have compiled incompatable versions of Ofbiz and OpenTaps. Which has resulted in the server being offline and it won't come back to life after a power cycle. Server has been down for a few days at this point. Can't seem to rollback the svn.

Does anyone have a any idea of what revisions of OpenTaps are Compatable with what version of Ofbiz.

The logical solution is if I can't rollback I will have to 'roll forward'.


Thanks & Regards,

Peter.


Re: OpenTaps and Ofbiz Compatibility

Posted by Walter Vaughan <wv...@steelerubber.com>.
peter@ec4b.com wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Seem to have compiled incompatable versions of Ofbiz and OpenTaps. Which has resulted in the server being offline and it won't come back to life after a power cycle. Server has been down for a few days at this point. Can't seem to rollback the svn.
> 
> Does anyone have a any idea of what revisions of OpenTaps are Compatable with what version of Ofbiz.

I *think* you should be tracking the release version of ofBiz rather than the trunk

The plan as *I* understand it is that Opentaps 1.0 will be composed of
1) ofBiz Release 4.0
2) Opentaps common libraries
3) Opentaps modules

Opentaps-1.0PREVIEW is undergoing testing right now... :)

You may get better support for this question at
http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=487771

--
Walter

Re: OpenTaps and Ofbiz Compatibility

Posted by Jonathon -- Improov <jo...@improov.com>.
Peter,

By the way, you shouldn't "roll forward" now, if you mean you'll simply be fixing the bugs in your 
currently corrupted OFBiz/OpenTaps combo until it all works. You'll completely lose the ability to 
pull in updates from the OFBiz/OpenTaps official SVN streams.

You must bring your SVN back to a clean state, a state that is "in step with" the official 
OFBiz/OpenTaps SVN streams.

Hope that makes sense to you.

Jonathon

Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
> Peter,
> 
> I have the latest revisions of OFBiz and OpenTaps (Financials and CRMSFA 
> modules) working fine together.
> 
> It is likely that you applied a patch meant for OFBiz. If the patch you 
> applied was made for OFBiz, it likely wasn't meant to be patched unto a 
> OFBiz/OpenTaps combo.
> 
> You had asked this before, about whether it was ok to patch OFBiz 
> updates into OpenTaps, and I had told you that it wasn't ok to patch 
> OFBiz updates into OpenTaps or vice versa.
> 
> Are you able to extract your own codes (customizations) into a 
> consolidated patch file? If you can, you'll be able to reassemble a new 
> OFBiz + OpenTaps combo that works, and then patch in your customizations.
> 
> If you need me to look at it, you'll have to do a dump of your whole 
> SVN, upload it to some FTP server with resumable downloads enabled, and 
> then let me FTP download that dump. I'll try to figure out which 
> revisions of OFBiz + OpenTaps your SVN was forked from.
> 
> I'll need resumable FTP download because the OFBiz/OpenTaps SVN is huge, 
> likely over 60MB. The actual OFBiz codes are actually only 6MB in 
> compressed format, so I'll have a much easier time downloading your SVN 
> to have a look if you can remove the 3rd-party code binaries. As I 
> mentioned before to Karl Eilebrecht, I'll need the MD5 manifest of the 
> 3rd-party code binaries in that case.
> 
> Hope that's not too confusing. If it is, just let me download the whole 
> 60MB of it.
> 
> Jonathon
> 
> peter@ec4b.com wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Seem to have compiled incompatable versions of Ofbiz and OpenTaps. 
>> Which has resulted in the server being offline and it won't come back 
>> to life after a power cycle. Server has been down for a few days at 
>> this point. Can't seem to rollback the svn.
>>
>> Does anyone have a any idea of what revisions of OpenTaps are 
>> Compatable with what version of Ofbiz.
>>
>> The logical solution is if I can't rollback I will have to 'roll 
>> forward'.
>>
>>
>> Thanks & Regards,
>>
>> Peter.
>>
>>
> 
> 


Re: OpenTaps and Ofbiz Compatibility

Posted by Jonathon -- Improov <jo...@improov.com>.
Peter,

I have the latest revisions of OFBiz and OpenTaps (Financials and CRMSFA modules) working fine 
together.

It is likely that you applied a patch meant for OFBiz. If the patch you applied was made for 
OFBiz, it likely wasn't meant to be patched unto a OFBiz/OpenTaps combo.

You had asked this before, about whether it was ok to patch OFBiz updates into OpenTaps, and I had 
told you that it wasn't ok to patch OFBiz updates into OpenTaps or vice versa.

Are you able to extract your own codes (customizations) into a consolidated patch file? If you 
can, you'll be able to reassemble a new OFBiz + OpenTaps combo that works, and then patch in your 
customizations.

If you need me to look at it, you'll have to do a dump of your whole SVN, upload it to some FTP 
server with resumable downloads enabled, and then let me FTP download that dump. I'll try to 
figure out which revisions of OFBiz + OpenTaps your SVN was forked from.

I'll need resumable FTP download because the OFBiz/OpenTaps SVN is huge, likely over 60MB. The 
actual OFBiz codes are actually only 6MB in compressed format, so I'll have a much easier time 
downloading your SVN to have a look if you can remove the 3rd-party code binaries. As I mentioned 
before to Karl Eilebrecht, I'll need the MD5 manifest of the 3rd-party code binaries in that case.

Hope that's not too confusing. If it is, just let me download the whole 60MB of it.

Jonathon

peter@ec4b.com wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Seem to have compiled incompatable versions of Ofbiz and OpenTaps. Which has resulted in the server being offline and it won't come back to life after a power cycle. Server has been down for a few days at this point. Can't seem to rollback the svn.
> 
> Does anyone have a any idea of what revisions of OpenTaps are Compatable with what version of Ofbiz.
> 
> The logical solution is if I can't rollback I will have to 'roll forward'.
> 
> 
> Thanks & Regards,
> 
> Peter.
> 
>