You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Jaroslaw Cwiklik <cw...@apache.org> on 2017/01/20 19:36:48 UTC
[VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.2.0 RC2
Hi,
the UIMA-DUCC 2.2.0 release candidate 2 is ready for voting.
Issues fixed since RC1:
- Fixed agent shutdown issues
- Improved cgroups detection and cleanup
- Refactored agent to fetch cpu,rss,swap and faults from cgroups
- Added documentation for several new commands introduced since the last
release
- Fixed SM to handle restarting instances and not ignore the init-failure
limit.
- Fixed machine sizes in the Viz
The list of changes in Jira:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%202.2.0-Ducc%20AND%20project%20%3D%20UIMA
The source and binary zip/tars are staged to
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uima-ducc/2.2.0/RC2/
The Maven artifacts are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1117
The SVN tags are here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uima-ducc/tags/uima-ducc-2.2.0/
See http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for suggestions on how to
test release candidates.
Please vote on release:
[ ] +1 OK to release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
Thanks
- Jerry Cwiklik
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.2.0 RC2
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Got an unusual miscompare between the -source-release.zip and the svn tag:
Both of these have the issuesFixed generated directory, but
1) The svnTag version of this is missing the content from the css/ and images/
directory (the directories are there, but no files).
2) The jira-report.html appears to be generated at quite different dates:
-- the svn version: generated on January 4th
-- the source-release version: generated on January 20th
My guess is that the issuesFixed generated directory was accidentally partially
committed to SVN (except for the css an image file data, a while ago. Probably
the fix is to delete these from svn trunk.
If that's the cause of this, I don't think this is a blocker.
If something else is going on that indicates some kind of failure in the build
process, that might be a blocker...
Also, for the record, I don't think the 1-Jira-issue-not-closed reported
yesterday is a blocker either.
-Marshall
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.2.0 RC2
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
The test class MessagesTest seems to want to test if internationalization is
working, but doesn't seem to do anything except print out the same message keys
4 times. (Not a blocker).
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.2.0 RC2
Posted by Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>.
The fix for this *is* in RC2. Just forgot to close this before announcing
rc2. The jira is closed now.
-jerry
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> DUCC issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5157 is marked
> "Reopened",
> unresolved, but also is a fix for 2.2.0-Ducc?
>
> -Marshall
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.2.0 RC2
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
DUCC issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5157 is marked "Reopened",
unresolved, but also is a fix for 2.2.0-Ducc?
-Marshall
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.2.0 RC2
Posted by Lou DeGenaro <lo...@gmail.com>.
I contend that MessagesTest and the corresponding internationalization that
I started during DUCC's gestation period years ago should be removed or
uniformly employed, most especially in the UI. This is otherwise invisible
to the enduser and administrator. Not a blocker, and non-trivial to
remove.
If there is no objection, I will open a Jira to remove this a future
release as it adds no value in its present state.
Lou.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> I've finished a partial review of DUCC 2.2.0:
>
> signatures OK
>
> build from source (on Windows, exclude latex) OK.
>
> issues fixed - one issue open 5157 not a blocker - forgot to get closed.
>
> compare svn and source-release - issue with "issuesFixed". - not a blocker
>
> License Notice: OK
>
> I'm voting +1 to release, after others confirm install and operational
> functionality :-).
>
> -Marshall
>
>
>
>
> On 1/26/2017 9:17 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote:
> > The issuesFixed was added to the svn sometime ago to deal with changes
> > plugin 100 issues limitation. I was not able to figure out how to deal
> with
> > that and after consultation with you I've delivered this folder to the
> svn
> > as a short term fix. We aim to be more agile now :), and post releases
> more
> > often. I just removed this folder from the svn. The issuesFixes is auto
> > generated by mvn during a build and should not be in the svn.
> >
> > Not sure what to say about MessagesTest. Perhaps others can chime in.
> >
> > Indeed I forgot to modify TOC in the Release Notes. Will fix that either
> in
> > the next RC or for the next release.
> >
> > -jerry
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The Release Notes file added 2 new h2. level topics: Migration from a
> >> Prior
> >> Release, and Limitations.
> >> The table of contents is missing the last section.
> >>
> >> not a blocker...
> >>
> >> -Marshall
> >>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.2.0 RC2
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
I've finished a partial review of DUCC 2.2.0:
signatures OK
build from source (on Windows, exclude latex) OK.
issues fixed - one issue open 5157 not a blocker - forgot to get closed.
compare svn and source-release - issue with "issuesFixed". - not a blocker
License Notice: OK
I'm voting +1 to release, after others confirm install and operational
functionality :-).
-Marshall
On 1/26/2017 9:17 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote:
> The issuesFixed was added to the svn sometime ago to deal with changes
> plugin 100 issues limitation. I was not able to figure out how to deal with
> that and after consultation with you I've delivered this folder to the svn
> as a short term fix. We aim to be more agile now :), and post releases more
> often. I just removed this folder from the svn. The issuesFixes is auto
> generated by mvn during a build and should not be in the svn.
>
> Not sure what to say about MessagesTest. Perhaps others can chime in.
>
> Indeed I forgot to modify TOC in the Release Notes. Will fix that either in
> the next RC or for the next release.
>
> -jerry
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>
>> The Release Notes file added 2 new h2. level topics: Migration from a
>> Prior
>> Release, and Limitations.
>> The table of contents is missing the last section.
>>
>> not a blocker...
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.2.0 RC2
Posted by Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>.
The issuesFixed was added to the svn sometime ago to deal with changes
plugin 100 issues limitation. I was not able to figure out how to deal with
that and after consultation with you I've delivered this folder to the svn
as a short term fix. We aim to be more agile now :), and post releases more
often. I just removed this folder from the svn. The issuesFixes is auto
generated by mvn during a build and should not be in the svn.
Not sure what to say about MessagesTest. Perhaps others can chime in.
Indeed I forgot to modify TOC in the Release Notes. Will fix that either in
the next RC or for the next release.
-jerry
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> The Release Notes file added 2 new h2. level topics: Migration from a
> Prior
> Release, and Limitations.
> The table of contents is missing the last section.
>
> not a blocker...
>
> -Marshall
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.2.0 RC2
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
The Release Notes file added 2 new h2. level topics: Migration from a Prior
Release, and Limitations.
The table of contents is missing the last section.
not a blocker...
-Marshall