You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cayenne.apache.org by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> on 2018/04/11 13:33:05 UTC
Turn off Jenkins?
How about we turn off Jenkins CI? Whatever we tried, we could never achieve stable builds there. Not sure if that's the diversity of the ASF CI runner configurations, shared ~/.m2 directory or something else. To me Jenkins results now are just noise that I never bother to investigate anymore.
Travis [1] seems to be much more stable, and runs tests on many more DBs anyways.
Thoughts?
Andrus
[1] https://travis-ci.org/apache/cayenne/builds
[2] https://travis-ci.org/apache/cayenne/builds/365094572
Re: Turn off Jenkins?
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
All Cayenne-related configs are deleted from Jenkins. I guess we might setup 3.1 branch to build on Travis (though maybe not - there may still be random failures on 3.1 due to the imperfect test DB cleanup facilities).
Andrus
> On Apr 25, 2018, at 2:00 PM, Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org> wrote:
>
> Yes, I agree. I tried hard a few years ago to set up Jenkins as best I could to make it reliable. But travis is both easier and more consistent.
>
> Ari
>
> On 25/4/18 5:07pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> I guess no replies indicates lazy consensus. Going to proceed with it when I have spare moment.
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>>> On Apr 11, 2018, at 4:33 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> How about we turn off Jenkins CI? Whatever we tried, we could never achieve stable builds there. Not sure if that's the diversity of the ASF CI runner configurations, shared ~/.m2 directory or something else. To me Jenkins results now are just noise that I never bother to investigate anymore.
>>>
>>> Travis [1] seems to be much more stable, and runs tests on many more DBs anyways.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] https://travis-ci.org/apache/cayenne/builds
>>> [2] https://travis-ci.org/apache/cayenne/builds/365094572
Re: Turn off Jenkins?
Posted by Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>.
Yes, I agree. I tried hard a few years ago to set up Jenkins as best I
could to make it reliable. But travis is both easier and more consistent.
Ari
On 25/4/18 5:07pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> I guess no replies indicates lazy consensus. Going to proceed with it when I have spare moment.
>
> Andrus
>
>
>> On Apr 11, 2018, at 4:33 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>
>> How about we turn off Jenkins CI? Whatever we tried, we could never achieve stable builds there. Not sure if that's the diversity of the ASF CI runner configurations, shared ~/.m2 directory or something else. To me Jenkins results now are just noise that I never bother to investigate anymore.
>>
>> Travis [1] seems to be much more stable, and runs tests on many more DBs anyways.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>> [1] https://travis-ci.org/apache/cayenne/builds
>> [2] https://travis-ci.org/apache/cayenne/builds/365094572
Re: Turn off Jenkins?
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
I guess no replies indicates lazy consensus. Going to proceed with it when I have spare moment.
Andrus
> On Apr 11, 2018, at 4:33 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>
> How about we turn off Jenkins CI? Whatever we tried, we could never achieve stable builds there. Not sure if that's the diversity of the ASF CI runner configurations, shared ~/.m2 directory or something else. To me Jenkins results now are just noise that I never bother to investigate anymore.
>
> Travis [1] seems to be much more stable, and runs tests on many more DBs anyways.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Andrus
>
>
> [1] https://travis-ci.org/apache/cayenne/builds
> [2] https://travis-ci.org/apache/cayenne/builds/365094572