You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@karaf.apache.org by agrz <al...@medisite.de> on 2015/03/16 16:37:56 UTC
Karaf 3.0.3 OSGi Version
Hi,
I am a little bit confused what is the OSGi Specification Version supported
in Karaf 3.0.3.
On the main page (http://karaf.apache.org/) it states Karaf 3.x supports
OSGi 4.3.
On the dependency matrix page
(http://karaf.apache.org/index/documentation/karaf-dependencies/karaf-deps-3.0.x.html)
it shows OSGi Core is Version 5.0.0 and the felix version is 4.2.1 which
should also support OSGi 5 as far as I know.
What is the exact version of OSGi Framework Karaf 3.0.3 supports and is
tested for?
Thank You
Alexander
--
View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-3-0-3-OSGi-Version-tp4039091.html
Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Karaf 3.0.3 OSGi Version
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi guys,
as reminder, K4 is plan for end of April.
Regards
JB
On 03/17/2015 02:36 PM, Arnaud Deprez wrote:
> I'd rather would like to see K4 released too but I don't know when it
> will be planned.
> As far as I know there are still lot of work to do for a K4 release.
> As I'm not (yet) involved in it, it's a supposition based on the
> changelog :-).
>
> Currently, I think there are some confusion with the actual version
> 2.4.Z and 3.0.Z.
> I think it's a bit strange to a lambda user that karaf 2.4.Z has a full
> support for OSGi 5 and Karaf 3.0.Z has only a partial support.
>
> So I think that
>
> * whether the documentation should be clearer to say that K3 will be
> abandoned
> * whether we should have a K3.1.Z release as JB said
>
> I think the solution 2 is better regarding the lambda user than the
> solution 1 but the work to do may be too hard if we have to throw it
> away regarding K4.
> I don't know actually.
>
> Regards,
>
> Arnaud
>
> 2015-03-17 13:51 GMT+01:00 Achim Nierbeck <bcanhome@googlemail.com
> <ma...@googlemail.com>>:
>
> well, I guess that would be true as a minor version upgrade on the
> framework would suggest a minor version bump on K3.
>
> tbh, I'd rather would like to see K4 released ... but it might be a
> possible solution to have a lighter "upgrade" to it again.
>
> regards, Achim
>
> 2015-03-17 13:48 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net
> <ma...@nanthrax.net>>:
>
> Hi Arnaud,
>
> if we move this way, it would make sense to go to Karaf 3.1.x as
> it's a major "update" on K3.
>
> But I think it makes sense.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 03/17/2015 01:42 PM, Arnaud Deprez wrote:
>
> Hi JB,
>
> I think it makes sense to upgrade the felix framework in K3
> at least to
> be aligned with K2.4.Z in order to avoid confusion.
> Or maybe K3 won't have any improvements and all the effort
> should be
> concentrated on K4.
> I think the documentation should be clearer for this topic,
> shouldn't it ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Arnaud
>
> 2015-03-17 11:23 GMT+01:00 agrz
> <alexander.grzesik@medisite.de
> <ma...@medisite.de>
> <mailto:alexander.grzesik@__medisite.de
> <ma...@medisite.de>>>:
>
> Thank you for the Clarification.
> Alex
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.__com/Karaf-3-0-3-OSGi-Version-__tp4039091p4039114.html
> <http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-3-0-3-OSGi-Version-tp4039091p4039114.html>
> Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
>
>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Apache Member
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
> Committer & Project Lead
> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
>
> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Karaf 3.0.3 OSGi Version
Posted by Arnaud Deprez <ar...@gmail.com>.
I'd rather would like to see K4 released too but I don't know when it will
be planned.
As far as I know there are still lot of work to do for a K4 release.
As I'm not (yet) involved in it, it's a supposition based on the changelog
:-).
Currently, I think there are some confusion with the actual version 2.4.Z
and 3.0.Z.
I think it's a bit strange to a lambda user that karaf 2.4.Z has a full
support for OSGi 5 and Karaf 3.0.Z has only a partial support.
So I think that
- whether the documentation should be clearer to say that K3 will be
abandoned
- whether we should have a K3.1.Z release as JB said
I think the solution 2 is better regarding the lambda user than the
solution 1 but the work to do may be too hard if we have to throw it away
regarding K4.
I don't know actually.
Regards,
Arnaud
2015-03-17 13:51 GMT+01:00 Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>:
> well, I guess that would be true as a minor version upgrade on the
> framework would suggest a minor version bump on K3.
>
> tbh, I'd rather would like to see K4 released ... but it might be a
> possible solution to have a lighter "upgrade" to it again.
>
> regards, Achim
>
> 2015-03-17 13:48 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
>
>> Hi Arnaud,
>>
>> if we move this way, it would make sense to go to Karaf 3.1.x as it's a
>> major "update" on K3.
>>
>> But I think it makes sense.
>>
>> Thoughts ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 03/17/2015 01:42 PM, Arnaud Deprez wrote:
>>
>>> Hi JB,
>>>
>>> I think it makes sense to upgrade the felix framework in K3 at least to
>>> be aligned with K2.4.Z in order to avoid confusion.
>>> Or maybe K3 won't have any improvements and all the effort should be
>>> concentrated on K4.
>>> I think the documentation should be clearer for this topic, shouldn't it
>>> ?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Arnaud
>>>
>>> 2015-03-17 11:23 GMT+01:00 agrz <alexander.grzesik@medisite.de
>>> <ma...@medisite.de>>:
>>>
>>> Thank you for the Clarification.
>>> Alex
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-3-0-3-OSGi-Version-
>>> tp4039091p4039114.html
>>> Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Apache Member
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
> Project Lead
> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
>
> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
>
>
Re: Karaf 3.0.3 OSGi Version
Posted by Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>.
well, I guess that would be true as a minor version upgrade on the
framework would suggest a minor version bump on K3.
tbh, I'd rather would like to see K4 released ... but it might be a
possible solution to have a lighter "upgrade" to it again.
regards, Achim
2015-03-17 13:48 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
> Hi Arnaud,
>
> if we move this way, it would make sense to go to Karaf 3.1.x as it's a
> major "update" on K3.
>
> But I think it makes sense.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 03/17/2015 01:42 PM, Arnaud Deprez wrote:
>
>> Hi JB,
>>
>> I think it makes sense to upgrade the felix framework in K3 at least to
>> be aligned with K2.4.Z in order to avoid confusion.
>> Or maybe K3 won't have any improvements and all the effort should be
>> concentrated on K4.
>> I think the documentation should be clearer for this topic, shouldn't it ?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Arnaud
>>
>> 2015-03-17 11:23 GMT+01:00 agrz <alexander.grzesik@medisite.de
>> <ma...@medisite.de>>:
>>
>> Thank you for the Clarification.
>> Alex
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-3-0-3-OSGi-Version-
>> tp4039091p4039114.html
>> Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
--
Apache Member
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
Re: Karaf 3.0.3 OSGi Version
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Arnaud,
if we move this way, it would make sense to go to Karaf 3.1.x as it's a
major "update" on K3.
But I think it makes sense.
Thoughts ?
Regards
JB
On 03/17/2015 01:42 PM, Arnaud Deprez wrote:
> Hi JB,
>
> I think it makes sense to upgrade the felix framework in K3 at least to
> be aligned with K2.4.Z in order to avoid confusion.
> Or maybe K3 won't have any improvements and all the effort should be
> concentrated on K4.
> I think the documentation should be clearer for this topic, shouldn't it ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Arnaud
>
> 2015-03-17 11:23 GMT+01:00 agrz <alexander.grzesik@medisite.de
> <ma...@medisite.de>>:
>
> Thank you for the Clarification.
> Alex
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-3-0-3-OSGi-Version-tp4039091p4039114.html
> Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Karaf 3.0.3 OSGi Version
Posted by Arnaud Deprez <ar...@gmail.com>.
Hi JB,
I think it makes sense to upgrade the felix framework in K3 at least to be
aligned with K2.4.Z in order to avoid confusion.
Or maybe K3 won't have any improvements and all the effort should be
concentrated on K4.
I think the documentation should be clearer for this topic, shouldn't it ?
Regards,
Arnaud
2015-03-17 11:23 GMT+01:00 agrz <al...@medisite.de>:
> Thank you for the Clarification.
> Alex
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-3-0-3-OSGi-Version-tp4039091p4039114.html
> Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: Karaf 3.0.3 OSGi Version
Posted by agrz <al...@medisite.de>.
Thank you for the Clarification.
Alex
--
View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-3-0-3-OSGi-Version-tp4039091p4039114.html
Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Karaf 3.0.3 OSGi Version
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Alex,
Felix 4.2.1 doesn't have full OSGi r5 support, even if it supports most
of the features (it just didn't go through the different validation).
So K3 with Felix 4.2.1 is full OSGi r4.3, and mostly r5 compliant. If
you use Equinox, you have full r5 supports.
Could make sense to upgrade the Felix framework version to have full r5
support.
Regards
JB
On 03/16/2015 04:37 PM, agrz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a little bit confused what is the OSGi Specification Version supported
> in Karaf 3.0.3.
> On the main page (http://karaf.apache.org/) it states Karaf 3.x supports
> OSGi 4.3.
> On the dependency matrix page
> (http://karaf.apache.org/index/documentation/karaf-dependencies/karaf-deps-3.0.x.html)
> it shows OSGi Core is Version 5.0.0 and the felix version is 4.2.1 which
> should also support OSGi 5 as far as I know.
> What is the exact version of OSGi Framework Karaf 3.0.3 supports and is
> tested for?
>
> Thank You
> Alexander
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-3-0-3-OSGi-Version-tp4039091.html
> Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com