You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@xerces.apache.org by Assaf Arkin <ar...@exoffice.com> on 2000/02/05 00:51:12 UTC
Deferred Element Definition
Jason Crickmer has been running into a problem using the deferred DOM.
Apparently with an entity defined as:
<!ENTITY fname "Jason">
and a reference defines as <body>Hello &fname;,</body> the deferred
document generates a DeferredElementDefinition instead of a
DeferredElement or Element.
ui.DOMTreeFull attempts to construct the tree and match the node type
based on an array, and since ELEMENT_DEFINITION_NODE is not part of the
node type it supports, it throws an array index out of bounds exception.
Has anyone looked into this problem?
arkin
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Assaf Arkin www.exoffice.com
CTO, Exoffice Technologies, Inc. www.exolab.org
Re: Deferred Element Definition
Posted by Assaf Arkin <ar...@exoffice.com>.
I will repeat after you:
WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
He reported the problem directly to me, I tracked it down to the faulty
line and have no clue how to proceed. I'm afraid of breaking something
that might be required for DOM L2 support.
So I'm asking if someone knows what, why and how to fix it.
arkin
twleung@sauria.com wrote:
>
> If he didn't report the bug here, nobody has looked into it.
>
> Repeat after me:
>
> <whine>
> WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
> WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
> WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
> WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
> WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
> </whine>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Assaf Arkin <ar...@exoffice.com>
> To: <xe...@xml.apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 3:51 PM
> Subject: Deferred Element Definition
>
> > Jason Crickmer has been running into a problem using the deferred DOM.
> >
> > Apparently with an entity defined as:
> >
> > <!ENTITY fname "Jason">
> >
> > and a reference defines as <body>Hello &fname;,</body> the deferred
> > document generates a DeferredElementDefinition instead of a
> > DeferredElement or Element.
> >
> > ui.DOMTreeFull attempts to construct the tree and match the node type
> > based on an array, and since ELEMENT_DEFINITION_NODE is not part of the
> > node type it supports, it throws an array index out of bounds exception.
> >
> > Has anyone looked into this problem?
> >
> > arkin
> >
> >
> > --
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Assaf Arkin www.exoffice.com
> > CTO, Exoffice Technologies, Inc. www.exolab.org
> >
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Assaf Arkin www.exoffice.com
CTO, Exoffice Technologies, Inc. www.exolab.org
Re: Deferred Element Definition
Posted by Pierpaolo Fumagalli <pi...@apache.org>.
Yep... I was just about to do so... I just downloaded BugZilla and i'm
going to install it on my machine here (so, if I screw up something,
it's not going to hurt anyone!).
Then I'll move the installation over to xml.apache.org...
Pier
Mike Pogue wrote:
>
> Working on it. The PMC vote is over, and Bugzilla was approved.
> I'm trying to get Pier to install it ASAP -- but, he is also quite busy,
> so I've suggested that he can talk to you, Ted, for assistance!
> :-)
>
> Mike
>
> twleung@sauria.com wrote:
> >
> > If he didn't report the bug here, nobody has looked into it.
> >
> > Repeat after me:
> >
> > <whine>
> > WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
> > WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
> > WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
> > WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
> > WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
> > </whine>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
- P I E R -
stable structure erected over water to allow the docking of seacraft
<ma...@betaversion.org> <http://www.betaversion.org/~pier/>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
- ApacheCON Y2K: Come to the official Apache developers conference -
-------------------- <http://www.apachecon.com> --------------------
Re: Deferred Element Definition
Posted by Mike Pogue <mp...@apache.org>.
Working on it. The PMC vote is over, and Bugzilla was approved.
I'm trying to get Pier to install it ASAP -- but, he is also quite busy,
so I've suggested that he can talk to you, Ted, for assistance!
:-)
Mike
twleung@sauria.com wrote:
>
> If he didn't report the bug here, nobody has looked into it.
>
> Repeat after me:
>
> <whine>
> WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
> WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
> WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
> WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
> WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
> </whine>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Assaf Arkin <ar...@exoffice.com>
> To: <xe...@xml.apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 3:51 PM
> Subject: Deferred Element Definition
>
> > Jason Crickmer has been running into a problem using the deferred DOM.
> >
> > Apparently with an entity defined as:
> >
> > <!ENTITY fname "Jason">
> >
> > and a reference defines as <body>Hello &fname;,</body> the deferred
> > document generates a DeferredElementDefinition instead of a
> > DeferredElement or Element.
> >
> > ui.DOMTreeFull attempts to construct the tree and match the node type
> > based on an array, and since ELEMENT_DEFINITION_NODE is not part of the
> > node type it supports, it throws an array index out of bounds exception.
> >
> > Has anyone looked into this problem?
> >
> > arkin
> >
> >
> > --
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Assaf Arkin www.exoffice.com
> > CTO, Exoffice Technologies, Inc. www.exolab.org
> >
Re: Deferred Element Definition
Posted by tw...@sauria.com.
If he didn't report the bug here, nobody has looked into it.
Repeat after me:
<whine>
WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
</whine>
----- Original Message -----
From: Assaf Arkin <ar...@exoffice.com>
To: <xe...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 3:51 PM
Subject: Deferred Element Definition
> Jason Crickmer has been running into a problem using the deferred DOM.
>
> Apparently with an entity defined as:
>
> <!ENTITY fname "Jason">
>
> and a reference defines as <body>Hello &fname;,</body> the deferred
> document generates a DeferredElementDefinition instead of a
> DeferredElement or Element.
>
> ui.DOMTreeFull attempts to construct the tree and match the node type
> based on an array, and since ELEMENT_DEFINITION_NODE is not part of the
> node type it supports, it throws an array index out of bounds exception.
>
> Has anyone looked into this problem?
>
> arkin
>
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Assaf Arkin www.exoffice.com
> CTO, Exoffice Technologies, Inc. www.exolab.org
>