Docs accurate?

[Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>]

[Not a subscriber to this list]

Hi,
On page http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/ContributorWorkflow, the remote
repository is sometimes referred to as 'origin' and sometimes as
'couchdb'. Are those references correct and I have misunderstood the
setup, or is it an editing mistake?

Cheers
-- 
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
河南南路555弄15号1901室。
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java

I live here; http://tinyurl.com/3xugrbk
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/6a2pl4j
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug

Re: Docs accurate?

[Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com>]

On 24 November 2012 04:24, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org> wrote:
> [Not a subscriber to this list]

BCC'd reply.

> Hi,
> On page http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/ContributorWorkflow, the remote
> repository is sometimes referred to as 'origin' and sometimes as
> 'couchdb'. Are those references correct and I have misunderstood the
> setup, or is it an editing mistake?

I think it's a mistake. Fixed (hopefully).

The docs assume you're cloning off the canonical repo as you should
do, and therefore the initial origin will be the ASF one.

You can always rename that to asf or apache or whatever:

    git remote rename origin asf

for example.

A+
Dave