You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "krishna ramachandran (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/02/17 00:46:18 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-13349) adding a split and union to a streaming application cause big performance hit

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

krishna ramachandran updated SPARK-13349:
-----------------------------------------
    Summary: adding a split and union to a streaming application cause big performance hit  (was: adding a split and union to a streaming application causes big performance hit)

> adding a split and union to a streaming application cause big performance hit
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-13349
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13349
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.1
>            Reporter: krishna ramachandran
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 1.4.2
>
>
> We have a streaming application containing approximately 12 stages every batch, running in streaming mode (4 sec batches). Each stage persists output to cassandra
> the pipeline stages 
> stage 1
> ---> receive Stream A --> map --> filter -> (union with another stream B) --> map --> groupbykey --> transform --> reducebykey --> map
> we go thro' few more stages of transforms and save to database. 
> Around stage 5, we union the output of Dstream from stage 1 (in red) with another stream (generated by split during stage 2) and save that state
> It appears the whole execution thus far is repeated which is redundant (I can see this in execution graph & also performance -> processing time). Processing time per batch nearly doubles or triples.
> This additional & redundant processing cause each batch to run as much as 2.5 times slower compared to runs without the union - union for most batches does not alter the original DStream (union with an empty set). If I cache the DStream (red block output), performance improves substantially but hit out of memory errors within few hours.
> What is the recommended way to cache/unpersist in such a scenario? there is no dstream level "unpersist"
> setting "spark.streaming.unpersist" to true and streamingContext.remember("duration") did not help. Still seeing out of memory errors



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org