You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@any23.apache.org by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> on 2014/08/23 18:05:23 UTC
Proposed Charter: RDF Data Shapes Working Group (Call for Review)
W3C is creating a new working group to work on the validation of RDF
data. "Shapes" is code language for this.
Since an initial draft of a charter, there has a been a lot of
discussion of charter on the public W3C list:
public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/
and this has resulted in a proposed charter:
http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/charter
"""
Deliverables
An RDF vocabulary, such as Resource Shapes 2.0, for expressing these
shapes in RDF triples, so they can be stored, queried, analyzed, and
manipulated with normal RDF tools, with some extensibility mechanism for
complex use cases.
Semantics, possibly defined as SPARQL operations, specifying how shapes
are evaluated against RDF graphs.
OPTIONAL - Compact, human-readable, non-RDF syntax for expressing
constraints on RDF graph patterns (aka shapes), suitable for the use
cases determined by the group.
"""
If any committer wants to comment, the Apache Software Foundation can
respond to the formal request for comments. We would need to produce a
single, consolidated, agreed response.
If any committer wants to participate, and does not work for an W3C
member [*], Apache can nominate you to the working group. (Note: you'll
need to invest a significant amount of time to be effective and probably
travel. Apache does not provide any funding.)
Andy
W3C rep for ASF
[*] If you work for a W3C member, you should go via that route or the
legal issues may get very messy.
Re: Proposed Charter: RDF Data Shapes Working Group (Call for Review)
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
Unless I hear otherwise within 24 hours, I'll express ASF support for
the creation of this new working group.
Andy
On 23/08/14 17:05, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> W3C is creating a new working group to work on the validation of RDF
> data. "Shapes" is code language for this.
>
> Since an initial draft of a charter, there has a been a lot of
> discussion of charter on the public W3C list:
>
> public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/
>
> and this has resulted in a proposed charter:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/charter
>
> """
> Deliverables
>
> An RDF vocabulary, such as Resource Shapes 2.0, for expressing these
> shapes in RDF triples, so they can be stored, queried, analyzed, and
> manipulated with normal RDF tools, with some extensibility mechanism for
> complex use cases.
>
> Semantics, possibly defined as SPARQL operations, specifying how shapes
> are evaluated against RDF graphs.
>
> OPTIONAL - Compact, human-readable, non-RDF syntax for expressing
> constraints on RDF graph patterns (aka shapes), suitable for the use
> cases determined by the group.
> """
>
> If any committer wants to comment, the Apache Software Foundation can
> respond to the formal request for comments. We would need to produce a
> single, consolidated, agreed response.
>
> If any committer wants to participate, and does not work for an W3C
> member [*], Apache can nominate you to the working group. (Note: you'll
> need to invest a significant amount of time to be effective and probably
> travel. Apache does not provide any funding.)
>
> Andy
> W3C rep for ASF
>
> [*] If you work for a W3C member, you should go via that route or the
> legal issues may get very messy.
>
Re: Proposed Charter: RDF Data Shapes Working Group (Call for
Review)
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Thanks for sharing, Andy.
Expanding your email to include dev@oodt.a.o and dev@tika.a.o since
both projects deal with RDF data too.
All, FYI below.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>
Reply-To: "dev@any23.apache.org" <de...@any23.apache.org>
Date: Saturday, August 23, 2014 9:05 AM
To: "dev@marmotta.apache.org" <de...@marmotta.apache.org>,
"dev@clerezza.apache.org" <de...@clerezza.apache.org>,
"dev@stanbol.apache.org" <de...@stanbol.apache.org>, "dev@jena.apache.org"
<de...@jena.apache.org>, "dev@any23.apache.org" <de...@any23.apache.org>
Subject: Proposed Charter: RDF Data Shapes Working Group (Call for Review)
>W3C is creating a new working group to work on the validation of RDF
>data. "Shapes" is code language for this.
>
>Since an initial draft of a charter, there has a been a lot of
>discussion of charter on the public W3C list:
>
> public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/
>
>and this has resulted in a proposed charter:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/charter
>
>"""
>Deliverables
>
>An RDF vocabulary, such as Resource Shapes 2.0, for expressing these
>shapes in RDF triples, so they can be stored, queried, analyzed, and
>manipulated with normal RDF tools, with some extensibility mechanism for
>complex use cases.
>
>Semantics, possibly defined as SPARQL operations, specifying how shapes
>are evaluated against RDF graphs.
>
>OPTIONAL - Compact, human-readable, non-RDF syntax for expressing
>constraints on RDF graph patterns (aka shapes), suitable for the use
>cases determined by the group.
>"""
>
>If any committer wants to comment, the Apache Software Foundation can
>respond to the formal request for comments. We would need to produce a
>single, consolidated, agreed response.
>
>If any committer wants to participate, and does not work for an W3C
>member [*], Apache can nominate you to the working group. (Note: you'll
>need to invest a significant amount of time to be effective and probably
>travel. Apache does not provide any funding.)
>
> Andy
> W3C rep for ASF
>
>[*] If you work for a W3C member, you should go via that route or the
>legal issues may get very messy.
>
Re: Proposed Charter: RDF Data Shapes Working Group (Call for
Review)
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Thanks for sharing, Andy.
Expanding your email to include dev@oodt.a.o and dev@tika.a.o since
both projects deal with RDF data too.
All, FYI below.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>
Reply-To: "dev@any23.apache.org" <de...@any23.apache.org>
Date: Saturday, August 23, 2014 9:05 AM
To: "dev@marmotta.apache.org" <de...@marmotta.apache.org>,
"dev@clerezza.apache.org" <de...@clerezza.apache.org>,
"dev@stanbol.apache.org" <de...@stanbol.apache.org>, "dev@jena.apache.org"
<de...@jena.apache.org>, "dev@any23.apache.org" <de...@any23.apache.org>
Subject: Proposed Charter: RDF Data Shapes Working Group (Call for Review)
>W3C is creating a new working group to work on the validation of RDF
>data. "Shapes" is code language for this.
>
>Since an initial draft of a charter, there has a been a lot of
>discussion of charter on the public W3C list:
>
> public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/
>
>and this has resulted in a proposed charter:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/charter
>
>"""
>Deliverables
>
>An RDF vocabulary, such as Resource Shapes 2.0, for expressing these
>shapes in RDF triples, so they can be stored, queried, analyzed, and
>manipulated with normal RDF tools, with some extensibility mechanism for
>complex use cases.
>
>Semantics, possibly defined as SPARQL operations, specifying how shapes
>are evaluated against RDF graphs.
>
>OPTIONAL - Compact, human-readable, non-RDF syntax for expressing
>constraints on RDF graph patterns (aka shapes), suitable for the use
>cases determined by the group.
>"""
>
>If any committer wants to comment, the Apache Software Foundation can
>respond to the formal request for comments. We would need to produce a
>single, consolidated, agreed response.
>
>If any committer wants to participate, and does not work for an W3C
>member [*], Apache can nominate you to the working group. (Note: you'll
>need to invest a significant amount of time to be effective and probably
>travel. Apache does not provide any funding.)
>
> Andy
> W3C rep for ASF
>
>[*] If you work for a W3C member, you should go via that route or the
>legal issues may get very messy.
>
Re: Proposed Charter: RDF Data Shapes Working Group (Call for
Review)
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Thanks for sharing, Andy.
Expanding your email to include dev@oodt.a.o and dev@tika.a.o since
both projects deal with RDF data too.
All, FYI below.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>
Reply-To: "dev@any23.apache.org" <de...@any23.apache.org>
Date: Saturday, August 23, 2014 9:05 AM
To: "dev@marmotta.apache.org" <de...@marmotta.apache.org>,
"dev@clerezza.apache.org" <de...@clerezza.apache.org>,
"dev@stanbol.apache.org" <de...@stanbol.apache.org>, "dev@jena.apache.org"
<de...@jena.apache.org>, "dev@any23.apache.org" <de...@any23.apache.org>
Subject: Proposed Charter: RDF Data Shapes Working Group (Call for Review)
>W3C is creating a new working group to work on the validation of RDF
>data. "Shapes" is code language for this.
>
>Since an initial draft of a charter, there has a been a lot of
>discussion of charter on the public W3C list:
>
> public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/
>
>and this has resulted in a proposed charter:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/charter
>
>"""
>Deliverables
>
>An RDF vocabulary, such as Resource Shapes 2.0, for expressing these
>shapes in RDF triples, so they can be stored, queried, analyzed, and
>manipulated with normal RDF tools, with some extensibility mechanism for
>complex use cases.
>
>Semantics, possibly defined as SPARQL operations, specifying how shapes
>are evaluated against RDF graphs.
>
>OPTIONAL - Compact, human-readable, non-RDF syntax for expressing
>constraints on RDF graph patterns (aka shapes), suitable for the use
>cases determined by the group.
>"""
>
>If any committer wants to comment, the Apache Software Foundation can
>respond to the formal request for comments. We would need to produce a
>single, consolidated, agreed response.
>
>If any committer wants to participate, and does not work for an W3C
>member [*], Apache can nominate you to the working group. (Note: you'll
>need to invest a significant amount of time to be effective and probably
>travel. Apache does not provide any funding.)
>
> Andy
> W3C rep for ASF
>
>[*] If you work for a W3C member, you should go via that route or the
>legal issues may get very messy.
>
Re: Proposed Charter: RDF Data Shapes Working Group (Call for Review)
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
Unless I hear otherwise within 24 hours, I'll express ASF support for
the creation of this new working group.
Andy
On 23/08/14 17:05, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> W3C is creating a new working group to work on the validation of RDF
> data. "Shapes" is code language for this.
>
> Since an initial draft of a charter, there has a been a lot of
> discussion of charter on the public W3C list:
>
> public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/
>
> and this has resulted in a proposed charter:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/charter
>
> """
> Deliverables
>
> An RDF vocabulary, such as Resource Shapes 2.0, for expressing these
> shapes in RDF triples, so they can be stored, queried, analyzed, and
> manipulated with normal RDF tools, with some extensibility mechanism for
> complex use cases.
>
> Semantics, possibly defined as SPARQL operations, specifying how shapes
> are evaluated against RDF graphs.
>
> OPTIONAL - Compact, human-readable, non-RDF syntax for expressing
> constraints on RDF graph patterns (aka shapes), suitable for the use
> cases determined by the group.
> """
>
> If any committer wants to comment, the Apache Software Foundation can
> respond to the formal request for comments. We would need to produce a
> single, consolidated, agreed response.
>
> If any committer wants to participate, and does not work for an W3C
> member [*], Apache can nominate you to the working group. (Note: you'll
> need to invest a significant amount of time to be effective and probably
> travel. Apache does not provide any funding.)
>
> Andy
> W3C rep for ASF
>
> [*] If you work for a W3C member, you should go via that route or the
> legal issues may get very messy.
>
Re: Proposed Charter: RDF Data Shapes Working Group (Call for
Review)
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Thanks for sharing, Andy.
Expanding your email to include dev@oodt.a.o and dev@tika.a.o since
both projects deal with RDF data too.
All, FYI below.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>
Reply-To: "dev@any23.apache.org" <de...@any23.apache.org>
Date: Saturday, August 23, 2014 9:05 AM
To: "dev@marmotta.apache.org" <de...@marmotta.apache.org>,
"dev@clerezza.apache.org" <de...@clerezza.apache.org>,
"dev@stanbol.apache.org" <de...@stanbol.apache.org>, "dev@jena.apache.org"
<de...@jena.apache.org>, "dev@any23.apache.org" <de...@any23.apache.org>
Subject: Proposed Charter: RDF Data Shapes Working Group (Call for Review)
>W3C is creating a new working group to work on the validation of RDF
>data. "Shapes" is code language for this.
>
>Since an initial draft of a charter, there has a been a lot of
>discussion of charter on the public W3C list:
>
> public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/
>
>and this has resulted in a proposed charter:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/charter
>
>"""
>Deliverables
>
>An RDF vocabulary, such as Resource Shapes 2.0, for expressing these
>shapes in RDF triples, so they can be stored, queried, analyzed, and
>manipulated with normal RDF tools, with some extensibility mechanism for
>complex use cases.
>
>Semantics, possibly defined as SPARQL operations, specifying how shapes
>are evaluated against RDF graphs.
>
>OPTIONAL - Compact, human-readable, non-RDF syntax for expressing
>constraints on RDF graph patterns (aka shapes), suitable for the use
>cases determined by the group.
>"""
>
>If any committer wants to comment, the Apache Software Foundation can
>respond to the formal request for comments. We would need to produce a
>single, consolidated, agreed response.
>
>If any committer wants to participate, and does not work for an W3C
>member [*], Apache can nominate you to the working group. (Note: you'll
>need to invest a significant amount of time to be effective and probably
>travel. Apache does not provide any funding.)
>
> Andy
> W3C rep for ASF
>
>[*] If you work for a W3C member, you should go via that route or the
>legal issues may get very messy.
>
Re: Proposed Charter: RDF Data Shapes Working Group (Call for
Review)
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Thanks for sharing, Andy.
Expanding your email to include dev@oodt.a.o and dev@tika.a.o since
both projects deal with RDF data too.
All, FYI below.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>
Reply-To: "dev@any23.apache.org" <de...@any23.apache.org>
Date: Saturday, August 23, 2014 9:05 AM
To: "dev@marmotta.apache.org" <de...@marmotta.apache.org>,
"dev@clerezza.apache.org" <de...@clerezza.apache.org>,
"dev@stanbol.apache.org" <de...@stanbol.apache.org>, "dev@jena.apache.org"
<de...@jena.apache.org>, "dev@any23.apache.org" <de...@any23.apache.org>
Subject: Proposed Charter: RDF Data Shapes Working Group (Call for Review)
>W3C is creating a new working group to work on the validation of RDF
>data. "Shapes" is code language for this.
>
>Since an initial draft of a charter, there has a been a lot of
>discussion of charter on the public W3C list:
>
> public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/
>
>and this has resulted in a proposed charter:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/charter
>
>"""
>Deliverables
>
>An RDF vocabulary, such as Resource Shapes 2.0, for expressing these
>shapes in RDF triples, so they can be stored, queried, analyzed, and
>manipulated with normal RDF tools, with some extensibility mechanism for
>complex use cases.
>
>Semantics, possibly defined as SPARQL operations, specifying how shapes
>are evaluated against RDF graphs.
>
>OPTIONAL - Compact, human-readable, non-RDF syntax for expressing
>constraints on RDF graph patterns (aka shapes), suitable for the use
>cases determined by the group.
>"""
>
>If any committer wants to comment, the Apache Software Foundation can
>respond to the formal request for comments. We would need to produce a
>single, consolidated, agreed response.
>
>If any committer wants to participate, and does not work for an W3C
>member [*], Apache can nominate you to the working group. (Note: you'll
>need to invest a significant amount of time to be effective and probably
>travel. Apache does not provide any funding.)
>
> Andy
> W3C rep for ASF
>
>[*] If you work for a W3C member, you should go via that route or the
>legal issues may get very messy.
>
Re: Proposed Charter: RDF Data Shapes Working Group (Call for
Review)
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Thanks for sharing, Andy.
Expanding your email to include dev@oodt.a.o and dev@tika.a.o since
both projects deal with RDF data too.
All, FYI below.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>
Reply-To: "dev@any23.apache.org" <de...@any23.apache.org>
Date: Saturday, August 23, 2014 9:05 AM
To: "dev@marmotta.apache.org" <de...@marmotta.apache.org>,
"dev@clerezza.apache.org" <de...@clerezza.apache.org>,
"dev@stanbol.apache.org" <de...@stanbol.apache.org>, "dev@jena.apache.org"
<de...@jena.apache.org>, "dev@any23.apache.org" <de...@any23.apache.org>
Subject: Proposed Charter: RDF Data Shapes Working Group (Call for Review)
>W3C is creating a new working group to work on the validation of RDF
>data. "Shapes" is code language for this.
>
>Since an initial draft of a charter, there has a been a lot of
>discussion of charter on the public W3C list:
>
> public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/
>
>and this has resulted in a proposed charter:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/charter
>
>"""
>Deliverables
>
>An RDF vocabulary, such as Resource Shapes 2.0, for expressing these
>shapes in RDF triples, so they can be stored, queried, analyzed, and
>manipulated with normal RDF tools, with some extensibility mechanism for
>complex use cases.
>
>Semantics, possibly defined as SPARQL operations, specifying how shapes
>are evaluated against RDF graphs.
>
>OPTIONAL - Compact, human-readable, non-RDF syntax for expressing
>constraints on RDF graph patterns (aka shapes), suitable for the use
>cases determined by the group.
>"""
>
>If any committer wants to comment, the Apache Software Foundation can
>respond to the formal request for comments. We would need to produce a
>single, consolidated, agreed response.
>
>If any committer wants to participate, and does not work for an W3C
>member [*], Apache can nominate you to the working group. (Note: you'll
>need to invest a significant amount of time to be effective and probably
>travel. Apache does not provide any funding.)
>
> Andy
> W3C rep for ASF
>
>[*] If you work for a W3C member, you should go via that route or the
>legal issues may get very messy.
>
Re: Proposed Charter: RDF Data Shapes Working Group (Call for Review)
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
Unless I hear otherwise within 24 hours, I'll express ASF support for
the creation of this new working group.
Andy
On 23/08/14 17:05, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> W3C is creating a new working group to work on the validation of RDF
> data. "Shapes" is code language for this.
>
> Since an initial draft of a charter, there has a been a lot of
> discussion of charter on the public W3C list:
>
> public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/
>
> and this has resulted in a proposed charter:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/charter
>
> """
> Deliverables
>
> An RDF vocabulary, such as Resource Shapes 2.0, for expressing these
> shapes in RDF triples, so they can be stored, queried, analyzed, and
> manipulated with normal RDF tools, with some extensibility mechanism for
> complex use cases.
>
> Semantics, possibly defined as SPARQL operations, specifying how shapes
> are evaluated against RDF graphs.
>
> OPTIONAL - Compact, human-readable, non-RDF syntax for expressing
> constraints on RDF graph patterns (aka shapes), suitable for the use
> cases determined by the group.
> """
>
> If any committer wants to comment, the Apache Software Foundation can
> respond to the formal request for comments. We would need to produce a
> single, consolidated, agreed response.
>
> If any committer wants to participate, and does not work for an W3C
> member [*], Apache can nominate you to the working group. (Note: you'll
> need to invest a significant amount of time to be effective and probably
> travel. Apache does not provide any funding.)
>
> Andy
> W3C rep for ASF
>
> [*] If you work for a W3C member, you should go via that route or the
> legal issues may get very messy.
>
Re: Proposed Charter: RDF Data Shapes Working Group (Call for
Review)
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Thanks for sharing, Andy.
Expanding your email to include dev@oodt.a.o and dev@tika.a.o since
both projects deal with RDF data too.
All, FYI below.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>
Reply-To: "dev@any23.apache.org" <de...@any23.apache.org>
Date: Saturday, August 23, 2014 9:05 AM
To: "dev@marmotta.apache.org" <de...@marmotta.apache.org>,
"dev@clerezza.apache.org" <de...@clerezza.apache.org>,
"dev@stanbol.apache.org" <de...@stanbol.apache.org>, "dev@jena.apache.org"
<de...@jena.apache.org>, "dev@any23.apache.org" <de...@any23.apache.org>
Subject: Proposed Charter: RDF Data Shapes Working Group (Call for Review)
>W3C is creating a new working group to work on the validation of RDF
>data. "Shapes" is code language for this.
>
>Since an initial draft of a charter, there has a been a lot of
>discussion of charter on the public W3C list:
>
> public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/
>
>and this has resulted in a proposed charter:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/charter
>
>"""
>Deliverables
>
>An RDF vocabulary, such as Resource Shapes 2.0, for expressing these
>shapes in RDF triples, so they can be stored, queried, analyzed, and
>manipulated with normal RDF tools, with some extensibility mechanism for
>complex use cases.
>
>Semantics, possibly defined as SPARQL operations, specifying how shapes
>are evaluated against RDF graphs.
>
>OPTIONAL - Compact, human-readable, non-RDF syntax for expressing
>constraints on RDF graph patterns (aka shapes), suitable for the use
>cases determined by the group.
>"""
>
>If any committer wants to comment, the Apache Software Foundation can
>respond to the formal request for comments. We would need to produce a
>single, consolidated, agreed response.
>
>If any committer wants to participate, and does not work for an W3C
>member [*], Apache can nominate you to the working group. (Note: you'll
>need to invest a significant amount of time to be effective and probably
>travel. Apache does not provide any funding.)
>
> Andy
> W3C rep for ASF
>
>[*] If you work for a W3C member, you should go via that route or the
>legal issues may get very messy.
>
Re: Proposed Charter: RDF Data Shapes Working Group (Call for Review)
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
Unless I hear otherwise within 24 hours, I'll express ASF support for
the creation of this new working group.
Andy
On 23/08/14 17:05, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> W3C is creating a new working group to work on the validation of RDF
> data. "Shapes" is code language for this.
>
> Since an initial draft of a charter, there has a been a lot of
> discussion of charter on the public W3C list:
>
> public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/
>
> and this has resulted in a proposed charter:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/charter
>
> """
> Deliverables
>
> An RDF vocabulary, such as Resource Shapes 2.0, for expressing these
> shapes in RDF triples, so they can be stored, queried, analyzed, and
> manipulated with normal RDF tools, with some extensibility mechanism for
> complex use cases.
>
> Semantics, possibly defined as SPARQL operations, specifying how shapes
> are evaluated against RDF graphs.
>
> OPTIONAL - Compact, human-readable, non-RDF syntax for expressing
> constraints on RDF graph patterns (aka shapes), suitable for the use
> cases determined by the group.
> """
>
> If any committer wants to comment, the Apache Software Foundation can
> respond to the formal request for comments. We would need to produce a
> single, consolidated, agreed response.
>
> If any committer wants to participate, and does not work for an W3C
> member [*], Apache can nominate you to the working group. (Note: you'll
> need to invest a significant amount of time to be effective and probably
> travel. Apache does not provide any funding.)
>
> Andy
> W3C rep for ASF
>
> [*] If you work for a W3C member, you should go via that route or the
> legal issues may get very messy.
>
Re: Proposed Charter: RDF Data Shapes Working Group (Call for Review)
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
Unless I hear otherwise within 24 hours, I'll express ASF support for
the creation of this new working group.
Andy
On 23/08/14 17:05, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> W3C is creating a new working group to work on the validation of RDF
> data. "Shapes" is code language for this.
>
> Since an initial draft of a charter, there has a been a lot of
> discussion of charter on the public W3C list:
>
> public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/
>
> and this has resulted in a proposed charter:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/charter
>
> """
> Deliverables
>
> An RDF vocabulary, such as Resource Shapes 2.0, for expressing these
> shapes in RDF triples, so they can be stored, queried, analyzed, and
> manipulated with normal RDF tools, with some extensibility mechanism for
> complex use cases.
>
> Semantics, possibly defined as SPARQL operations, specifying how shapes
> are evaluated against RDF graphs.
>
> OPTIONAL - Compact, human-readable, non-RDF syntax for expressing
> constraints on RDF graph patterns (aka shapes), suitable for the use
> cases determined by the group.
> """
>
> If any committer wants to comment, the Apache Software Foundation can
> respond to the formal request for comments. We would need to produce a
> single, consolidated, agreed response.
>
> If any committer wants to participate, and does not work for an W3C
> member [*], Apache can nominate you to the working group. (Note: you'll
> need to invest a significant amount of time to be effective and probably
> travel. Apache does not provide any funding.)
>
> Andy
> W3C rep for ASF
>
> [*] If you work for a W3C member, you should go via that route or the
> legal issues may get very messy.
>