You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "Alan D. Cabrera" <ad...@toolazydogs.com> on 2005/01/25 02:36:08 UTC
RE: Review - svn commit: r126264
The IDL files are defined by OMG. Can we put ASF headers in them?
Regards,
Alan
-----Original Message-----
From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:dsundstrom@gluecode.com]
Sent: Mon 1/24/2005 5:53 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Cc:
Subject: Review - svn commit: r126264
Mark,
Wow! This is very impressive work. I spent some time reading over this
(well the first half... the thing is huge). Most of the comments, I
have are just my curiosity and don't really need to be fixed. Other
are notes on differences between this code an geronimo, and I these
cases I think we should change current geronimo or this new code so we
don't have multiple ways to do the same thing (BTW, I generally don't
have a preference on which code we change unless one is broken :) Then
there are the few coding convention things, and finally there are a few
nit picky things :)
Thanks for the great work,
-dain
On Jan 23, 2005, at 11:33 PM, adc@apache.org wrote:
> Added: geronimo/trunk/modules/interop/src/idl/CosNaming.idl
> Url:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/geronimo/trunk/modules/interop/src/idl/
> CosNaming.idl?view=auto&rev=126264
>
> Added: geronimo/trunk/modules/interop/src/idl/GIOP.idl
> Url:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/geronimo/trunk/modules/interop/src/idl/
> GIOP.idl?view=auto&rev=126264
>
> Added: geronimo/trunk/modules/interop/src/idl/IIOP.idl
> Url:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/geronimo/trunk/modules/interop/src/idl/
> IIOP.idl?view=auto&rev=126264
>
> Added: geronimo/trunk/modules/interop/src/idl/IOP.idl
> Url:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/geronimo/trunk/modules/interop/src/idl/
> IOP.idl?view=auto&rev=126264
>
> Added:
> geronimo/trunk/modules/interop/src/idl/org-apache-geronimo-interop-
> rmi-iiop.idl
> Url:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/geronimo/trunk/modules/interop/src/idl/
> org-apache-geronimo-interop-rmi-iiop.idl?view=auto&rev=126264
The idl files need Apache license headers... maybe in the comments that
are copied into the generated code.
Re: Review - svn commit: r126264
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <ds...@gluecode.com>.
Thanks for the link Jeff.
If you download the IDF file pack on that page, it contains just idl
files without any notice or license, but if you pull down the actual
CORBA spec it has a two page license right at the top. After a quick
read I think the most important part for us is (remember INAL):
Subject to all of the terms and conditions below, the owners of the
copyright in this specification hereby grant you a fully-paid up,
non-exclusive, nontransferable, perpetual, worldwide license (without
the right to sublicense), to use this specification to create and
distribute software and special purpose specifications that are based
upon this specification, and to use, copy, and distribute this
specification as provided under the Copyright Act; provided that: (1)
both the copyright notice identified above and this permission notice
appear on any copies of this specification; (2) the use of the
specifications is for informational purposes and will not be copied or
posted on any network computer or broadcast in any media and will not
be otherwise resold or transferred for commercial purposes; and (3) no
modifications are made to this specification. This limited permission
automatically terminates without notice if you breach any of these
terms or conditions. Upon termination, you will destroy immediately any
copies of the specifications in your possession or control.
My guess it is up to Geir to decide what we do, but I propose we put a
notice on the IDL files telling people to read the NOTICE file. In the
notice file we put the copyright notice as required in 1, and snip the
entire license section from the spec and put it in an CORBA-license.txt
file.
-dain
--
Dain Sundstrom
Chief Architect
Gluecode Software
310.536.8355, ext. 26
On Jan 26, 2005, at 10:29 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
> Corba 3.0.2 Spec is here:
>
> http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/corba_iiop.htm
>
> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>> Also does anyone have a URL to the spec? I personally would find it
>> convent to have a link in the files and in the Notice file.
>> -dain
>> On Jan 26, 2005, at 9:17 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jan 24, 2005, at 10:05 PM, Mark wrote:
>>>
>>>> The GIOP, IOP, IIOP were taken from the CORBA 3.x spec. I should
>>>> probably add a readme.txt to the interop/src/idl directory with the
>>>> locations of where the files came from.
>>>
>>>
>>> Is there any statement in the spec indicating some kind of rights
>>> grant or restriction?
>>>
>>> geir
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alan has added a few files for CSIv2.
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Are they specified by OMG or are they *the* OMG files? I would
>>>>> say if they are the former we put the ASL notice on them. If they
>>>>> are the latter, I would expect we would need an OMG header on
>>>>> them.
>>>>>
>>>>> -dain
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dain Sundstrom
>>>>> Chief Architect
>>>>> Gluecode Software
>>>>> 310.536.8355, ext. 26
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 24, 2005, at 5:36 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The IDL files are defined by OMG. Can we put ASF headers in them?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Alan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
>>> geir@gluecode.com
Re: Review - svn commit: r126264
Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@savoirtech.com>.
Corba 3.0.2 Spec is here:
http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/corba_iiop.htm
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> Also does anyone have a URL to the spec? I personally would find it
> convent to have a link in the files and in the Notice file.
>
> -dain
>
> On Jan 26, 2005, at 9:17 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 24, 2005, at 10:05 PM, Mark wrote:
>>
>>> The GIOP, IOP, IIOP were taken from the CORBA 3.x spec. I should
>>> probably add a readme.txt to the interop/src/idl directory with the
>>> locations of where the files came from.
>>
>>
>> Is there any statement in the spec indicating some kind of rights
>> grant or restriction?
>>
>> geir
>>
>>>
>>> Alan has added a few files for CSIv2.
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> Are they specified by OMG or are they *the* OMG files? I would say
>>>> if they are the former we put the ASL notice on them. If they are
>>>> the latter, I would expect we would need an OMG header on them.
>>>>
>>>> -dain
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dain Sundstrom
>>>> Chief Architect
>>>> Gluecode Software
>>>> 310.536.8355, ext. 26
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 24, 2005, at 5:36 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The IDL files are defined by OMG. Can we put ASF headers in them?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Alan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
>> geir@gluecode.com
Re: Review - svn commit: r126264
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <ds...@gluecode.com>.
Also does anyone have a URL to the spec? I personally would find it
convent to have a link in the files and in the Notice file.
-dain
On Jan 26, 2005, at 9:17 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>
> On Jan 24, 2005, at 10:05 PM, Mark wrote:
>
>> The GIOP, IOP, IIOP were taken from the CORBA 3.x spec. I should
>> probably add a readme.txt to the interop/src/idl directory with the
>> locations of where the files came from.
>
> Is there any statement in the spec indicating some kind of rights
> grant or restriction?
>
> geir
>
>>
>> Alan has added a few files for CSIv2.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>>
>>> Are they specified by OMG or are they *the* OMG files? I would say
>>> if they are the former we put the ASL notice on them. If they are
>>> the latter, I would expect we would need an OMG header on them.
>>>
>>> -dain
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dain Sundstrom
>>> Chief Architect
>>> Gluecode Software
>>> 310.536.8355, ext. 26
>>>
>>> On Jan 24, 2005, at 5:36 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>
>>>> The IDL files are defined by OMG. Can we put ASF headers in them?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Alan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>
>>
> --
> Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
> geir@gluecode.com
Re: Review - svn commit: r126264
Posted by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@4quarters.com>.
On Jan 24, 2005, at 10:05 PM, Mark wrote:
> The GIOP, IOP, IIOP were taken from the CORBA 3.x spec. I should
> probably add a readme.txt to the interop/src/idl directory with the
> locations of where the files came from.
Is there any statement in the spec indicating some kind of rights grant
or restriction?
geir
>
> Alan has added a few files for CSIv2.
>
> Mark
>
> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>
>> Are they specified by OMG or are they *the* OMG files? I would say
>> if they are the former we put the ASL notice on them. If they are
>> the latter, I would expect we would need an OMG header on them.
>>
>> -dain
>>
>> --
>> Dain Sundstrom
>> Chief Architect
>> Gluecode Software
>> 310.536.8355, ext. 26
>>
>> On Jan 24, 2005, at 5:36 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>
>>> The IDL files are defined by OMG. Can we put ASF headers in them?
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alan
>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>
>
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
geir@gluecode.com
Re: Review - svn commit: r126264
Posted by Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org>.
Mark wrote:
> The GIOP, IOP, IIOP were taken from the CORBA 3.x spec. I should
> probably add a readme.txt to the interop/src/idl directory with the
> locations of where the files came from.
>
I would suggest the NOTICE file, both in the iiop module and in the
project root, as that is the traditional place where 3rd party notices go.
--
Jeremy
Re: Review - svn commit: r126264
Posted by Mark <de...@hotmail.com>.
The GIOP, IOP, IIOP were taken from the CORBA 3.x spec. I should
probably add a readme.txt to the interop/src/idl directory with the
locations of where the files came from.
Alan has added a few files for CSIv2.
Mark
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> Are they specified by OMG or are they *the* OMG files? I would say if
> they are the former we put the ASL notice on them. If they are the
> latter, I would expect we would need an OMG header on them.
>
> -dain
>
> --
> Dain Sundstrom
> Chief Architect
> Gluecode Software
> 310.536.8355, ext. 26
>
> On Jan 24, 2005, at 5:36 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>> The IDL files are defined by OMG. Can we put ASF headers in them?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>
>
>
> .
>
Re: Review - svn commit: r126264
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <ds...@gluecode.com>.
Are they specified by OMG or are they *the* OMG files? I would say if
they are the former we put the ASL notice on them. If they are the
latter, I would expect we would need an OMG header on them.
-dain
--
Dain Sundstrom
Chief Architect
Gluecode Software
310.536.8355, ext. 26
On Jan 24, 2005, at 5:36 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> The IDL files are defined by OMG. Can we put ASF headers in them?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan