[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1366) Rename Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED/TOKENIZED/NO_NORMS

["Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1366:
---------------------------------------

    Attachment: LUCENE-1366.patch

Initial patch attached.

I intend also fix all places where we use the now-deprecated older names to use the new names on the next rev of this patch, but wanted to get the basic change out first in case anyone has violent reactions to the new proposed names :)  Naming is always the hardest part!

> Rename Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED/TOKENIZED/NO_NORMS
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1366
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1366
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.9, 2.0.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.3.1, 2.3.2
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.4
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1366.patch
>
>
> There is confusion about these current Field options and I think we
> should rename them, deprecating the old names in 2.4/2.9 and removing
> them in 3.0.  How about this:
> {code}
> TOKENIZED --> ANALYZED
> UN_TOKENIZED --> NOT_ANALYZED
> NO_NORMS --> NOT_ANALYZED_NO_NORMS
> {code}
> Should we also add ANALYZED_NO_NORMS?
> Spinoff from here:
>     http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-java-user/200808.mbox/%3C48a3076a.2679420a.1c53.ffffa5c4%40mx.google.com%3E
>     

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org