You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by Günter Knauf <fu...@apache.org> on 2004/06/15 15:53:37 UTC
why is jk_registry.h in ./jk/native2/common? /2
Hi folks,
can please some of the other commiters give some feedback?
possible responses are:
[ ] dont know
[ ] move it to ./jk/native2/include
[ ] dontr move it - it has to stay in common for xxx reason
I'm for moving it - which raises the question if a file can be moved from one dir into another in CVS?
Can a CVS guru please comment?
just looking at ./jk/native2/common and asking me for whatever reason the jk_registry.h is in ./jk/native2/common and not in ./jk/native2/include ?? For that one .h I have to -Include the common dir...
should we move it to ./jk/native2/include ?
Guenter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: why is jk_registry.h in ./jk/native2/common? /2
Posted by Endre Stølsvik <En...@Stolsvik.com>.
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Kurt Miller wrote:
| From: "Günter Knauf" <fu...@apache.org>
| > [X ] dont know
|
| If moving the file loses its CVS history it may be a good reason
| for it to stay put.
Ehh - no, that's a really bad reason.
It will get a "new" history -from there on-, but it will still have its
old history from where you moved it from. So that if you check out the
14th of June 2004 version, it will be in its old place, and everything
will compile, and if you check out the 15th of June 2004 version, it will
be in its new place (and not its old), and everything will compile. Get
it?
Endre.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: why is jk_registry.h in ./jk/native2/common? /2
Posted by Kurt Miller <tr...@apache.org>.
From: "Günter Knauf" <fu...@apache.org>
> [X ] dont know
If moving the file loses its CVS history it may be a good reason
for it to stay put.
-Kurt
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
RE: why is jk_registry.h in ./jk/native2/common? /2
Posted by Keith Wannamaker <Ke...@Wannamaker.org>.
Hi Guenter, I don't see any reason not to move it, but I
would be sure to update the devstudio as well as build.xml
files. Probably the best thing to do is delete it and
commit it with a message indicating the original location.
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: Günter Knauf [mailto:fuankg@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 8:54 AM
To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: why is jk_registry.h in ./jk/native2/common? /2
Hi folks,
can please some of the other commiters give some feedback?
possible responses are:
[ ] dont know
[X] move it to ./jk/native2/include
[ ] dontr move it - it has to stay in common for xxx reason
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org