You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@maven.apache.org by Stephen Connolly <st...@gmail.com> on 2014/02/13 16:14:03 UTC
[VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August 2009.
During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release.
I would argue that we should just therefore just declare Maven 2.x as end
of life.
This vote is therefore to resolve this issue.
The vote will be decided on the basis of committer votes cast. If the
majority of votes from committers (which includes PMC members) are in
favour then we will declare 2.x end of life.
If you are a committer and voting -1, then we will assume that you are
willing to step up and act as a release manager to get a 2.2.2 release out
(which would hopefully include being able to not barf on maven-metadata.xml
that uses the <snapshotVersions> schema generated by Maven 3.x but the
release manager gets to decide what it is they want to release)
The decision on this is actually quite simple as if there is nobody
committer to act as a release manager for the 2.x line, then it is end of
life.
+1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release manager
for this line of releases
0: I have no opinion
-1: Maven 2.x is not end of life, I am willing to act as release manager
for this line of releases
The vote will be open for 72h and may be closed earlier in the unlikely
event that all Maven committers have cast a vote before the 72h are up.
-Stephen
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net>.
+1
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Anders Hammar <an...@hammar.net> wrote:
> +1
>
> /Anders
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August
> 2009.
> >
> > During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release.
> >
> > I would argue that we should just therefore just declare Maven 2.x as end
> > of life.
> >
> > This vote is therefore to resolve this issue.
> >
> > The vote will be decided on the basis of committer votes cast. If the
> > majority of votes from committers (which includes PMC members) are in
> > favour then we will declare 2.x end of life.
> >
> > If you are a committer and voting -1, then we will assume that you are
> > willing to step up and act as a release manager to get a 2.2.2 release
> out
> > (which would hopefully include being able to not barf on
> maven-metadata.xml
> > that uses the <snapshotVersions> schema generated by Maven 3.x but the
> > release manager gets to decide what it is they want to release)
> >
> > The decision on this is actually quite simple as if there is nobody
> > committer to act as a release manager for the 2.x line, then it is end of
> > life.
> >
> > +1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release manager
> > for this line of releases
> > 0: I have no opinion
> > -1: Maven 2.x is not end of life, I am willing to act as release manager
> > for this line of releases
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72h and may be closed earlier in the unlikely
> > event that all Maven committers have cast a vote before the 72h are up.
> >
> > -Stephen
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Anders Hammar <an...@hammar.net>.
+1
/Anders
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
> We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August 2009.
>
> During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release.
>
> I would argue that we should just therefore just declare Maven 2.x as end
> of life.
>
> This vote is therefore to resolve this issue.
>
> The vote will be decided on the basis of committer votes cast. If the
> majority of votes from committers (which includes PMC members) are in
> favour then we will declare 2.x end of life.
>
> If you are a committer and voting -1, then we will assume that you are
> willing to step up and act as a release manager to get a 2.2.2 release out
> (which would hopefully include being able to not barf on maven-metadata.xml
> that uses the <snapshotVersions> schema generated by Maven 3.x but the
> release manager gets to decide what it is they want to release)
>
> The decision on this is actually quite simple as if there is nobody
> committer to act as a release manager for the 2.x line, then it is end of
> life.
>
> +1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
> 0: I have no opinion
> -1: Maven 2.x is not end of life, I am willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
>
> The vote will be open for 72h and may be closed earlier in the unlikely
> event that all Maven committers have cast a vote before the 72h are up.
>
> -Stephen
>
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Dominik Bartholdi <do...@fortysix.ch>.
+1
> Am 13.02.2014 um 16:14 schrieb Stephen Connolly <st...@gmail.com>:
>
> We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August 2009.
>
> During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release.
>
> I would argue that we should just therefore just declare Maven 2.x as end
> of life.
>
> This vote is therefore to resolve this issue.
>
> The vote will be decided on the basis of committer votes cast. If the
> majority of votes from committers (which includes PMC members) are in
> favour then we will declare 2.x end of life.
>
> If you are a committer and voting -1, then we will assume that you are
> willing to step up and act as a release manager to get a 2.2.2 release out
> (which would hopefully include being able to not barf on maven-metadata.xml
> that uses the <snapshotVersions> schema generated by Maven 3.x but the
> release manager gets to decide what it is they want to release)
>
> The decision on this is actually quite simple as if there is nobody
> committer to act as a release manager for the 2.x line, then it is end of
> life.
>
> +1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
> 0: I have no opinion
> -1: Maven 2.x is not end of life, I am willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
>
> The vote will be open for 72h and may be closed earlier in the unlikely
> event that all Maven committers have cast a vote before the 72h are up.
>
> -Stephen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Stephane Nicoll <st...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
> We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August 2009.
>
> During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release.
>
> I would argue that we should just therefore just declare Maven 2.x as end
> of life.
>
> This vote is therefore to resolve this issue.
>
> The vote will be decided on the basis of committer votes cast. If the
> majority of votes from committers (which includes PMC members) are in
> favour then we will declare 2.x end of life.
>
> If you are a committer and voting -1, then we will assume that you are
> willing to step up and act as a release manager to get a 2.2.2 release out
> (which would hopefully include being able to not barf on maven-metadata.xml
> that uses the <snapshotVersions> schema generated by Maven 3.x but the
> release manager gets to decide what it is they want to release)
>
> The decision on this is actually quite simple as if there is nobody
> committer to act as a release manager for the 2.x line, then it is end of
> life.
>
> +1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
> 0: I have no opinion
> -1: Maven 2.x is not end of life, I am willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
>
> The vote will be open for 72h and may be closed earlier in the unlikely
> event that all Maven committers have cast a vote before the 72h are up.
>
> -Stephen
>
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Wayne Fay <wa...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Stephen Connolly
<st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August 2009.
>
> +1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
Here's my +1.
Wayne
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Tony Chemit <ch...@apache.org>.
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:14:03 +0000
Stephen Connolly <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1
tony.
> We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August 2009.
>
> During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release.
>
> I would argue that we should just therefore just declare Maven 2.x as end
> of life.
>
> This vote is therefore to resolve this issue.
>
> The vote will be decided on the basis of committer votes cast. If the
> majority of votes from committers (which includes PMC members) are in
> favour then we will declare 2.x end of life.
>
> If you are a committer and voting -1, then we will assume that you are
> willing to step up and act as a release manager to get a 2.2.2 release out
> (which would hopefully include being able to not barf on maven-metadata.xml
> that uses the <snapshotVersions> schema generated by Maven 3.x but the
> release manager gets to decide what it is they want to release)
>
> The decision on this is actually quite simple as if there is nobody
> committer to act as a release manager for the 2.x line, then it is end of
> life.
>
> +1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
> 0: I have no opinion
> -1: Maven 2.x is not end of life, I am willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
>
> The vote will be open for 72h and may be closed earlier in the unlikely
> event that all Maven committers have cast a vote before the 72h are up.
>
> -Stephen
--
Tony Chemit
--------------------
tél: +33 (0) 2 40 50 29 28
http://www.codelutin.com
email: chemit@codelutin.com
twitter: https://twitter.com/tchemit
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Michael Osipov <mi...@apache.org>.
+1 with a side remark. For those, who still rely on Maven 2 one should
first annouce an EOL roadmap like this:
1. Make the announcement
2. Release 2.2.2 (only one open ticket in JIRA which can me dismissed)
say 4 weeks later and announce that as the last version of 2.x
3. Encourage to switch to 3.1.x/3.2.x
Take Apache Tomcat as an example, they announced 5.5.x as EOL with
several months in advance. I think, it's unfair to announce something as
EOL straight away.
Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Paul Benedict <pb...@apache.org>.
+1 (non-binding). Glad to see this vote finally take place.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> (forgot my vote)
>
>
> On 13 February 2014 15:14, Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August
> 2009.
> >
> > During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release.
> >
> > I would argue that we should just therefore just declare Maven 2.x as end
> > of life.
> >
> > This vote is therefore to resolve this issue.
> >
> > The vote will be decided on the basis of committer votes cast. If the
> > majority of votes from committers (which includes PMC members) are in
> > favour then we will declare 2.x end of life.
> >
> > If you are a committer and voting -1, then we will assume that you are
> > willing to step up and act as a release manager to get a 2.2.2 release
> out
> > (which would hopefully include being able to not barf on
> maven-metadata.xml
> > that uses the <snapshotVersions> schema generated by Maven 3.x but the
> > release manager gets to decide what it is they want to release)
> >
> > The decision on this is actually quite simple as if there is nobody
> > committer to act as a release manager for the 2.x line, then it is end of
> > life.
> >
> > +1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release manager
> > for this line of releases
> > 0: I have no opinion
> > -1: Maven 2.x is not end of life, I am willing to act as release manager
> > for this line of releases
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72h and may be closed earlier in the unlikely
> > event that all Maven committers have cast a vote before the 72h are up.
> >
> > -Stephen
> >
>
--
Cheers,
Paul
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Stephen Connolly <st...@gmail.com>.
+1
(forgot my vote)
On 13 February 2014 15:14, Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com
> wrote:
> We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August 2009.
>
> During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release.
>
> I would argue that we should just therefore just declare Maven 2.x as end
> of life.
>
> This vote is therefore to resolve this issue.
>
> The vote will be decided on the basis of committer votes cast. If the
> majority of votes from committers (which includes PMC members) are in
> favour then we will declare 2.x end of life.
>
> If you are a committer and voting -1, then we will assume that you are
> willing to step up and act as a release manager to get a 2.2.2 release out
> (which would hopefully include being able to not barf on maven-metadata.xml
> that uses the <snapshotVersions> schema generated by Maven 3.x but the
> release manager gets to decide what it is they want to release)
>
> The decision on this is actually quite simple as if there is nobody
> committer to act as a release manager for the 2.x line, then it is end of
> life.
>
> +1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
> 0: I have no opinion
> -1: Maven 2.x is not end of life, I am willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
>
> The vote will be open for 72h and may be closed earlier in the unlikely
> event that all Maven committers have cast a vote before the 72h are up.
>
> -Stephen
>
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Stephen Connolly
<st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August 2009.
>
> During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release.
>
> I would argue that we should just therefore just declare Maven 2.x as end
> of life.
>
> This vote is therefore to resolve this issue.
>
> The vote will be decided on the basis of committer votes cast. If the
> majority of votes from committers (which includes PMC members) are in
> favour then we will declare 2.x end of life.
>
> If you are a committer and voting -1, then we will assume that you are
> willing to step up and act as a release manager to get a 2.2.2 release out
> (which would hopefully include being able to not barf on maven-metadata.xml
> that uses the <snapshotVersions> schema generated by Maven 3.x but the
> release manager gets to decide what it is they want to release)
>
> The decision on this is actually quite simple as if there is nobody
> committer to act as a release manager for the 2.x line, then it is end of
> life.
>
> +1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
> 0: I have no opinion
> -1: Maven 2.x is not end of life, I am willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
>
> The vote will be open for 72h and may be closed earlier in the unlikely
> event that all Maven committers have cast a vote before the 72h are up.
>
> -Stephen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
non-binding +1
Gary
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
> We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August 2009.
>
> During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release.
>
> I would argue that we should just therefore just declare Maven 2.x as end
> of life.
>
> This vote is therefore to resolve this issue.
>
> The vote will be decided on the basis of committer votes cast. If the
> majority of votes from committers (which includes PMC members) are in
> favour then we will declare 2.x end of life.
>
> If you are a committer and voting -1, then we will assume that you are
> willing to step up and act as a release manager to get a 2.2.2 release out
> (which would hopefully include being able to not barf on maven-metadata.xml
> that uses the <snapshotVersions> schema generated by Maven 3.x but the
> release manager gets to decide what it is they want to release)
>
> The decision on this is actually quite simple as if there is nobody
> committer to act as a release manager for the 2.x line, then it is end of
> life.
>
> +1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
> 0: I have no opinion
> -1: Maven 2.x is not end of life, I am willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
>
> The vote will be open for 72h and may be closed earlier in the unlikely
> event that all Maven committers have cast a vote before the 72h are up.
>
> -Stephen
>
--
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Jörg Schaible <jo...@gmx.de>.
Hi,
Stephen Connolly wrote:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5207
>
> On 13 February 2014 17:15, Baptiste Mathus <ml...@batmat.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jörg,
>> > multi-projects in correct order and therefore will not produce
>> > artifacts
>> with bogus SNAPSHOTs
>>
>> Maybe you could (re)point out the corresponding JIRAs?
>>
>> Because as a maven user, I wonder what triggers these issues for you. We
>> have tens of multi-projects with interdependencies being currently
>> developed, and I'd be interested to hear about the (problematic) use case
>> we don't encounter.
The easiest way to detect if you're affected is by removing any SNAPSHOT
from your repositories and run a build. If the build stops because SNAPSHOTs
cannot be found that are part of your build, the problem is obvious.
- Jörg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Stephen Connolly <st...@gmail.com>.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5207
On 13 February 2014 17:15, Baptiste Mathus <ml...@batmat.net> wrote:
> Hi Jörg,
> > multi-projects in correct order and therefore will not produce artifacts
> with bogus SNAPSHOTs
>
> Maybe you could (re)point out the corresponding JIRAs?
>
> Because as a maven user, I wonder what triggers these issues for you. We
> have tens of multi-projects with interdependencies being currently
> developed, and I'd be interested to hear about the (problematic) use case
> we don't encounter.
>
>
> 2014-02-13 18:05 GMT+01:00 Jörg Schaible <jo...@gmx.de>:
>
> > Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Feb 13, 2014, at 11:18 AM, Stephen Connolly
> > > <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I suggest you convince at least one of these people:
> > >> https://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#maven that they
> > >> should act as release manager.
> > >>
> > >> EOL just means we will not be making new releases, and it will be
> moved
> > >> to the archive section of the downloads.
> > >
> > > Well, one more thing: if it's officially EOL, there is a much higher
> > > chance that plugins would be marked as using 3.x as a minimum and will
> no
> > > longer work with 2.1.1. API's and such that the plugins use will
> likely
> > > get updated to 3.x level. Etc....
> >
> > Right. The question is already if 2.2.1 runs on Java 8 or if we have a
> > compatible release plugin that allows us to switch from subversion to
> git.
> > With EOL of M221 those situations will grow rapidly.
> >
> > > Anyway, I'm +1 to dropping 2.x support.
> >
> > I'd switch immediately to a working 3.x version.
> >
> > >> You will still be able to download it. You will still be able to get
> the
> > >> source code. We just will be recognising the fact that there is nobody
> > >> who wants to cut a release from the 2.x codebase.
> >
> > See above. 2.2.1 can become a dead end faster than wanted.
> >
> > >> Hopefully focusing on the 3.x codebase will allow us to iron out the
> > bugs
> > >> you feel are present in 3.x and thus preventing you from migrating...
> >
> > What else can we do apart from digging into Maven/Aether code ourselves?
> > Providing an example project and an IT did not help to make any progress.
> >
> > - Jörg
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
> >
> > --
> > Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net
> > Sauvez un arbre,
> > Mangez un castor ! nbsp;! <de...@maven.apache.org>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Baptiste Mathus <ml...@batmat.net>.
Hi Jörg,
> multi-projects in correct order and therefore will not produce artifacts
with bogus SNAPSHOTs
Maybe you could (re)point out the corresponding JIRAs?
Because as a maven user, I wonder what triggers these issues for you. We
have tens of multi-projects with interdependencies being currently
developed, and I'd be interested to hear about the (problematic) use case
we don't encounter.
2014-02-13 18:05 GMT+01:00 Jörg Schaible <jo...@gmx.de>:
> Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> >
> > On Feb 13, 2014, at 11:18 AM, Stephen Connolly
> > <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I suggest you convince at least one of these people:
> >> https://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#maven that they
> >> should act as release manager.
> >>
> >> EOL just means we will not be making new releases, and it will be moved
> >> to the archive section of the downloads.
> >
> > Well, one more thing: if it’s officially EOL, there is a much higher
> > chance that plugins would be marked as using 3.x as a minimum and will no
> > longer work with 2.1.1. API’s and such that the plugins use will likely
> > get updated to 3.x level. Etc….
>
> Right. The question is already if 2.2.1 runs on Java 8 or if we have a
> compatible release plugin that allows us to switch from subversion to git.
> With EOL of M221 those situations will grow rapidly.
>
> > Anyway, I’m +1 to dropping 2.x support.
>
> I'd switch immediately to a working 3.x version.
>
> >> You will still be able to download it. You will still be able to get the
> >> source code. We just will be recognising the fact that there is nobody
> >> who wants to cut a release from the 2.x codebase.
>
> See above. 2.2.1 can become a dead end faster than wanted.
>
> >> Hopefully focusing on the 3.x codebase will allow us to iron out the
> bugs
> >> you feel are present in 3.x and thus preventing you from migrating...
>
> What else can we do apart from digging into Maven/Aether code ourselves?
> Providing an example project and an IT did not help to make any progress.
>
> - Jörg
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
> --
> Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net
> Sauvez un arbre,
> Mangez un castor ! nbsp;! <de...@maven.apache.org>
>
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Jörg Schaible <jo...@gmx.de>.
Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2014, at 11:18 AM, Stephen Connolly
> <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I suggest you convince at least one of these people:
>> https://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#maven that they
>> should act as release manager.
>>
>> EOL just means we will not be making new releases, and it will be moved
>> to the archive section of the downloads.
>
> Well, one more thing: if it’s officially EOL, there is a much higher
> chance that plugins would be marked as using 3.x as a minimum and will no
> longer work with 2.1.1. API’s and such that the plugins use will likely
> get updated to 3.x level. Etc….
Right. The question is already if 2.2.1 runs on Java 8 or if we have a
compatible release plugin that allows us to switch from subversion to git.
With EOL of M221 those situations will grow rapidly.
> Anyway, I’m +1 to dropping 2.x support.
I'd switch immediately to a working 3.x version.
>> You will still be able to download it. You will still be able to get the
>> source code. We just will be recognising the fact that there is nobody
>> who wants to cut a release from the 2.x codebase.
See above. 2.2.1 can become a dead end faster than wanted.
>> Hopefully focusing on the 3.x codebase will allow us to iron out the bugs
>> you feel are present in 3.x and thus preventing you from migrating...
What else can we do apart from digging into Maven/Aether code ourselves?
Providing an example project and an IT did not help to make any progress.
- Jörg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Feb 13, 2014, at 11:18 AM, Stephen Connolly <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I suggest you convince at least one of these people:
> https://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#maven that they should
> act as release manager.
>
> EOL just means we will not be making new releases, and it will be moved to
> the archive section of the downloads.
Well, one more thing: if it’s officially EOL, there is a much higher chance that plugins would be marked as using 3.x as a minimum and will no longer work with 2.1.1. API’s and such that the plugins use will likely get updated to 3.x level. Etc….
Anyway, I’m +1 to dropping 2.x support.
Dan
>
> You will still be able to download it. You will still be able to get the
> source code. We just will be recognising the fact that there is nobody who
> wants to cut a release from the 2.x codebase.
>
> Hopefully focusing on the 3.x codebase will allow us to iron out the bugs
> you feel are present in 3.x and thus preventing you from migrating... but
> if there are any committers who want to cut 2.x releases, I - as a PMC
> member - will certainly stand up and do what is required in terms of
> testing the source bundle and checking the IP etc... I don't see any
> committers standing up.
>
> If the vote is for EOL and after this vote there is a committer who wants
> to act as release manager for 2.x, we will not stop them from releasing
> either... we will just stop putting 2.x on the active downloads page
>
>
> On 13 February 2014 15:52, Jörg Schaible <jo...@swisspost.com>wrote:
>
>> Stephen Connolly wrote:
>>
>>> We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August
>> 2009.
>>>
>>> During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release.
>>>
>>> I would argue that we should just therefore just declare Maven 2.x as end
>>> of life.
>>
>> -1
>>
>> This vote is real-life comedy as long as there is no newer version that
>> succeeds with its core competence to build multi-projects in correct order
>> and therefore will not produce artifacts with bogus SNAPSHOTs.
>>
>> Embarassed,
>> Jörg
>>
>>>
>>> This vote is therefore to resolve this issue.
>>>
>>> The vote will be decided on the basis of committer votes cast. If the
>>> majority of votes from committers (which includes PMC members) are in
>>> favour then we will declare 2.x end of life.
>>>
>>> If you are a committer and voting -1, then we will assume that you are
>>> willing to step up and act as a release manager to get a 2.2.2 release
>> out
>>> (which would hopefully include being able to not barf on
>>> maven-metadata.xml that uses the <snapshotVersions> schema generated by
>>> Maven 3.x but the release manager gets to decide what it is they want to
>>> release)
>>>
>>> The decision on this is actually quite simple as if there is nobody
>>> committer to act as a release manager for the 2.x line, then it is end of
>>> life.
>>>
>>> +1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release manager
>>> for this line of releases
>>> 0: I have no opinion
>>> -1: Maven 2.x is not end of life, I am willing to act as release manager
>>> for this line of releases
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for 72h and may be closed earlier in the unlikely
>>> event that all Maven committers have cast a vote before the 72h are up.
>>>
>>> -Stephen
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>>
>>
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Stephen Connolly <st...@gmail.com>.
I suggest you convince at least one of these people:
https://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#maven that they should
act as release manager.
EOL just means we will not be making new releases, and it will be moved to
the archive section of the downloads.
You will still be able to download it. You will still be able to get the
source code. We just will be recognising the fact that there is nobody who
wants to cut a release from the 2.x codebase.
Hopefully focusing on the 3.x codebase will allow us to iron out the bugs
you feel are present in 3.x and thus preventing you from migrating... but
if there are any committers who want to cut 2.x releases, I - as a PMC
member - will certainly stand up and do what is required in terms of
testing the source bundle and checking the IP etc... I don't see any
committers standing up.
If the vote is for EOL and after this vote there is a committer who wants
to act as release manager for 2.x, we will not stop them from releasing
either... we will just stop putting 2.x on the active downloads page
On 13 February 2014 15:52, Jörg Schaible <jo...@swisspost.com>wrote:
> Stephen Connolly wrote:
>
> > We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August
> 2009.
> >
> > During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release.
> >
> > I would argue that we should just therefore just declare Maven 2.x as end
> > of life.
>
> -1
>
> This vote is real-life comedy as long as there is no newer version that
> succeeds with its core competence to build multi-projects in correct order
> and therefore will not produce artifacts with bogus SNAPSHOTs.
>
> Embarassed,
> Jörg
>
> >
> > This vote is therefore to resolve this issue.
> >
> > The vote will be decided on the basis of committer votes cast. If the
> > majority of votes from committers (which includes PMC members) are in
> > favour then we will declare 2.x end of life.
> >
> > If you are a committer and voting -1, then we will assume that you are
> > willing to step up and act as a release manager to get a 2.2.2 release
> out
> > (which would hopefully include being able to not barf on
> > maven-metadata.xml that uses the <snapshotVersions> schema generated by
> > Maven 3.x but the release manager gets to decide what it is they want to
> > release)
> >
> > The decision on this is actually quite simple as if there is nobody
> > committer to act as a release manager for the 2.x line, then it is end of
> > life.
> >
> > +1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release manager
> > for this line of releases
> > 0: I have no opinion
> > -1: Maven 2.x is not end of life, I am willing to act as release manager
> > for this line of releases
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72h and may be closed earlier in the unlikely
> > event that all Maven committers have cast a vote before the 72h are up.
> >
> > -Stephen
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Jörg Schaible <jo...@swisspost.com>.
Stephen Connolly wrote:
> We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August 2009.
>
> During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release.
>
> I would argue that we should just therefore just declare Maven 2.x as end
> of life.
-1
This vote is real-life comedy as long as there is no newer version that
succeeds with its core competence to build multi-projects in correct order
and therefore will not produce artifacts with bogus SNAPSHOTs.
Embarassed,
Jörg
>
> This vote is therefore to resolve this issue.
>
> The vote will be decided on the basis of committer votes cast. If the
> majority of votes from committers (which includes PMC members) are in
> favour then we will declare 2.x end of life.
>
> If you are a committer and voting -1, then we will assume that you are
> willing to step up and act as a release manager to get a 2.2.2 release out
> (which would hopefully include being able to not barf on
> maven-metadata.xml that uses the <snapshotVersions> schema generated by
> Maven 3.x but the release manager gets to decide what it is they want to
> release)
>
> The decision on this is actually quite simple as if there is nobody
> committer to act as a release manager for the 2.x line, then it is end of
> life.
>
> +1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
> 0: I have no opinion
> -1: Maven 2.x is not end of life, I am willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
>
> The vote will be open for 72h and may be closed earlier in the unlikely
> event that all Maven committers have cast a vote before the 72h are up.
>
> -Stephen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Chris Graham <ch...@gmail.com>.
+1
PS: like your style mark!
-Chris
Sent from my iPhone
On 16/02/2014, at 2:11 PM, "Mark Derricutt" <ma...@talios.com> wrote:
> On 14 Feb 2014, at 4:14, Stephen Connolly wrote:
>
>> +1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release manager
>> for this line of releases
>> 0: I have no opinion
>> -1: Maven 2.x is not end of life, I am willing to act as release manager
>> for this line of releases
>
>
> +1
>
> In the word of Rob Halford and his short lived FIGHT band project:
>
> o/~ KILL IT KILL IT KILL IT
> o/~ KILL!
> o/~ IT!
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cK1HP5eKEU0
>
> Mark
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Mark Derricutt <ma...@talios.com>.
On 14 Feb 2014, at 4:14, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> +1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
> 0: I have no opinion
> -1: Maven 2.x is not end of life, I am willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
+1
In the word of Rob Halford and his short lived FIGHT band project:
o/~ KILL IT KILL IT KILL IT
o/~ KILL!
o/~ IT!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cK1HP5eKEU0
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Karl Heinz Marbaise <kh...@gmx.de>.
+1 from me as well.
Kind regards
Karl-Heinz Marbaise
> We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August
2009.
>
> During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release.
>
> I would argue that we should just therefore just declare Maven 2.x as end
> of life.
>
> This vote is therefore to resolve this issue.
>
> The vote will be decided on the basis of committer votes cast. If the
> majority of votes from committers (which includes PMC members) are in
> favour then we will declare 2.x end of life.
>
> If you are a committer and voting -1, then we will assume that you are
> willing to step up and act as a release manager to get a 2.2.2 release out
> (which would hopefully include being able to not barf on maven-metadata.xml
> that uses the <snapshotVersions> schema generated by Maven 3.x but the
> release manager gets to decide what it is they want to release)
>
> The decision on this is actually quite simple as if there is nobody
> committer to act as a release manager for the 2.x line, then it is end of
> life.
>
> +1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
> 0: I have no opinion
> -1: Maven 2.x is not end of life, I am willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
>
> The vote will be open for 72h and may be closed earlier in the unlikely
> event that all Maven committers have cast a vote before the 72h are up.
>
> -Stephen
>
Mit freundlichem Gruß
Karl-Heinz Marbaise
--
SoftwareEntwicklung Beratung Schulung Tel.: +49 (0) 2405 / 415 893
Dipl.Ing.(FH) Karl-Heinz Marbaise ICQ#: 135949029
Hauptstrasse 177 USt.IdNr: DE191347579
52146 Würselen http://www.soebes.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
+1
LieGrue,
strub
On Thursday, 13 February 2014, 18:42, Andreas Gudian <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1
>
>:-)
>
>Am Donnerstag, 13. Februar 2014 schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY :
>
>> +1
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hervé
>>
>> Le jeudi 13 février 2014 15:14:03 Stephen Connolly a écrit :
>> > We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August
>> 2009.
>> >
>> > During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release.
>> >
>> > I would argue that we should just therefore just declare Maven 2.x as end
>> > of life.
>> >
>> > This vote is therefore to resolve this issue.
>> >
>> > The vote will be decided on the basis of committer votes cast. If the
>> > majority of votes from committers (which includes PMC members) are in
>> > favour then we will declare 2.x end of life.
>> >
>> > If you are a committer and voting -1, then we will assume that you are
>> > willing to step up and act as a release manager to get a 2.2.2 release
>> out
>> > (which would hopefully include being able to not barf on
>> maven-metadata.xml
>> > that uses the <snapshotVersions> schema generated by Maven 3.x but the
>> > release manager gets to decide what it is they want to release)
>> >
>> > The decision on this is actually quite simple as if there is nobody
>> > committer to act as a release manager for the 2.x line, then it is end of
>> > life.
>> >
>> > +1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release manager
>> > for this line of releases
>> > 0: I have no opinion
>> > -1: Maven 2.x is not end of life, I am willing to act as release manager
>> > for this line of releases
>> >
>> > The vote will be open for 72h and may be closed earlier in the unlikely
>> > event that all Maven committers have cast a vote before the 72h are up.
>> >
>> > -Stephen
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org <javascript:;>
>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
<javascript:;>
>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Andreas Gudian <an...@gmail.com>.
+1
:-)
Am Donnerstag, 13. Februar 2014 schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY :
> +1
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le jeudi 13 février 2014 15:14:03 Stephen Connolly a écrit :
> > We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August
> 2009.
> >
> > During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release.
> >
> > I would argue that we should just therefore just declare Maven 2.x as end
> > of life.
> >
> > This vote is therefore to resolve this issue.
> >
> > The vote will be decided on the basis of committer votes cast. If the
> > majority of votes from committers (which includes PMC members) are in
> > favour then we will declare 2.x end of life.
> >
> > If you are a committer and voting -1, then we will assume that you are
> > willing to step up and act as a release manager to get a 2.2.2 release
> out
> > (which would hopefully include being able to not barf on
> maven-metadata.xml
> > that uses the <snapshotVersions> schema generated by Maven 3.x but the
> > release manager gets to decide what it is they want to release)
> >
> > The decision on this is actually quite simple as if there is nobody
> > committer to act as a release manager for the 2.x line, then it is end of
> > life.
> >
> > +1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release manager
> > for this line of releases
> > 0: I have no opinion
> > -1: Maven 2.x is not end of life, I am willing to act as release manager
> > for this line of releases
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72h and may be closed earlier in the unlikely
> > event that all Maven committers have cast a vote before the 72h are up.
> >
> > -Stephen
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org <javascript:;>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org <javascript:;>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr>.
+1
Regards,
Hervé
Le jeudi 13 février 2014 15:14:03 Stephen Connolly a écrit :
> We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August 2009.
>
> During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release.
>
> I would argue that we should just therefore just declare Maven 2.x as end
> of life.
>
> This vote is therefore to resolve this issue.
>
> The vote will be decided on the basis of committer votes cast. If the
> majority of votes from committers (which includes PMC members) are in
> favour then we will declare 2.x end of life.
>
> If you are a committer and voting -1, then we will assume that you are
> willing to step up and act as a release manager to get a 2.2.2 release out
> (which would hopefully include being able to not barf on maven-metadata.xml
> that uses the <snapshotVersions> schema generated by Maven 3.x but the
> release manager gets to decide what it is they want to release)
>
> The decision on this is actually quite simple as if there is nobody
> committer to act as a release manager for the 2.x line, then it is end of
> life.
>
> +1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
> 0: I have no opinion
> -1: Maven 2.x is not end of life, I am willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
>
> The vote will be open for 72h and may be closed earlier in the unlikely
> event that all Maven committers have cast a vote before the 72h are up.
>
> -Stephen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Kristian Rosenvold <kr...@gmail.com>.
+1
14. feb. 2014 01:32 skrev "Olivier Lamy" <ol...@apache.org> følgende:
> +1
>
> On 14 February 2014 02:14, Stephen Connolly
> <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August
> 2009.
> >
> > During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release.
> >
> > I would argue that we should just therefore just declare Maven 2.x as end
> > of life.
> >
> > This vote is therefore to resolve this issue.
> >
> > The vote will be decided on the basis of committer votes cast. If the
> > majority of votes from committers (which includes PMC members) are in
> > favour then we will declare 2.x end of life.
> >
> > If you are a committer and voting -1, then we will assume that you are
> > willing to step up and act as a release manager to get a 2.2.2 release
> out
> > (which would hopefully include being able to not barf on
> maven-metadata.xml
> > that uses the <snapshotVersions> schema generated by Maven 3.x but the
> > release manager gets to decide what it is they want to release)
> >
> > The decision on this is actually quite simple as if there is nobody
> > committer to act as a release manager for the 2.x line, then it is end of
> > life.
> >
> > +1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release manager
> > for this line of releases
> > 0: I have no opinion
> > -1: Maven 2.x is not end of life, I am willing to act as release manager
> > for this line of releases
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72h and may be closed earlier in the unlikely
> > event that all Maven committers have cast a vote before the 72h are up.
> >
> > -Stephen
>
>
>
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Kristian Rosenvold <kr...@gmail.com>.
+1
2014-02-14 10:17 GMT+01:00 Arnaud Héritier <ah...@gmail.com>:
> +1
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On 14 February 2014 02:14, Stephen Connolly
> > <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August
> > 2009.
> > >
> > > During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release.
> > >
> > > I would argue that we should just therefore just declare Maven 2.x as
> end
> > > of life.
> > >
> > > This vote is therefore to resolve this issue.
> > >
> > > The vote will be decided on the basis of committer votes cast. If the
> > > majority of votes from committers (which includes PMC members) are in
> > > favour then we will declare 2.x end of life.
> > >
> > > If you are a committer and voting -1, then we will assume that you are
> > > willing to step up and act as a release manager to get a 2.2.2 release
> > out
> > > (which would hopefully include being able to not barf on
> > maven-metadata.xml
> > > that uses the <snapshotVersions> schema generated by Maven 3.x but the
> > > release manager gets to decide what it is they want to release)
> > >
> > > The decision on this is actually quite simple as if there is nobody
> > > committer to act as a release manager for the 2.x line, then it is end
> of
> > > life.
> > >
> > > +1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release
> manager
> > > for this line of releases
> > > 0: I have no opinion
> > > -1: Maven 2.x is not end of life, I am willing to act as release
> manager
> > > for this line of releases
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for 72h and may be closed earlier in the unlikely
> > > event that all Maven committers have cast a vote before the 72h are up.
> > >
> > > -Stephen
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Olivier Lamy
> > Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
> > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> -----
> Arnaud Héritier
> http://aheritier.net
> Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com
> Twitter/Skype : aheritier
>
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Arnaud Héritier <ah...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On 14 February 2014 02:14, Stephen Connolly
> <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August
> 2009.
> >
> > During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release.
> >
> > I would argue that we should just therefore just declare Maven 2.x as end
> > of life.
> >
> > This vote is therefore to resolve this issue.
> >
> > The vote will be decided on the basis of committer votes cast. If the
> > majority of votes from committers (which includes PMC members) are in
> > favour then we will declare 2.x end of life.
> >
> > If you are a committer and voting -1, then we will assume that you are
> > willing to step up and act as a release manager to get a 2.2.2 release
> out
> > (which would hopefully include being able to not barf on
> maven-metadata.xml
> > that uses the <snapshotVersions> schema generated by Maven 3.x but the
> > release manager gets to decide what it is they want to release)
> >
> > The decision on this is actually quite simple as if there is nobody
> > committer to act as a release manager for the 2.x line, then it is end of
> > life.
> >
> > +1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release manager
> > for this line of releases
> > 0: I have no opinion
> > -1: Maven 2.x is not end of life, I am willing to act as release manager
> > for this line of releases
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72h and may be closed earlier in the unlikely
> > event that all Maven committers have cast a vote before the 72h are up.
> >
> > -Stephen
>
>
>
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
--
-----
Arnaud Héritier
http://aheritier.net
Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com
Twitter/Skype : aheritier
Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life
Posted by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
+1
On 14 February 2014 02:14, Stephen Connolly
<st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August 2009.
>
> During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release.
>
> I would argue that we should just therefore just declare Maven 2.x as end
> of life.
>
> This vote is therefore to resolve this issue.
>
> The vote will be decided on the basis of committer votes cast. If the
> majority of votes from committers (which includes PMC members) are in
> favour then we will declare 2.x end of life.
>
> If you are a committer and voting -1, then we will assume that you are
> willing to step up and act as a release manager to get a 2.2.2 release out
> (which would hopefully include being able to not barf on maven-metadata.xml
> that uses the <snapshotVersions> schema generated by Maven 3.x but the
> release manager gets to decide what it is they want to release)
>
> The decision on this is actually quite simple as if there is nobody
> committer to act as a release manager for the 2.x line, then it is end of
> life.
>
> +1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
> 0: I have no opinion
> -1: Maven 2.x is not end of life, I am willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
>
> The vote will be open for 72h and may be closed earlier in the unlikely
> event that all Maven committers have cast a vote before the 72h are up.
>
> -Stephen
--
Olivier Lamy
Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org