[GitHub] [druid] cryptoe commented on pull request #13928: Undocumenting certain context parameter in MSQ.

["cryptoe (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>]

cryptoe commented on PR #13928:
URL: https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/13928#issuecomment-1469444648

   > Can we move this information into a Javadoc comment in the config class for these items? Then, at least developers will have the information and it won't be lost.
   
   I like that proposal better. Just added some comments in `MultiStageQueryContext` class.  


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@druid.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@druid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-help@druid.apache.org