You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@commons.apache.org by Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org> on 2006/04/16 09:55:29 UTC
[jelly] Re: Jelly to use new Jexl ?
I have to say that I'd rather say it's good for jelly to have these
features available.
Loops shouldn't be a poblem.
As for assignments, as far as I know, jelly always makes the context as
a member so that assignment is not disabled. It could be an issue to
folks who clear the context variable of the context.
Does anyone do so ?
paul
Dion Gillard wrote:
> There are things in the new release of Jexl that Jelly may or may not
> want to pick up, e.g. assignment to variables, foreach/while
> statements etc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [jelly] Re: Jelly to use new Jexl ?
Posted by Dion Gillard <di...@gmail.com>.
Possible, yes.
Assignment in Jexl 1.0 is legal, parsed successfully, but does nothing.
On 4/19/06, Hans Gilde <hg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> JSP has multiple ways to do variable assignment (similar to using tags
> versus Jexl) and people seem to handle picking the right one.
>
> Would it be possible, though, to break some existing code that
> accidentally
> has an assignment that is not currently processed? From a couple of tests,
> it doesn't seem to me that this would be a problem.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:paul@activemath.org]
> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 3:55 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Users List
> Subject: [jelly] Re: Jelly to use new Jexl ?
>
> I have to say that I'd rather say it's good for jelly to have these
> features available.
> Loops shouldn't be a poblem.
>
> As for assignments, as far as I know, jelly always makes the context as
> a member so that assignment is not disabled. It could be an issue to
> folks who clear the context variable of the context.
> Does anyone do so ?
>
> paul
>
>
> Dion Gillard wrote:
> > There are things in the new release of Jexl that Jelly may or may not
> > want to pick up, e.g. assignment to variables, foreach/while
> > statements etc.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is afraid
of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris
Re: [jelly] Re: Jelly to use new Jexl ?
Posted by Dion Gillard <di...@gmail.com>.
okay by me, I was just making sure that we all understood what the latest
Jexl brings.
On 4/16/06, Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org> wrote:
>
> I have to say that I'd rather say it's good for jelly to have these
> features available.
> Loops shouldn't be a poblem.
>
> As for assignments, as far as I know, jelly always makes the context as
> a member so that assignment is not disabled. It could be an issue to
> folks who clear the context variable of the context.
> Does anyone do so ?
>
> paul
>
>
> Dion Gillard wrote:
> > There are things in the new release of Jexl that Jelly may or may not
> > want to pick up, e.g. assignment to variables, foreach/while
> > statements etc.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is afraid
of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris
RE: [jelly] Re: Jelly to use new Jexl ?
Posted by Hans Gilde <hg...@gmail.com>.
JSP has multiple ways to do variable assignment (similar to using tags
versus Jexl) and people seem to handle picking the right one.
Would it be possible, though, to break some existing code that accidentally
has an assignment that is not currently processed? From a couple of tests,
it doesn't seem to me that this would be a problem.
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:paul@activemath.org]
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 3:55 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Users List
Subject: [jelly] Re: Jelly to use new Jexl ?
I have to say that I'd rather say it's good for jelly to have these
features available.
Loops shouldn't be a poblem.
As for assignments, as far as I know, jelly always makes the context as
a member so that assignment is not disabled. It could be an issue to
folks who clear the context variable of the context.
Does anyone do so ?
paul
Dion Gillard wrote:
> There are things in the new release of Jexl that Jelly may or may not
> want to pick up, e.g. assignment to variables, foreach/while
> statements etc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org