You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@gmail.com> on 2008/05/16 14:49:55 UTC

[jsieve] 0.2 is fine by me [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] Let's release jsieve 0.2]

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>
>> IMHO the first (but mysteriously 0.2) jsieve release is well overdue.
>> unless anyone else jump in, i'll act as release manager.
>>
>> note that this is a proposal, not a release vote. i would like to be
>> confident that there are at least 3 people who are actively in favour
>> (and so willing to review the artifact) and no major objections.
>>
>> shall we try to release jsieve 0.2?
>>
>> - robert
>
> +1
>
> Stefano
>
> PS: about the release number, feel free to propose any different number,
> IMHO we can change it if needed. I don't have strong preferences about
> another version because I don't understand the real completeness and
> stability of jsieve.

0.2 is fine by me

- robert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org