[jira] [Work logged] (CRYPTO-149) testGcmTamperedData() in GCMCipherTest Intermittent Failure

["ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRYPTO-149?focusedWorklogId=468329&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-468329 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on CRYPTO-149:
-----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 09/Aug/20 13:27
            Start Date: 09/Aug/20 13:27
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: aremily opened a new pull request #105:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-crypto/pull/105


   Fixes the test bug by restricting the initialization vector length to only valid values.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

            Worklog Id:     (was: 468329)
    Remaining Estimate: 0h
            Time Spent: 10m

> testGcmTamperedData() in GCMCipherTest Intermittent Failure
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CRYPTO-149
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRYPTO-149
>             Project: Commons Crypto
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Cipher
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 1.1.0
>            Reporter: Alex Remily
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.1.0
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Gary Gregory 
> Aug 5, 2020, 10:53 PM (20 hours ago)
> to Commons
> Hi All:
> I am seeing what may be a random AEADBadTagException in GcmCipherTest?
> For example:
> [ERROR] testGcmTamperedData(org.apache.commons.crypto.cipher.GcmCipherTest)
>  Time elapsed: 0.015 s  <<< ERROR!
> 881java.lang.Exception: Unexpected exception,
> expected<javax.crypto.AEADBadTagException> but
> was<java.lang.InternalError>
> 882     at org.apache.commons.crypto.cipher.GcmCipherTest.testGcmTamperedData(GcmCipherTest.java:224)
> 883
> 884
> Any thoughts?
> The above is from
> https://travis-ci.org/github/apache/commons-crypto/jobs/715348986
> Gary
> Alex Remily 
> 8:10 AM (11 hours ago)
> to Commons
> That is an intermittent issue that I haven't been able to reliably reproduce.  As I recall, the test that's failing is supposed to fail, but in a different way.  I think it's supposed to fail because of a short buffer but occasionally fails because of an internal error, and when that happens this test fails.  I don't know when it was introduced.  We should probably document it in jira and or realese notes.
> Matt Sicker 
> 10:33 AM (8 hours ago)
> to Commons
> Now I hope we don't have unit tests depending on non-static state for
> its random number generator! ;) I'd expect a crypto library's test
> suites to include several hard-coded known-good and known-bad
> ciphertexts with static keys/IVs similar to the test cases presented
> in their RFCs (especially since said tests are typically small enough
> to copy/paste the binary data fairly easily).
> --
> Matt Sicker 
> Rob Tompkins 
> 10:37 AM (8 hours ago)
> to Commons
> We actually do have a considerable number of those in our projects where we use probabilistic epsilons on the output. See commons-rng. Note, Gilles is quite good at writing such tests.
> -Rob
> Matt Sicker 
> 10:42 AM (8 hours ago)
> to Commons
> Well, for testing RNGs, I can understand using property testing, yes.
> It would also be useful for testing fuzzing scenarios like making sure
> the GCM tag is invalid for any random input data (giving a near zero
> probability of valid data) or that an elliptic curve implementation
> doesn't leak out information about points outside the curve or respond
> to invalid inputs improperly or things like that.
> Rob Tompkins 
> 10:50 AM (8 hours ago)
> to Commons
> +1 - the elliptic curve stuff I’ll have to defer to you on as I’m less a number theorist and more of a logician.
> -Rob
> Gary Gregory  
> 10:56 AM (8 hours ago)
> to Commons
> This is all fine and good but how would you fix the test such that it does
> not fail randomly. PR anyone?
> Gary
> Rob Tompkins 
> 10:57 AM (8 hours ago)
> to Commons
> Either static inputs for determinism, or putting a probabilistic boundary in which the solution can fall.
> -Rob
> Matt Sicker 
> 11:00 AM (8 hours ago)
> to Commons
> Choose a seed value for the `new Random()` constructor and the tests
> will be deterministic.
> Matt Sicker 
> 11:02 AM (8 hours ago)
> to Commons
> Or alternatively, if using random values each time, have it retry the
> test with a different value. It's typically better to use an actual
> property testing library for these types of tests anyways. One example
> library I found is https://jqwik.net/ (these types of testing
> libraries are more common in functional programming like in Scala).
> Rob Tompkins 
> 11:03 AM (8 hours ago)
> to Commons
> Precisely. That’s another technique we’ve used in rng.
> -Ropb



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)