Differences between AMQ 4.1.1 and 5.3.2

[Stephen Nabres <be...@hotmail.com>]

Hi everyone,

I have a client who's using ActiveMQ 4.1.1 but they're thinging of migrating
to the latest ActiveMQ version. I'd like to be able to explain to them the
clear advantages of 5.x over 4.x but I don't have enough experience with
ActiveMQ to be able to point those out. 

Could anyone please list a few major improvements/advantages/problems solved
in 5.x over 4.x? 
Many thanks in advance!

Stephen Nabres

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Differences-between-AMQ-4.1.1-and-5.3.2-tp28971921p28971921.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Differences between AMQ 4.1.1 and 5.3.2

[Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com>]

I would use at least 5.3.2 -

5.x has a faster default persistent storage - but the main difference is there no overhead on the depth of Queues to broker memory.

cheers,

Rob

Rob Davies
follow me: http://twitter.com/rajdavies
I work here: http://fusesource.com
My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/



On 23 Jun 2010, at 14:33, Stephen Nabres wrote:

> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I have a client who's using ActiveMQ 4.1.1 but they're thinging of migrating
> to the latest ActiveMQ version. I'd like to be able to explain to them the
> clear advantages of 5.x over 4.x but I don't have enough experience with
> ActiveMQ to be able to point those out. 
> 
> Could anyone please list a few major improvements/advantages/problems solved
> in 5.x over 4.x? 
> Many thanks in advance!
> 
> Stephen Nabres
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Differences-between-AMQ-4.1.1-and-5.3.2-tp28971921p28971921.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>