You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-user@hadoop.apache.org by Visioner Sadak <vi...@gmail.com> on 2012/10/10 16:49:33 UTC
0.22.0 version
can 0.22.0 version be used in prod,i needed symlink support and hdfsproxy
at the same time ...thts why have to downgrade no option
Re: 0.22.0 version
Posted by Visioner Sadak <vi...@gmail.com>.
thanks robert i think i will have have to cross my fingers and go ahead
with 0.23.3 to get all the features tht i need :) if i dunt get any show
stoppers
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Robert Molina <rm...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
> I believe not many folks have deployed it. Although some testing has been
> done it may not be stable. If you are really stuck on using that release,
> you can check on the release notes and bugs filed for that version to see
> if there are any potential show stoppers for you. As always, test as much
> as possible.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Visioner Sadak <vi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> can 0.22.0 version be used in prod,i needed symlink support and hdfsproxy
>> at the same time ...thts why have to downgrade no option
>
>
>
Re: 0.22.0 version
Posted by Visioner Sadak <vi...@gmail.com>.
thanks robert i think i will have have to cross my fingers and go ahead
with 0.23.3 to get all the features tht i need :) if i dunt get any show
stoppers
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Robert Molina <rm...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
> I believe not many folks have deployed it. Although some testing has been
> done it may not be stable. If you are really stuck on using that release,
> you can check on the release notes and bugs filed for that version to see
> if there are any potential show stoppers for you. As always, test as much
> as possible.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Visioner Sadak <vi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> can 0.22.0 version be used in prod,i needed symlink support and hdfsproxy
>> at the same time ...thts why have to downgrade no option
>
>
>
Re: 0.22.0 version
Posted by Visioner Sadak <vi...@gmail.com>.
thanks robert i think i will have have to cross my fingers and go ahead
with 0.23.3 to get all the features tht i need :) if i dunt get any show
stoppers
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Robert Molina <rm...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
> I believe not many folks have deployed it. Although some testing has been
> done it may not be stable. If you are really stuck on using that release,
> you can check on the release notes and bugs filed for that version to see
> if there are any potential show stoppers for you. As always, test as much
> as possible.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Visioner Sadak <vi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> can 0.22.0 version be used in prod,i needed symlink support and hdfsproxy
>> at the same time ...thts why have to downgrade no option
>
>
>
Re: 0.22.0 version
Posted by Visioner Sadak <vi...@gmail.com>.
thanks robert i think i will have have to cross my fingers and go ahead
with 0.23.3 to get all the features tht i need :) if i dunt get any show
stoppers
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Robert Molina <rm...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
> I believe not many folks have deployed it. Although some testing has been
> done it may not be stable. If you are really stuck on using that release,
> you can check on the release notes and bugs filed for that version to see
> if there are any potential show stoppers for you. As always, test as much
> as possible.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Visioner Sadak <vi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> can 0.22.0 version be used in prod,i needed symlink support and hdfsproxy
>> at the same time ...thts why have to downgrade no option
>
>
>
Re: 0.22.0 version
Posted by Robert Molina <rm...@hortonworks.com>.
I believe not many folks have deployed it. Although some testing has been
done it may not be stable. If you are really stuck on using that release,
you can check on the release notes and bugs filed for that version to see
if there are any potential show stoppers for you. As always, test as much
as possible.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Visioner Sadak <vi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> can 0.22.0 version be used in prod,i needed symlink support and hdfsproxy
> at the same time ...thts why have to downgrade no option
Re: 0.22.0 version
Posted by Robert Molina <rm...@hortonworks.com>.
I believe not many folks have deployed it. Although some testing has been
done it may not be stable. If you are really stuck on using that release,
you can check on the release notes and bugs filed for that version to see
if there are any potential show stoppers for you. As always, test as much
as possible.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Visioner Sadak <vi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> can 0.22.0 version be used in prod,i needed symlink support and hdfsproxy
> at the same time ...thts why have to downgrade no option
Re: 0.22.0 version
Posted by Robert Molina <rm...@hortonworks.com>.
I believe not many folks have deployed it. Although some testing has been
done it may not be stable. If you are really stuck on using that release,
you can check on the release notes and bugs filed for that version to see
if there are any potential show stoppers for you. As always, test as much
as possible.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Visioner Sadak <vi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> can 0.22.0 version be used in prod,i needed symlink support and hdfsproxy
> at the same time ...thts why have to downgrade no option
Re: 0.22.0 version
Posted by Robert Molina <rm...@hortonworks.com>.
I believe not many folks have deployed it. Although some testing has been
done it may not be stable. If you are really stuck on using that release,
you can check on the release notes and bugs filed for that version to see
if there are any potential show stoppers for you. As always, test as much
as possible.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Visioner Sadak <vi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> can 0.22.0 version be used in prod,i needed symlink support and hdfsproxy
> at the same time ...thts why have to downgrade no option