You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@isis.apache.org by "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/03/01 07:14:18 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (ISIS-993) Show different object members on multiple tabs

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15173288#comment-15173288 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on ISIS-993:
------------------------------------------------------

Commit e417a8ab5984393394113066a7ad1ea8379bcab2 in isis's branch refs/heads/ISIS-993 from [~danhaywood]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=isis.git;h=e417a8a ]

ISIS-993: ensure that actions associated to properties/collections/fieldsets are added in the correct order when normalizing grid.


> Show different object members on multiple tabs
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ISIS-993
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-993
>             Project: Isis
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Core, Core: Viewer: Wicket
>    Affects Versions: viewer-wicket-1.7.0
>            Reporter: Dan Haywood
>            Assignee: Dan Haywood
>             Fix For: 1.12.0
>
>
> 4-jan-2016:
> Divide the screen into two halves.
> All properties in separate tabs.
> Each collection in its own tabs.
> ~~~
> as per [1] mailing list thread.
> The example in the mailng list splits up the object's properties/collections (contributed or otherwise) into two different sets of tabs... but as a first pass I think a single row of tabs ought to suffice.
> We also need to be mindful that we may want to use tabs as a metaphor for multiple opened objects (as a replacement for bookmarks), so this is another reason for a single row of tabs. 
> To support this would require extensions to @DomainObjectLayout or equivalent xxx.layout.json file.
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/merftvqoiy6ht3kq



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)